DarkoD13: Based on the info in the qt and how she went about playing it, I find her being mafia extremely unlikely. I don't see enough to exclude a neutral role.
Unless I'm missing something obvious, which wouldn't be impossible since you all have decided to pile up and not give me a proper chance to catch up, I can't exclude the possibility of a neutral.
Which means that meda lied again. She said she had used a power that would confirm her 100% as town to you directly. And confirm you as town to her. If that would have been the case, you wouldn't have to catch up, because you would have recieved a statement by the mod that meda is town. (anything else wouldn't be a 100% confirmation).
So, either you both are scum and you hesitate to make a solid statement because you want to avoid contradictions with what meda wrote. Especially because you don't have a day-chat according to the mod. Or you are not alignment linked, meda sent you some information / neighborization or whatever, which is, however, not as 100% town confirming as she told it. In any case, there is a contradiction again and this means there is something off about the meda/darko pairing.
And now, with now 100% mutual confirmation, I see only one way to unravel this. Lynch one of the two, as has been discussed several times. Preferrably meda, since she is the one who made all these claims. I don't know whether she oversells her role intentionally or whether she didn't understand what her role does on darko's/quad's side or whatever. But the point is: if she is telling the truth, she already used up her role and is just vanilla. If the lynch on her is a mislynch, we lose a vanilla but gain a confirmation of Darko, who might be PR or anything. If she, however, is scum or neutral who tried some stupid gamble, we get to rejoice after the lynch. I still see Gamma as scummy for how easily he trusted the then still completely unconfirmed meda, but I think game-wise it makes most sense to lynch meda. There is a good chance that she was making stuff up and even if part of what she wrote is true, we gain a confirmation.
unvote Gamma
vote meda @Darko: no. I am not going to state my name since, as you will see once you have caught up, revealing my name would in effect be the same as a full claim. I am not ready to do a full claim yet.