It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Siilk: Good luck custom sorting the library using tags. Will take you ages to tag every game and then ages more to change tags when you will have to put a new game in the middle of the list. Oh, but wait, you can't even do that. Because there's no tag sorting.
avatar
Fenixp: Filterering. Filtering was the correct term, sorry. And yes, it'll take time to organize but I'll probably find time to do just that eventually and it will help me navigate the library tremendously, the implementation of tags is definitely a lot better than on Steam already.
Filtering is unfortunately exactly opposite of what I need. I don't mind spending time to find what I need, I mind not being able to see what I have in the order I want it to be.

avatar
Siilk: And how about trying to go through all the pages to see what exactly you have in your collection? Not so easy, huh? Lot more clicking and waiting for the page to load, all of a sudden?
avatar
Fenixp: Actually, I found the GOG's implementation of seamless loading ... Weird on the shelf display. I'm not a fan of paging of the list display tho, it's not like it could ever grow that long and fulltext searching is good (that didn't work with the seamless loading either and I never know what was and what wasn't loaded, so pff)
Fulltext search is not really going to help if you want to see what you have while not looking for a particular name/tag/whatever. Or, you know, just enjoying the view of your stuff.

avatar
Siilk: Of which I see none that were worthy of butchering other completely unrelated functionality.
avatar
Fenixp: Oh that's unrelated, I'm just glad it's finally there. Took them bloody 7 years to implement.
Honestly, I have no objections whatsoever to having that. Same goes to all the other stuff: tags, search, sorting, even the godawful UI. But. I am seriously pissed of by the fact that adding all this new stuff came with removal of the existing stuff, without any good reason except for the whole "big redesign for the sake of it" thing.

avatar
Siilk: A good 80% of games I bought here were bought solely out of sentimental value as a collector's item, with no real intention to play them in any foreseeable future.
avatar
Fenixp: It's your money, I mean I have no right telling you what to do and how to approach life really and while I never understood collectors, I always respected them. However, is a digital storefront really a good place to do what you're describing?
It was till now, it's not any more. Hence me being pissed.

avatar
Fenixp: Just from purely practical standpoint I mean. First of all, at any point in time they can change the layout - just as they have proven right here and now. GOG wants to introduce skins, but ... Well ... You know, might not change much. Similarily, at any given point in time, GOG can just stop existing and your virtual shelf suddenly vanishes. The way I understand it, when someone collects something, that someone wants the collection to last, which is direct opposite of what internet and cloud functionality often stands for.
In other words, nothing's forever, especially in the internet? What else is new? Oh, and from a purely practical standpoint there is no reason to have a collection of anything anywhere. Collections are bulky and often expensive when physical, tend to eat up disk space and usually require special visualization software when digital and stored locally and as you mentioned, may easily disappear or be changed against your will when kept "in the internets". Neither way is perfect, unfortunately.

avatar
YaTEdiGo: and purchases work through pleasure, compulsive orders too, we got our brains stimulated to put order to our libraries, I know what I am talking about it, it is my job. Now we can just PLAY the games... sure, like we have time to do so...
avatar
Fenixp: Personally, I take far more pleasure from what I create than from what gets auto-generated for me. And when you use specialized software, everything is under your control - but it takes more effort, true. But don't blame me if I stop taking you seriously the moment you say "I refuse to put effort into what I want," because at that point, it probably wasn't so important to you in the first place.
Real life responsibilities, ever heard about them? Would've been jolly good for me to spend days after days after days just on picking the best software to create a neat little virtual collection of games/books/tv shows I like. But guess what, even if you like something you're not always have time for doing that if after all it's, you know, a hobby. So before hopping on a high horse and blaming someone for not loving something enough because of not doing X, consider if they actually *can* do X with time and money they have to spare.
avatar
liquidsnakehpks: nice that the wishlist has around 700+ votes already in such short time shows that people loved the old one
avatar
YaTEdiGo: nooooo, is just some people whining around in a post, LOL
You know that people like me voted there too? People who prefer manual sorting and a good looking shelf, but don't rage-quit GOG because of this minor thing? So, yes, it's 695 votes kindly asking to restore the old shelf and 5 votes from "some people whining around in a post" ;P
avatar
YaTEdiGo: nooooo, is just some people whining around in a post, LOL
avatar
real.geizterfahr: You know that people like me voted there too? People who prefer manual sorting and a good looking shelf, but don't rage-quit GOG because of this minor thing? So, yes, it's 695 votes kindly asking to restore the old shelf and 5 votes from "some people whining around in a post" ;P
I told you before, you are no one to tell me if I have the right to complain or not, or where or how spend my money or complain about, exactly, 700 people that doesn´t like the newlayout at all. Hope you can cope with that too.

Cheers.

