It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
What a shitstorm, I swear everyday another gaming outrage props up, why did it have to be with one of my gaming classics
avatar
jaketward: Do the hate mob not see how ridiculous they sound? Angry entitled white guy creates thread demanding people stop buying a game because, heaven forbid, they decided to subtly add some content to their new game that puts female characters into a slightly more positive light. Angry white guy loudly proclaims this is due to politics and it's being forced down our throats and we should all stand up ~do something~.

The only person who's forcing a politically biased opinion down anyone's throat is you OP. Your arguments are hollow, but I'm sure you've spend so long in the 4chan/reddit echo chambers you've grown deaf to it. If the inclusion of this content really drives you to such incandescent rage that you're prepared to soap box in a fucking sub forum on GOG, I would strongly suggest you seek help. Or stop reading Breitbart.
avatar
Gromuhl: What I see:
- 1 red herring
- 2 ad hominems (one of which is very lengthy)
- at least 3 non-sequiturs
- generalizing

That's a lot of logical fallacies for such a short message.
Therefore the only conclusion we can come to is: your argument is invalid.
Don't forget about racism and sexism - the poster assumed the OP is white and male with no basis.
low rated
avatar
Gromuhl: What I see:
- 1 red herring
- 2 ad hominems (one of which is very lengthy)
- at least 3 non-sequiturs
- generalizing

That's a lot of logical fallacies for such a short message.
Therefore the only conclusion we can come to is: your argument is invalid.
avatar
Taro94: Don't forget about racism and sexism - the poster assumed the OP is white and male with no basis.
OP - White and male? c/n
avatar
jaketward: Do the hate mob not see how ridiculous they sound? Angry entitled white guy creates thread demanding people stop buying a game because, heaven forbid, they decided to subtly add some content to their new game that puts female characters into a slightly more positive light. Angry white guy loudly proclaims this is due to politics and it's being forced down our throats and we should all stand up ~do something~.

The only person who's forcing a politically biased opinion down anyone's throat is you OP. Your arguments are hollow, but I'm sure you've spend so long in the 4chan/reddit echo chambers you've grown deaf to it. If the inclusion of this content really drives you to such incandescent rage that you're prepared to soap box in a fucking sub forum on GOG, I would strongly suggest you seek help. Or stop reading Breitbart.
avatar
Gromuhl: What I see:
- 1 red herring
- 2 ad hominems (one of which is very lengthy)
- at least 3 non-sequiturs
- generalizing

That's a lot of logical fallacies for such a short message.
Therefore the only conclusion we can come to is: your argument is invalid.
Well at least no gamergater is guilty of any of the above either. I mean how dare someone make sweeping generalisations such as, I don't know, all SJWs don't play games. Neckbeards in glass basements be warned.
Post edited April 04, 2016 by jaketward
avatar
jaketward: Do the hate mob not see how ridiculous they sound? Angry entitled white guy creates thread demanding people stop buying a game because, heaven forbid, they decided to subtly add some content to their new game that puts female characters into a slightly more positive light. Angry white guy loudly proclaims this is due to politics and it's being forced down our throats and we should all stand up ~do something~.

The only person who's forcing a politically biased opinion down anyone's throat is you OP. Your arguments are hollow, but I'm sure you've spend so long in the 4chan/reddit echo chambers you've grown deaf to it. If the inclusion of this content really drives you to such incandescent rage that you're prepared to soap box in a fucking sub forum on GOG, I would strongly suggest you seek help. Or stop reading Breitbart.
avatar
Gromuhl: What I see:
- 1 red herring
- 2 ad hominems (one of which is very lengthy)
- at least 3 non-sequiturs
- generalizing

That's a lot of logical fallacies for such a short message.
Therefore the only conclusion we can come to is: your argument is invalid.
It would be helpful if you could explain exactly where you spotted these rare species. Otherwise your argument is a bit invalid as well, I'm afraid.
avatar
jaketward: Well at least no gamergater is guilty of any of the above either. I mean how dare someone make sweeping generalisations such as, I don't know, all SJWs don't play games.
True, it can be applied to 90% of this thread.

avatar
yggr: It would be helpful if you could explain exactly where you spotted these rare species. Otherwise your argument is a bit invalid as well, I'm afraid.
Species? I never mentioned species (maybe the herring :P)
Post edited April 04, 2016 by Gromuhl
Nice thread!
Everyone's ablaze with the Righteous Anger, hurling at each other Fireballs of Sacred Hate.
Good, really good!
Myself, I do not like this expansion for 2 reasons:
1)WEAK writing (plot is... well, standard fantasy adventure; dialogs are too simple; your decisions matter little)
2) Aroogant attitude of madam writer ("if they do not like it - let them deal with it").
Well, it is not Beamdog's original franchise, so that kind of attitude is not acceptable - it is old fanbase that made this company's business profitable and if they want the support from community they MUST treat said community with care.
As an example - see DMC, reboot of Devil May Cry. The game itself is quite decent, but arrogant middle finger gesture the studio gave to the old fans (if you google you will find the facts) cost them - sales of DMC are very weak.

