It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
Fenixp: Do feel free to talk your thoughts on a fixed meaning of words with an actual linguist, he's going to laugh as much as I do :-P
Rabbits eat broccoli? Interesting.

Ah yes, "fixed meaning for words", I feel far more liberated when I can change their meanings at will. So much fun! Your argument has now descended into absolute absurdity. Put down the weed and step out of mom's basement for a minute so we can get back to a discussion set in reality.

According to the study I cited above, 96.6% of people surveyed, identify as heterosexual. That is the norm among human population. Those that identify with another sexual orientation are NOT normal because they deviate from "the usual, average, or typical state or condition. "

avatar
Fenixp: No matter how much I search, I can't find any source to confirm that mental issues in homosexuals would, in fact, be caused by people accepting them, so feel free to disclose them. Clearly, the issue is much more complex than a body of your or my knowledge could comprehend - in fact, event scientific world is yet to identify what leads to a 'abnormality' as widespread as 4% of population and what its ramifications actually are. However, going by a golden rule of "Innocent until proven guilty," I'm going to go with accepting homosexuality until a direct link between homosexuality and mental disorder (barring outside influence, of course) is found. As far as I know, my approach is not harming anyone, and thus is the best one to adopt. It's extremely easy to find sources on why and how your approach is harming people. Unless you have materials to prove me otherwise, what I am presenting you with are academically verified facts - take them for what you will.
Just admit it, you're now feeling the guilt because you realize that deep down, you and others like you are the ones who cause these people grief, pain and sadness. Lying to others and ones self will only bring sadness. It's called gender dysphoria, read J. Michael Bailey's studies on it.
Post edited April 09, 2016 by lumin
avatar
Madoga: Being gay is not normal for a mammal, but gay mammals occurring (in nature) is normal.
avatar
lumin: No it's not, because gay mammals are not "the usual, average, or typical state or condition. " of sexual orientation among all mammals. The sample size doesn't matter, take a large or small sample, the percentages are still the same.

If there is no "control" to measure "normal" by, normal no longer even has a definition. But then it isn't a valid word at all. You could argue that mass extinction causing astroids hitting Earth is normal because it "occurs" in nature, Big Bangs are "normal" because they "happen" too.

That's not a definition at all. Using no control to measure normal by isn't measuring anything.

The control here is the entire species of human beings. Among that species, over 96% consider themselves hetereosexual. In other words, heterosexual is the "norm" or is "normal" among human beings. Good grief, the junk science and irrationality here is off the charts. Why do I have to even explain this? This is what passes for enlightened thinking in 2016. *facepalm*

Homosexuality and, to an even greater extent, transexuality is not normal among human beings and mammals. Period. I know that hurts some peoples' touchy feely sensibilities, but I am not a respecter of persons, I'm a respecter of principle first and foremost. Nobody, not even Ed Greenwood has a monopoly on truth or right.

That's why, in large part, you see this backlash to this stuff being forced into a game. This trans character is forced, it's unnatural, it's ham-fisted 2016, social left-wing, regressive politicking in Dungeons and Dragons. It. Doesn't. Belong.
You have absolutely no idea what schizophrenia is. I'm a schizophrenic patient myself.
avatar
lumin: Just admit it, you're now feeling the guilt because you realize that deep down, you and others like you are the ones who cause these people grief, pain and sadness. Lying to others and ones self will only bring sadness. It's called gender dysphoria, read J. Michael Bailey's studies on it.
Given that he keeps misgendering trans women in his works (like calling straight trans women "homosexual", and he doesn't accept lesbian trans women as legitimate, I would not consider his studies to be reliable sources.

http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/bailey-quotations.html

Edit: Another link:
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/LynnsReviewOfBaileysBook.html
Post edited April 09, 2016 by dtgreene
avatar
lumin: According to the study I cited above, 96.6% of people surveyed, identify as heterosexual. That is the norm among human population. Those that identify with another sexual orientation are NOT normal because they deviate from "the usual, average, or typical state or condition. "
According to the study you cited above, 96.6% of people surveyed identify as heterosexual. That is the norm among human population. The 3.4% that identify with another sexual orientation are therefore strictly adhering to the norm specified. ... I could do this all day :-P At any rate, thank you for repeatedly bringing up the percentages. Because those numbers are all that you're bringing up by saying something is "not normal". It's not an argument, it's not a proof of anything and vague statements such as "not normal" have no place in a half-serious discussion. As we have managed to prove repeatedly.

avatar
lumin: Just admit it, you're now feeling the guilt because you realize that deep down, you and others like you are the ones who cause these people grief, pain and sadness. Lying to others and ones self will only bring sadness. It's called gender dysphoria, read J. Michael Bailey's studies on it.
I'm feeling guilt because a man wrote a book based on his research? You mean when faced with sheer volume of research which has proven the opposite? I mean ... would you? Still, thank you, I will take a look at it.
Post edited April 09, 2016 by Fenixp
low rated
Just felt I should share this. Too funny. This is a quote from Jaheira in BG2. From a conversation where Aerie calls her "nagging". In light of that Amber Scott interview where she claims Jaheira was nothing but a nagging wife.

