It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
That's a pity but I'm not sure surprised. I see Denuvo becoming the norm. Fortunately someone hopefully will crack it down the line only to see some necessary competition against DRM aduse but more important, game preservation.
avatar
ncameron: How can you be on this forum, on this site, and not understand the issues around any DRM? Whatever the DRM, however easy it is to ignore, and however little trouble it has been for you, history has shown time and time again that the odds are high that it will eventually come back to bite you.
I understand the issues very well. As noted, I'm not a fan of DRM. That doesn't mean I don't play or buy games that have it. But they get very little of my money if they do have it. In the specific case of Denuvo, it's much like other things such as Origin: a lot of hysteria and fud about what it does and how bad it is, when the reality is far different.

But this is about as much as I'm going to say about this topic, as it never goes anywhere good.
avatar
fishbaits: The game, as others with Denuvo, will still end up being cracked & pirated, so the only ones this inconveniences is the rest of us that would've paid for the game.
The only reason denuvo was cracked was because a demo was released. No demo means no crack. What will software companies learn from this?
Agreed.

Different people have different values and trying to convert or explain to people is a lost cause:

On one extreme you have the people who want the new shiny and they'll do anything to get it.
On the other extreme you have those who wouldn't touch it with a 10ft pole if it has DRM attached.

Then you have the fuzziness in between:
It only requires activations sometimes (this sometimes being different values)? Shrug. OK
It only has 2 layers of DRM instead of 3. Shrug. Okay.
It has DRM. Fine then I'll buy it on a steam sale.
It's just a game (ie not important) why do you care?
It has DRM? Well Valve/whoever said they'll remove it when they go out of business so I'll buy it anyway because Valve can definetly do this and an out of business company will definetly make this a priority for the shit ton of games they have..
You're crazy a computer company going out of business? How likely is that? I'll buy it anyway.
etc
etc
etc

What is highly annoying is the willfull ignorance. It's the same with politics the amount of knowledge required to be aware of all of the details is way more effort than a person who just wants to play a game today at this moment and will never play it again is willing to give, and hey it's just $59.99 to play the remaster in 10 years anyway. The only thing saving those of us who do care is the massive backlog of games that don't have DRM, the games that do have DRM that have cracks and the current and future games that don't have DRM and that have cracks for that DRM. The games with DRM that are never cracked (and the devs and pubs who approved it) can DIAF for all I care.

GOG, if you get Dishonored 2 DRM free you'll have my money.
Post edited November 05, 2016 by DosFreak
avatar
JK41R4: And the ones that do will probably remove it from their games years from now anyway.
Could be, or they could do as Rockstar and leave the several DRM layers that GTA IV still has to this day.
avatar
227: The greatest argument I've seen against Denuvo is that things like DSFix (and probably the unofficial VTM:B fixes/mods) wouldn't be possible if Dark Souls had used it. Because developers always release games in stellar shape. Then there are the game preservation concerns down the line, and the fact that it basically gives publishers yet another avenue to kill off old games to "encourage" people to buy newer incarnations.

I get that it's not an immediate problem and practically invisible for many players as a result, but that doesn't mean that it's harmless. Especially in the long run if it becomes so accepted that it sees greater adoption.
Well said.

Educating the consumers of now and tomorrow about the implications of DRM, and even just services that require clients to access products you own, would be a good way of making sure that Denuvo and similar don't easily gain widespread acceptance. And I guess supporting the companies that don't employ such things would help.

The optimist that I am, I think Denuvo will start to lose favour if they have to make their system more restricting.

avatar
227: Yeah. In the Game of the Millennium Super Deluxe Repackaged Edition that forces you to rebuy the game to have continued support.
Actually, I think we'd only be getting Game of The Century Editions in a few years.


avatar
JK41R4: And the ones that do will probably remove it from their games years from now anyway.
avatar
rodrolliv: Could be, or they could do as Rockstar and leave the several DRM layers that GTA IV still has to this day.
Okay, good point, but R* probably don't care about PC gamers or their old games that much anyway.
Post edited November 05, 2016 by JK41R4
I didn't used to be that concerned with DRM as it was but now that I'm almost going on 40 game 'preservation' is really the last thing on my list of concerns for gaming. I'm far more interested in seeing as many games out there as possible and if that means devs need to protect their own interests to some extent I'm fine with that. So far I haven't even noticed Denuvo in the games I played yet.

Same goes for Metal Gear Solid V that someone asked. Ran like an absolute charm, great performance on that one.

avatar
Andrey82: Well, then i will pass this game. Never bought (or even pirated) any game with Denuvo because all of them had quite low quality gameplay.
Spoken like someone who (selfadmittedly) hasn't played the games he's making a quality statement about.
Post edited November 05, 2016 by Pheace
avatar
Densetsu: Tell me about it.

I have to skip PES 2017 because of it, and I was really eager to play it. Worse yet, there's no mention of 3rd party DRM on Steam, I found out about it by accident when browsing the game.
Good news for you is that PES 2017's Denuvo protection has been broken (not getting into the semetics of a "proper" release and all that as along as it's from the scene groups and it works). So if you know where to look you can have some kind backup that enables you to own/keep your game for real.

