Posted June 20, 2020
SirMrFailRomp: Lynch me if you really can't stand waiting until I have a chance to get going, or give me an actual chance to warm up. I'm not going to start pulling stuff out of thin air on D1 just because "I should have something".thing.
gogtrial34987: The thing with this attitude - which is not very helpful, but is fine for an ATE - is that it seems somewhat hard to put it in the same narrative with responses like: SirMrFailRomp: Ask specific questions please, I don't know which opinions I haven't given sufficient explanation for.
gogtrial34987: and gogtrial34987:
My question to Flockeschnee was simply that I wasn't sure which opinions I had given that weren't explained enough.
gogtrial34987: Also, the one time you were actually putting up something of an argument was here:
That's exactly the point! I'm not really convinced we should lynch Carradice for PMgate, he's just my prime suspect by process of elimination. SirMrFailRomp: Sure, but the choice to not read the PM is inherently NAI so it essentially leaves his odds of being scum at the base probability from the dice rolls used to distribute the roles. Of course he could be scum, but I don't see it as any more likely than anyone else being scum at this point.
gogtrial34987: Which to me feels pretty defensive of Carradice - and yet now he's your prime suspect (even if "not a strong case"). FlockeSchnee: You must have thought something when you made the following two posts, so please elaborate?
This is helpful, this was before I was ill and I'd completely forgotten about it.
It seems like ages ago but Joe (and dedo to a lesser extent) did make quite a thing of the avatar changes even though Joe at least should be aware that the avatars take way too long to change for the to have done it at the start of the game. But really it just seems like Joe didn't think about it enough before posting rather than it being some kind of slip. I don't think Joe's mistake is AI, but his "general offness" might be.
Hmm, I really don't like this non-majority lynch thing because normally I'd be worried about the possibility of a no-lynch so I'd be going "Shit, better vote for someone!" and I'd commit to a wagon. But with this system there is no danger of an accidental no-lynch so I don't feel the same pressure to vote to make sure we avoid it. Normally in this situation I might vote for the leading wagon even if my heart wasn't in it, but it's not really needed for this one.
I'm rambling because I'm tipsy, sorry. Damn, I nearly lost this post while trying to copy it from notepad because I pressed Ctrl+V instead of Ctrl+C, but undo saved me. ヽ(*⌒▽⌒*)ノ
SirMrFailRomp: The avatar shenanigans are irrelevant but the fact that some people thought they were important might not be, I buy trent's explanation re: voting for scene.
FlockeSchnee: It seems like ages ago but Joe (and dedo to a lesser extent) did make quite a thing of the avatar changes even though Joe at least should be aware that the avatars take way too long to change for the to have done it at the start of the game. But really it just seems like Joe didn't think about it enough before posting rather than it being some kind of slip. I don't think Joe's mistake is AI, but his "general offness" might be.
Hmm, I really don't like this non-majority lynch thing because normally I'd be worried about the possibility of a no-lynch so I'd be going "Shit, better vote for someone!" and I'd commit to a wagon. But with this system there is no danger of an accidental no-lynch so I don't feel the same pressure to vote to make sure we avoid it. Normally in this situation I might vote for the leading wagon even if my heart wasn't in it, but it's not really needed for this one.
I'm rambling because I'm tipsy, sorry. Damn, I nearly lost this post while trying to copy it from notepad because I pressed Ctrl+V instead of Ctrl+C, but undo saved me. ヽ(*⌒▽⌒*)ノ