It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Is it related to the Hint?
If these films get released on GOG, they'd HAVE to be the original, original trilogy! ;)

Personally, I'm not that fussed about the subsequent modifications made, except for two things:

Why oh why did they put Jabba in "A New Hope"? Han looks like he's standing on Jabba's tail, and he's clearly talking to a normal sized character - so the whole scene looks wrong and was best left on the cutting room floor.

And why oh why when they had all that incredible technology at hand to "improve" the originals, why couldn't they have fixed the only scene that ever bothered me - and that was that terribly artifical looking Rancor in "Return of the Jedi"?
avatar
agogfan: Why oh why did they put Jabba in "A New Hope"? Han looks like he's standing on Jabba's tail, and he's clearly talking to a normal sized character - so the whole scene looks wrong and was best left on the cutting room floor.
From what I recall, Lucas wanted that scene in the original, but they didn't have the technology to add Jabba in the scene, thus it was cut. The fact that they did shoot it does give this theory credibility, even if they weren't sure how Jabba would look at that point.
avatar
agogfan: If these films get released on GOG, they'd HAVE to be the original, original trilogy! ;)

Personally, I'm not that fussed about the subsequent modifications made, except for two things:

Why oh why did they put Jabba in "A New Hope"? Han looks like he's standing on Jabba's tail, and he's clearly talking to a normal sized character - so the whole scene looks wrong and was best left on the cutting room floor.

And why oh why when they had all that incredible technology at hand to "improve" the originals, why couldn't they have fixed the only scene that ever bothered me - and that was that terribly artifical looking Rancor in "Return of the Jedi"?
To me the only great additions of the special editions was the use of CG Spaceships. The Deathstar Battle in the original looked stiff and undynamic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8faBFPENMbg
avatar
JMich: From what I recall, Lucas wanted that scene in the original, but they didn't have the technology to add Jabba in the scene, thus it was cut. The fact that they did shoot it does give this theory credibility, even if they weren't sure how Jabba would look at that point.
I think they should have just left the scene out, but I appreciate that they were trying to blend the three movies together better.
avatar
Elmofongo: To me the only great additions of the special editions was the use of CG Spaceships. The Deathstar Battle in the original looked stiff and undynamic:
Well, if I want to start being hyper-critical now, they could have reworked those Imperial Walkers a bit in "The Empire Stikes Back" - but to be fair, those effects were amazing back then. I still remember seeing the film for the first time in the theatre and being blown away with what I was seeing. Now when I watch the movies on a TV screen, I can't help but notice the limitations of the stop-motion technology that was ground breaking back then.
hey stop motion is always awesome
just watch the nightmare before christmas and the fantastic mr fox
Now THIS would make an awesome movie release on GOG, I admit I don't really like the Star Wars game except for Dark Forces but I do love the movies, hopefully GOG can fix something.
avatar
snowkatt: hey stop motion is always awesome
just watch the nightmare before christmas and the fantastic mr fox
Well OK, but they better have lens flare and motion blur effects. I can't watch a film without those now :P

Is it just me or did all the Transfomer movies just seem like a blur of mayhem? I must be getting old so maybe my eyes don't work as fast as they used to?
avatar
snowkatt: hey stop motion is always awesome
just watch the nightmare before christmas and the fantastic mr fox
avatar
agogfan: Well OK, but they better have lens flare and motion blur effects. I can't watch a film without those now :P

Is it just me or did all the Transfomer movies just seem like a blur of mayhem? I must be getting old so maybe my eyes don't work as fast as they used to?
no they are a blur of mayhem
the camera moves around so much its sickening

but that and the purdy special effects are to distract you from the "plot" ( laughable ) the acting ( insipid ) the humor ( scatological ) or the characters ( thinner then a tissue )

only the fourth movie is decent
the first is passable by being the first 2 and 3 are garbage
avatar
snowkatt: only the fourth movie is decent
the first is passable by being the first 2 and 3 are garbage
Say Whaaaaaaat?

You mean after I suffered through the first one which was OK, then watched the 2nd one and regretted it, and then thought it could only get better and watched the 3rd one... and then said "That's It. I'm Done".... that I just had to try one more to get to a good version?

Man, I gave up too easily!
avatar
snowkatt: only the fourth movie is decent
the first is passable by being the first 2 and 3 are garbage
avatar
agogfan: Say Whaaaaaaat?

You mean after I suffered through the first one which was OK, then watched the 2nd one and regretted it, and then thought it could only get better and watched the 3rd one... and then said "That's It. I'm Done".... that I just had to try one more to get to a good version?

Man, I gave up too easily!
well to say its good is stretching it
4 is not a good movie but compared to the first 3 its a fucking masterpiece

the camera is more stable
the human cast is overhauled and more likable then the ones from the first 3
the humans are now slightly annoying instead of completley fucking frustrating

the oh so funny "humor"has been toned down

its kinda soft reboot
and still assnumbingly long but comapred to 1 2 and 3 much better

still the only real transformers movie is the animated one from 1986
it still beat all 4 of them with its servo's tied and its optics closed
avatar
snowkatt: well to say its good is stretching it
4 is not a good movie but compared to the first 3 its a fucking masterpiece

the camera is more stable
the human cast is overhauled and more likable then the ones from the first 3
the humans are now slightly annoying instead of completley fucking frustrating

the oh so funny "humor"has been toned down

its kinda soft reboot
and still assnumbingly long but comapred to 1 2 and 3 much better

still the only real transformers movie is the animated one from 1986
it still beat all 4 of them with its servo's tied and its optics closed
Well I'm not against animated stuff. I'm one of those who thinks Robotech is still cool today.

But you've gotten me interested in the 4th Transformers movie now, so I'll check it out.
avatar
agogfan: Well I'm not against animated stuff. I'm one of those who thinks Robotech is still cool today.

But you've gotten me interested in the 4th Transformers movie now, so I'll check it out.
dont get your hopes up too much
its not apocalypse now or blade runner
but its better then the other transformers movie ( a very very low bar )
avatar
snowkatt: its not apocalypse now or blade runner
Good :) Sometimes I don't wanna do no thinking when I veg in front of the TV.

Don't get me wrong. I rate Blade Runner as one of the top Sci-Fi films but it is pretty bleak and sometimes you just want some (to use a local phrase)... skop, skiet en donner. Which roughly means kick, shoot and beat-up, i.e. pure action, with at least a small semblance of a plot... or some eye candy like Megan Fox in the first one, which I appreciated all the more since i couldn't make any sense of the frenetic action scenes.