Dishonoured 2's Denuvo protection will go down the same way at one point or another. It's just a matter of time. And waiting is not a bad thing. This will give room for the bugs to be fixed and the DLCs released.
avatar
Densetsu: Tell me about it.

I have to skip PES 2017 because of it, and I was really eager to play it. Worse yet, there's no mention of 3rd party DRM on Steam, I found out about it by accident when browsing the game.
avatar
Nicole28: Good news for you is that PES 2017's Denuvo protection has been broken (not getting into the semetics of a "proper" release and all that as along as it's from the scene groups and it works). So if you know where to look you can have some kind backup that enables you to own/keep your game for real.

Dishonoured 2's Denuvo protection will go down the same way at one point or another. It's just a matter of time. And waiting is not a bad thing. This will give room for the bugs to be fixed and the DLCs released.
Waiting for the post release news to see if game was any good didn't bother me, even if I could get it cheaper before hand.
Waiting for them to realise Denuvo should be burnt at the stake may take longer than I'm willing to wait (or live, I'm old hehe), so I'll just play other games & wait & see ;)
Frankly, anything with Denuvo can just fuck off. I don't care how good a game is, I will *never* accept a game with Denuvo; not even for free (same goes for Origin, UPlay etc). The only way to get companies to stop using DRM is by refusing to accept it & not buying games that use it.

On a related note: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/bethesda_claims_to_be_antidrm
Guess their quote should really be:
...we’re anti-DRM as far as we can be... which isn't that far because we really love DRM
Also: https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/52kv1t/offline_pc_gaming_test_result_origin_and_denuvo/
Post edited November 05, 2016 by adamhm
avatar
fishbaits: Waiting for the post release news to see if game was any good didn't bother me, even if I could get it cheaper before hand.
Waiting for them to realise Denuvo should be burnt at the stake may take longer than I'm willing to wait (or live, I'm old hehe), so I'll just play other games & wait & see ;)
Haha, yeah! Would be ideal if DRM would be extinct tomorrow. But GOG has a ton of fantastic games. I haven't even finished playing half of the all games I own in my library! Definitely I can wait and see as well. :)
avatar
Nicole28: Good news for you is that PES 2017's Denuvo protection has been broken (not getting into the semetics of a "proper" release and all that as along as it's from the scene groups and it works). So if you know where to look you can have some kind backup that enables you to own/keep your game for real.

Dishonoured 2's Denuvo protection will go down the same way at one point or another. It's just a matter of time. And waiting is not a bad thing. This will give room for the bugs to be fixed and the DLCs released.
As far as I know, PES 2017 was properly cracked by CPY.

But unfortunately with Denuvo, it's not as simple as waiting for the bugs to be fixed. Right now cracking a denuvo game requires a lot of effort and time. Which means only the release version has been cracked. And cracks usually only work for a given version. So patched versions have to be cracked again. And right now I don't see that happening.

So yes, as it has been the case in the industry this last years, it is better for publishers to release buggy games as an antipirate nad drm measure. And to make sure retail copies are worthless, so everyone embrace the digital era once and for all (that's more of a console thing, as in pc retail versions are mostly steam keys nowadays anyway).
Post edited November 05, 2016 by rgnrk
avatar
fishbaits: Waiting for the post release news to see if game was any good didn't bother me, even if I could get it cheaper before hand.
Waiting for them to realise Denuvo should be burnt at the stake may take longer than I'm willing to wait (or live, I'm old hehe), so I'll just play other games & wait & see ;)
avatar
Nicole28: Haha, yeah! Would be ideal if DRM would be extinct tomorrow. But GOG has a ton of fantastic games. I haven't even finished playing half of the all games I own in my library! Definitely I can wait and see as well. :)
Roughly 500 games I have & they're all completed.
Yes, that's right *shifty eyes* every single one cleared *cough*, all pointless achievements gained & DLC finished too *wink*.

So, guess I'll have to start them all all over again until Denuvo is ousted ;)
avatar
Pheace: Spoken like someone who (selfadmittedly) hasn't played the games he's making a quality statement about.
For example, what good game have Denuvo? MGSV? With cut out last third of game? With same missions in second Act? When almost every gamer CRIES that only first third if that game is good and other 2/3 is not? When it price on Steam dropped VERY FAST even when crack wasn't present?

P.S. I playing PC games from 1991 and i have enough expirience so i don't need to taste dirt to conclude that it is not tastes good. :)

P.P.S. Never bought (or even pirated) any game with Denuvo, but played for a little because a friend of mine bought them and wanted my opinion of them. So, he let me play this games and what can i say - it's very bad.
Post edited November 05, 2016 by Andrey82
avatar
Andrey82: For example, what good game have Denuvo?
DOOM for one. Mad Max too. Rise of the Tomb Raider. The new Deus Ex...