Oh, and to be true to the spirit of this fine discussion: the progressists and LGBT lobbyists are worst kind of liars and propaganda-spreaders in gamers' world.
And, like that lady writer Amber Scott said: "If you do not like it - deal with it"! SJW must be treated the way they treat others.
It is quite sad how people seem to be giving low rating based on one transgender npc and few lines of dialog. Like usually internet people overreact and blow things out of proportion. Besides I thought roleplayers were open minded folk. I quess I was wrong.

Even if you dislike some of the writing in this game, it does not deserve the lowest rating. You have to weight these so called negatives against clear positives, like fun gameplay etc.
Post edited April 04, 2016 by loup
avatar
loup: I thought roleplayers were open minded folk. I quess I was wrong.
You weren't frequenting internet forums much around Fallout 3's release, were you?
avatar
Yunipuma: Nice thread!
Everyone's ablaze with the Righteous Anger, hurling at each other Fireballs of Sacred Hate.
Good, really good!
Myself, I do not like this expansion for 2 reasons:
1)WEAK writing (plot is... well, standard fantasy adventure; dialogs are too simple; your decisions matter little)
2) Aroogant attitude of madam writer ("if they do not like it - let them deal with it").
Well, it is not Beamdog's original franchise, so that kind of attitude is not acceptable - it is old fanbase that made this company's business profitable and if they want the support from community they MUST treat said community with care.
As an example - see DMC, reboot of Devil May Cry. The game itself is quite decent, but arrogant middle finger gesture the studio gave to the old fans (if you google you will find the facts) cost them - sales of DMC are very weak.

Oh, and to be true to the spirit of this fine discussion: the progressists and LGBT lobbyists are worst kind of liars and propaganda-spreaders in gamers' world.
And, like that lady writer Amber Scott said: "If you do not like it - deal with it"! SJW must be treated the way they treat others.
Sorry, but this is just double standard at it's best. You complain that Amber Scott tells us about her issues with the original BG-setting, takes responsibility for her writing and tells people to deal with it. On the other hand you have issues with her work, but instead of dealing with it productively, you just accuse her of arrogance. You deny to her what you're doing yourself. And again, there is a difference between being of different opinions and of being attacked on a personal level. Pointing out flaws in a system does not automatically mean that your spitting in the face of those who believe in squid system. Maybe it's even honest interest to make it even better.
Weak writing is another matter. I'll have a go at the DLC and see for myself.
high rated
After seeing this one erupt all over the internet for the last few hours, as best as I can tell, hardly anybody is actually upset about the inclusion of transsexual characters in gaming. Most of the gamers I've seen talking about this have actually been very supportive.

The big issues seem to be:

1) Nobody likes being interrupted during their fantasy RPGs to be preached at. Most of the criticism I've seen is that the writing is incredibly ham-fisted, and appears to be more interested in pushing an agenda rather than telling a good story that just, y'know, happens to includes trans characters in an engaging and naturalistic manner. (Trans players themselves seem to be quite upset by this type of writing, and seem to think that it does more harm than good to them to be patronized in this way by well-meaning, but ultimately misguided writers.)

2) People in group 1 really, really don't like to be accused of being bigots, just for criticizing bad writing, especially by the people whose game they are planning on buying. (That's just plain awful customer service, and the reason that I won't be buying this game.) This is a problem that has been cropping up in many communities for years, in that there are a lot of very hateful people who seem to enjoy mobbing and harassing others with baseless accusations of being "misogynistic", "homo/transphobic", racist, etc., which is appears to be basically an evolution of classic trolling that tries to hold the vague appearance of having some kind of moral backing. (It doesn't.)

The only thing I can suggest for this problem is that communities need to get better at policing these people, and that anybody who starts throwing these accusations around should be treated in exactly the same way that other persistent trolls are. Also, customers should be showing zero tolerance towards developers that attack their customers in this way.
avatar
Buckid: After seeing this one erupt all over the internet for the last few hours, as best as I can tell, hardly anybody is actually upset about the inclusion of transsexual characters in gaming. Most of the gamers I've seen talking about this have actually been very supportive.

The big issues seem to be:

1) Nobody likes being interrupted during their fantasy RPGs to be preached at. Most of the criticism I've seen is that the writing is incredibly ham-fisted, and appears to be more interested in pushing an agenda rather than telling a good story that just, y'know, happens to includes trans characters in an engaging and naturalistic manner. (Trans players themselves seem to be quite upset by this type of writing, and seem to think that it does more harm than good to them to be patronized in this way by well-meaning, but ultimately misguided writers.)

2) People in group 1 really, really don't like to be accused of being bigots, just for criticizing bad writing, especially by the people whose game they are planning on buying. (That's just plain awful customer service, and the reason that I won't be buying this game.) This is a problem that has been cropping up in many communities for years, in that there are a lot of very hateful people who seem to enjoy mobbing and harassing others with baseless accusations of being "misogynistic", "homo/transphobic", racist, etc., which is appears to be basically an evolution of classic trolling that tries to hold the vague appearance of having some kind of moral backing. (It doesn't.)

