DarkoD13: post test
Lifthrasil: So, either you both are scum and you hesitate to make a solid statement because you want to avoid contradictions with what meda wrote. Especially because you don't have a day-chat according to the mod.
DarkoD13: I enjoy that you would throw the lack of a day-chat out there as a possibility. Wouldn't verifying that be the easiest thing ever? Did you ever ask for proof or were you OK with the ambiguity?
Lifthrasil: but gain a confirmation of Darko
DarkoD13: How would that work exactly?
Can't quote trent for whatever reason.
"No one except you can confirm her claim and you have made it clear her claim is not legit because y'all are not Masons together. So what would you have us do when she's been misleading us with her claim?"
Maybe not vote for the person another player says it's extremely unlikely to be scum because of her power? That's more than I can say about any of you. I don't know how her power is explained by the mod in he PMs, I only have access to quicktopic.
I suspect that some townies are voting for her simply out of frustration, thinking she broke the flow of the game. While the play is unconventional, it's not her fault quad disappeared when he did. The day-chat shows them being on the same page on the confirmation thing, but at least on quad's side, I assume it was always mostly because of mechanics.
I have not voted her yet because I've been trying to make an informed decision. She keeps dodging questions on the issue and when I try to find out exactly what she meant by breaking it down she accuses me of being scum for twisting things, and that's another outright lie because I have not twisted anything. So look at this from the perspective of someone who does not have the information you do and then tell me how I should react to meda with how she's handled all this.