Well...Jaheira has a reply to that.

https://15254b2dcaab7f5478ab-24461f391e20b7336331d5789078af53.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/baldursgate.vanillaforums.com/editor/0l/8plb6v4loza0.jpg
avatar
Stig79: Just felt I should share this. Too funny. This is a quote from Jaheira in BG2. From a conversation where Aerie calls her "nagging". In light of that Amber Scott interview where she claims Jaheira was nothing but a nagging wife.

Well...Jaheira has a reply to that.

https://15254b2dcaab7f5478ab-24461f391e20b7336331d5789078af53.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/baldursgate.vanillaforums.com/editor/0l/8plb6v4loza0.jpg
Oh snap! :D
avatar
Ssnake51: Agree with much of what you have written here. You take a much kinder approach to Lumin than I would. He (she?) is basically advocating for biological modification of people to fit his notion of what is 'normal'. Even weirder, he seems to think all those who disagree with him are under a 'mass delusion'. :-(
avatar
lumin: Not my notion, the dictionary's notion.

[i]
nor·mal
ˈnôrməl

adjective
1.
conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.

noun
1.
the usual, average, or typical state or condition.

"According to a report published in July by the Centers for Disease Control, 96.6% of adults identified themselves as straight in the 2013 National Health Interview Survey, which, for the first time in its 57-year history included questions about sexual orientation.

The report says 1.6 percent of 34,557 adults surveyed identified as gay or lesbian. Another 0.7 percent identified as bisexual.

Another 1.1 percent either did not answer the question (0.6 percent) or selected “something else” from the list of answers (0.2 percent) or “I don’t know” (0.4 percent)."
http://newstome.blog.ajc.com/2014/08/06/cdc-96-6-percent-of-americans-are-straight/
[/i]

Less than 4% of the population identify their sexual orientation as something other than heterosexual. That means that the "normal" sexual orientation in the United States is straight.

People who identify as trans and homosexual are, by the dictionaries definition, abnormal.

[i]ab·nor·mal
abˈnôrməl/
deviating from what is normal or usual.
[/i]

My question is where did you kids go to school? Do they not teach this stuff anymore? And yes, anyone who is incapable of understanding what the word normal means, is certainly under a delusion.
Are blue-eyed or blonde people abnormal in your opinion just for the sake of understanding the point you trying to make?
Post edited April 10, 2016 by Stilgars
[redacted]

reason: irrelevant
Post edited April 11, 2016 by eVinceW21
avatar
retsushi: I think people should get a life and enjoy the game.

And no offense to you, most people from USA are a bit retarted regarding trans, gay and even nudity. After all, the nipplegate scandal at SuperBowl was really joke.

And like I said no offense to any open minded american here, it's just this kind of talk don't happen where I live, people just don't care if somedody is different.

So yes I support Beamdog, I am glad they were able to make an expension to BG. It's there 1st game on their own, and I do hope they make more, getting better at it.
No offense taken, since most people from Canada are pretty sad regarding most things.
For a game about a bunch of social outcast, the amount of hate in this post is astonishing...
You guys must never save Viconia in BG2 before she looks "different"
avatar
shenhan: For a game about a bunch of social outcast, the amount of hate in this post is astonishing...
You guys must never save Viconia in BG2 before she looks "different"
If you look at the Forgotten Realms lore, and the bit about the drow. There are hundreds of reason not to save her. The drow said the surface and slaughter people just for the fun of it. Children and infants included. 99% of the race is pure evil. Hence why your reputation score drops as soon as she joins you.
avatar
shenhan: For a game about a bunch of social outcast, the amount of hate in this post is astonishing...
You guys must never save Viconia in BG2 before she looks "different"
avatar
Stig79: If you look at the Forgotten Realms lore, and the bit about the drow. There are hundreds of reason not to save her. The drow said the surface and slaughter people just for the fun of it. Children and infants included. 99% of the race is pure evil. Hence why your reputation score drops as soon as she joins you.
Your reputation drops because of other's perception of you. Viconia herself never really did anything wrong. There's that farm incident but she was brutally attacked first. If you look at her mannerisms you'll see she's a lot nicer than many "good" characters like Keldorn or Anomen (admittedly he starts out as lawful neutral, but holds good deeds as something sacred).
low rated
What disgusting display of narrow minded bigotry this thread has been
low-life and disgusting
I never save Viconia, neither in BG1 nor in BG2, since I'm only making good or neutral aligned parties. Even if Viconia is not guilty of the charges, she is still evil.
avatar
siddham: What disgusting display of narrow minded bigotry this thread has been
low-life and disgusting
Yet here you are commenting in it.