The only thing I can suggest for this problem is that communities need to get better at policing these people, and that anybody who starts throwing these accusations around should be treated in exactly the same way that other persistent trolls are. Also, customers should be showing zero tolerance towards developers that attack their customers in this way.
That's the best worded reply so far. Thumbs up!
Post edited April 04, 2016 by Gromuhl
Could someone please post Quotes with spoiler warnings from Dragonspear with these controversial parts (like Minsc talking about gamergate). It could help clarify this stuff. Thanks.
Post edited April 04, 2016 by mainzelcount
avatar
Buckid: After seeing this one erupt all over the internet for the last few hours, as best as I can tell, hardly anybody is actually upset about the inclusion of transsexual characters in gaming. Most of the gamers I've seen talking about this have actually been very supportive.

The big issues seem to be:

1) Nobody likes being interrupted during their fantasy RPGs to be preached at. Most of the criticism I've seen is that the writing is incredibly ham-fisted, and appears to be more interested in pushing an agenda rather than telling a good story that just, y'know, happens to includes trans characters in an engaging and naturalistic manner. (Trans players themselves seem to be quite upset by this type of writing, and seem to think that it does more harm than good to them to be patronized in this way by well-meaning, but ultimately misguided writers.)

2) People in group 1 really, really don't like to be accused of being bigots, just for criticizing bad writing, especially by the people whose game they are planning on buying. (That's just plain awful customer service, and the reason that I won't be buying this game.) This is a problem that has been cropping up in many communities for years, in that there are a lot of very hateful people who seem to enjoy mobbing and harassing others with baseless accusations of being "misogynistic", "homo/transphobic", racist, etc., which is appears to be basically an evolution of classic trolling that tries to hold the vague appearance of having some kind of moral backing. (It doesn't.)

The only thing I can suggest for this problem is that communities need to get better at policing these people, and that anybody who starts throwing these accusations around should be treated in exactly the same way that other persistent trolls are. Also, customers should be showing zero tolerance towards developers that attack their customers in this way.
avatar
Gromuhl: That's the best worded reply so far. Thumbs up!
I agree.
One small thing though. You are right to say that certain people abuse political correctness to harass others. But I still believe (or want to believe) that majorities can and should afford to be tolerant while minorities often can not. Society should be able to tolerate the odd blunt approach to gender equality for the sake of society itself.
And did I miss something? I honestly didn't find quotes where Beamdog insults their potential customers. I did search!
avatar
Gromuhl: That's the best worded reply so far. Thumbs up!
avatar
yggr: I agree.
One small thing though. You are right to say that certain people abuse political correctness to harass others. But I still believe (or want to believe) that majorities can and should afford to be tolerant while minorities often can not. Society should be able to tolerate the odd blunt approach to gender equality for the sake of society itself.
And did I miss something? I honestly didn't find quotes where Beamdog insults their potential customers. I did search!
I have been Baldur's Gate fan for more than 15 years. Regardless the SoD content I'm very offended by this statement:
"“If there was something for the original Baldur’s Gate that just doesn’t mesh for modern day gamers like the sexism, [we tried to address that],” said writer Amber Scott. "

Labelling original BG as "sexist" and trying to "fix" it in new SoD expansion is sacrilege.
Post edited April 04, 2016 by oldlamehand
low rated
avatar
Buckid: After seeing this one erupt all over the internet for the last few hours, as best as I can tell, hardly anybody is actually upset about the inclusion of transsexual characters in gaming. Most of the gamers I've seen talking about this have actually been very supportive.

The big issues seem to be:

1) Nobody likes being interrupted during their fantasy RPGs to be preached at. Most of the criticism I've seen is that the writing is incredibly ham-fisted, and appears to be more interested in pushing an agenda rather than telling a good story that just, y'know, happens to includes trans characters in an engaging and naturalistic manner. (Trans players themselves seem to be quite upset by this type of writing, and seem to think that it does more harm than good to them to be patronized in this way by well-meaning, but ultimately misguided writers.)

2) People in group 1 really, really don't like to be accused of being bigots, just for criticizing bad writing, especially by the people whose game they are planning on buying. (That's just plain awful customer service, and the reason that I won't be buying this game.) This is a problem that has been cropping up in many communities for years, in that there are a lot of very hateful people who seem to enjoy mobbing and harassing others with baseless accusations of being "misogynistic", "homo/transphobic", racist, etc., which is appears to be basically an evolution of classic trolling that tries to hold the vague appearance of having some kind of moral backing. (It doesn't.)

The only thing I can suggest for this problem is that communities need to get better at policing these people, and that anybody who starts throwing these accusations around should be treated in exactly the same way that other persistent trolls are. Also, customers should be showing zero tolerance towards developers that attack their customers in this way.
No one is calling people bigots for criticising bad writing though. This whole furore wouldn't have even existed if the expansion just contained poorly written NPCs. Instead, it contained one (possibly) poorly written NPC that happens to be LGBT. If gamergates are really so up in arms about shoddily written minorities, why aren't they also outraged about all the other instances of stereotypes in games? They're not, because they're focussed on attacking the people trying to change the status quo, that being white males>all else. It's a smoke screen, and anyone who can't, or won't see that, is either dangerously naive or drinking deep from the coolade pitcher.