PD: I am not interested in what you vote or not.
Post edited May 12, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
YaTEdiGo: 700 people that doesn´t like the layout at all
Wrong. I voted there too, because I prefered the old boxes and manual sorting. But that doesn't mean that I don't like the new layout at all.

avatar
YaTEdiGo: I told you before, you are no one to tell me or anybody where or how spend my money or their money, or complain about
*burp*
avatar
YaTEdiGo: 700 people that doesn´t like the layout at all
avatar
real.geizterfahr: Wrong. I voted there too, because I prefered the old boxes and manual sorting. But that doesn't mean that I don't like the new layout at all.

avatar
YaTEdiGo: I told you before, you are no one to tell me or anybody where or how spend my money or their money, or complain about
avatar
real.geizterfahr: *burp*
Good for you! thumbs up. Then what are you doing complaining about the people that complaints about it?
Post edited May 12, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
People complain about some silly things. It used to be that all you want from a digital store is access to the games you bought and ability to play them reliably. All this other stuff is extra. GoG's challenge will always continue to be dealing with a small minority (very small) that are die-hard old school consumers that are completely resistant to any change. Lord help you if you incorporate changes that exist at other stores because we can't have GoG try to evolve and grow it's business, it much continue to be that small special snowflake/little engine that could digital store. Everyone seems to praise GoG users on these forums but I'm not seeing a whole lot of difference between the type of whining that goes on here vs. the type of whining that goes on over at Steam (or any other message forum).
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Good for you! thumbs up. Then what are you doing complaining about the people that complaints about it?
Learn to read. I didn't complain about you. I just said that not every vote on this wishlist entry means "GOG U SUCK I HATE YOUZ!!!!!"
avatar
HornyRhino: oh and worse of all you now have to switch pages unlike before where you just keep scrolling down? who designs these?

kids?
Yes.
It was Take Our Children to Work Day at GOG
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Good for you! thumbs up. Then what are you doing complaining about the people that complaints about it?
avatar
real.geizterfahr: Learn to read. I didn't complain about you. I just said that not every vote on this wishlist entry means "GOG U SUCK I HATE YOUZ!!!!!"
If you were able to read well you should discover that i never said that LOL, but i repeat I stopped buying games the moment I see the library gone, SO WHAT?
avatar
0Grapher: Thanks for sharing. :)
Darkadia hasn't got a manual sorting function, though. Or am I missing something?
avatar
Nirth: Sadly no but there's a planned Darkadia Pro feature that will offer "Multiple Collections". With that I suppose you could create separate collections but they won't be sorted into a manual order but by the pre-existing choices (date added, rating, community rating, release dates).
Thanks anyway. :)
As I never sort anything alphabetically, ever, (:) I mean it) I don't really understand how a "shelf" can be useful at all if you can't sort the contents yourself.
And implementing that feature couldn't be so hard: If you can sort your games by the date you added them then why can't you just simply say you added a certain game later so that it is displayed further down on the shelf?
high rated
No more purchase until resolved...

Please vote:

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/keep_or_bring_back_manual_sorting

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/bring_back_game_boxes_in_the_game_shelf

http://www.gog.com/wishlist/galaxy/manual_sorting

avatar
bad_fur_day1: That's a confirmed two sales lost for Gog because of the "awesome" new shelf design. I suspect there will be a few more before this is done.
avatar
Fuz: I'm a strong believer in the "vote with your wallet" philosophy (that's why I don't use steam), so you can add me to the list.
+1
Post edited May 12, 2015 by xenocidic
low rated
Sorry, bro... but I just don't care.
avatar
brookstech: Sorry, bro... but I just don't care.
I don´t care that you don´t care. Next.
avatar
Siilk: It was till now, it's not any more. Hence me being pissed.
No. No, it was not. Even until now, you've had no control over this content and GOG never made any guarantees of keeping the game shelf as it was - in fact, they never even mentioned it as priority.

avatar
Siilk: In other words, nothing's forever, especially in the internet? What else is new?
So you knew all along that this could happen and now are upset about it?

avatar
Siilk: Oh, and from a purely practical standpoint there is no reason to have a collection of anything anywhere.
Of course there's a practical reason for collecting stuff, don't underestimate what you like, it makes you who you are.

avatar
Siilk: Real life responsibilities, ever heard about them? ... So before hopping on a high horse and blaming someone for not loving something enough because of not doing X, consider if they actually *can* do X with time and money they have to spare.
Don't do that. Look, if you have so little time, I suggest you stop wasting it on arguing here with me. The time you spent writing these posts you could have spent creating a virtual collection instead - so do me a favour, don't reply, and go do something that makes you happy.
high rated
If I may, add the link for manual sorting in the Galaxy section of the Wishlist. The way things are going, I suspect that if that entry gets enough votes it may be considered by GOG, and since the account system is the same on both Galaxy and the site, the non-Galaxy user will also get it back.
Just a thought.