skeletonbow: I never was familiar with the ME series personally although I've read various comments from others about those games that were unflattering in this regard.
I still like ME1, despite all problems it has, and I think it has best gameplay of all three, plus decent narrative. "Visceral" combat in ME2/3, and faulty narrative there were much of disappointment. For over three hundred bucks dumped only for that series, including DLCs. :D
I'd say stay aside, really. Save you at least 75 hours.
skeletonbow: The last EA game I bought outside of GOG.com was Battle for Middle Earth II which was amazing and still one of my favourite games even though the online servers haven't been active in ages. I've got a few of their newer titles in my Origin account but I haven't paid for any of them.
I probably would forever remember last EA game I bought, because it is... Mass Effect 3. /roflcopter flying off :D Command and Conquer 4 was horrible. And Battlefield 3 was so epic, EA support been escalating ticket for it for five months. Now if you excuse me, I'll leave you for a moment to have a good laughter.
I wasn't kidding when I was saying EA support sucks so much, should they be vacuum cleaners, all other vacuum cleaners manufacturers would go immediate bankrupt, due to pointless competition.
Although I still don't mind to replay old games I like, Crusader, or Wing Commander, I don't really feel like paying EA, no matter how much I liked those games before. Plus Crusader had nice soundtrack.
skeletonbow: Rockstar support is even worse than terrible.
I wonder what's Ubisoft or Bethesda's support are, in this case. When I bought GTA IV they were helpful, actually. Sadly I got localized version and while local distributor refused to replace obviously damaged disk, Rockstar was willing to help, but told me they don't have one. That's still more than Ubisoft ever tried to do. :D
skeletonbow: I went to their website to look for help with a problem and their website redirected me to a GTA video that is a rickroll on Youtube. I shit you not.
<snip>
They refuse to even acknowledge it though, so either they're being douchebags, or their website was hacked and they're too stupid to even notice.
From what I've heard, Rockstar doesn't give a damn much about own employees, and treat other people rather...., well, "we are the rockstar, and you suck". Of course, as many articles' disclaimers state "take it with a grain of salt", but I'd rather believe to what I see.
skeletonbow: Anyhow I filed a proper support request for an issue I had, and that was like last July or so. I just got an email response from them about 4 days ago for it. 10 month response time for a customer support request, awesome. Just let me rip out my wallet and throw money at you for GTA5!
NOT!!!
Wow, I wonder, my case of EA total silence of 5 months and 11 month total to tell me they can't help me (with "try it turn off and on again" in between month 6 and 11) are ahead of you or behind? Remember, it's not us competing, but them.
skeletonbow: Yup, I actually have done just that - Mafia II with PhysX enabled on my Radeon HD7850 and the game crawled to an extreme slideshow instantly. I had no idea why it was so slow and had to go one setting at a time through all the options disabling things until finally disabling PhysX made the game run smooth. I re-maxed out all the other graphics settings and Mafia II runs completely smooth and rock solid at 2560x1600 on my system full frame rate no stuttering. Turn PhysX on -> slideshow. Very lame. It'd really be nice for these companies to work on vendor neutral standards with vendor neutral APIs. You know, like DirectX or even more importantly OpenGL, OpenAL etc. They just love to implement their own anti-consumer proprietary exclusive things though, it's just the nature of things.
Mhm, game works slow? First line on checklist is "Disable PhysX". :) Why it cannot be disabled automatically upon detecting your hardware? You can't enable EAX if your sound card does not support it.
But I agree, very strange way to fight for our wallets, offering features implemented in 2.75 games. In this aspect I respect AMD more for opting to kill Mantle in favour of DX and new OpenGL. Fragmentation does us no good, and I'm not going to take sides in Green/Red war based only on 2-3 features rarely used.
skeletonbow: Both Witcher 1 and 2 run on my system in 2560x1600 with graphics maxed out pretty smoothly. No way in hell am I going to get that lucky with Witcher 3 by a long shot though. LOL I *will* be trying it just to view the amazing slideshow, but I'll let y'all know how I make out in the end. :) Chances are I will get to enjoy seeing the engine and graphics and whatnot but probably wont be able to actually play for real until I get a hardware upgrade in the distant future. That's ok though, I went into my purchase not only suspecting it - but being sure it would likely be the case so I wont be disappointed at CDPR over it at all as I made an informed decision. :)
No offence to CPDR, but there are chances you wouldn't be the only one enjoying slide-show in early days after release. GTA V is nearly month old, but still have unexplainable FPS issues, and nobody gives a damn. While CDPR are known to be more user-friendly, experience with previous games leaves some space for possible performance hit early on.
But if Witcher 3 is indeed console port, I'm pretty sure you'll find the way to play it, to downgrade it even [url=https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CFCE6-1WAAABIaR.jpg:large]further.[/url]:)