I would certainly reconsider my position on him, but I still find the points he raised to be good. In the eventuality that you flip town it doesn't immediately mean that anyone who doubted that alignment is automatically scum

Well I'm clearly letting the side down then... I'll be interested to know what I've done.

Sounds good to me. Assuming, of course, that his wagon doesn't fall apart at the last second. He seems to be catching up fast though, so don't rush it. Maybe just before you go to bed tonight?

-----

Post 494, in the section about roles. I only stated that I submitted a bid.

And re-reading that post, I just realized I said "Roletracker" instead of "Role Cop". -.-


Here it is. Bolding is mine: Technically, he didn't say "game of wits", but anyone that is going to hold that against him needs to read this.

-----

Almost 25% done. I'm interested in hearing what else you come up with.

-----

Might be interesting to flip that as well, and read it as if JMich were definitely town.

I don't know that either one definitely is, but my scum list is kind of full at the moment.

and

Interesting that you both missed the point of my question, but nice of you Bookwyrm627 to come to yogsloth's defence. I'm not questioning the fact that yogsloth spoke of a game of wits, I'm questioning how any of what is stated in that paragraph demonstrates his claim in post #251 of "how most of us dislike" that it's such a game.

So, yogsloth, care to explain how that paragraph supports your claim in post #251?



I agree, trentonlf participated in quite lively discussions here. My question is - what discussions were they? Going over his posting history, most of it is his debate with yogsloth, another part is addressing others, again on the subject of roles discussion and/ or his debate with yogsloth, and we all know how what the epilogue of his posting was. Still, I may be missing something, so could you point out what other discussions he was part of? As in what discussions that would allow to gather info from outside of the above topics?


So, if you consider that cristigale and I are a bit absent, and require watching, what would you say about yourself? Would you also watch yourself given your posting history?

Ahhhhhh, my apologies, I get it now.... what a horribly-worded post on my part!

This is why punctuation is important.

Try this:

I said way back in post #8, that so many of you disliked, that this would be a game of wits.

Commas. They save lives.

Ahh. I answered the question you asked ("could you point out where in post #8 you said that?"), since it was a fact based question to which I knew the answer. And I suspect I know what Yogs' response will be to this clarification on your part. His phrasing could (again) use work; try reading the sentence like this "I said way back in post #8 (that so many of you disliked) that this would be a game of wits."

If I'm wrong, Yogs, please let us know your actual response.

Dang. He used commas instead of parenthesis.

Lets's eat Grandma!

Considering my brain did not recognize it was to be the lowest whole number until after I sent my PM. Yes I did at the time. The second I re-read I knew no. I had a better change of guessing the pick 6.

Technically alive- I rescued them. If I was alive so were they.

I was using the QTs for examples of time I have spent with Flub.

Flub as the mod. He was adding to the thread as a mod but yes that itself can be looked it. It would be hard to not look at a person as a whole and just from game to game. I do understand different games means different ways to go about playing but you still get the underlining feel from someone. Almost a sense of there personality. I dunno if im exampling it right.

Honestly - can you re phrase this. I am not sure what you are asking..
--- "How would you evaluate repeated prodding of other players to start/ do the talking, while also pointing fingers to the same players at every chance? "

Well, I guess it is time to Unvote: Sage
and,
Vote: flubbucket
I hope it's for the best.

Whew. I was rather worried that someone might hop off at the last moment or someone might say "Don't hammer yet, we have a little time left to talk" and we'd end up with no lynch at all.

So we have a hammer. Day Three will likely start during the weekend, might be a slow start.

I hope the pug makes another appearance.

OK. We have a hammer. Let's hope we hit true this time!

There will be deadline soon, right?


I am still on D1 (but close to end) and flub and Leonard are clear scum so far. Yog and bookwyrm are next.
Yog's post upon AFP unvoting Rob how he is derailing wagons and supports nolynch is awful.

Lift still town, JMich too.

Rest undecided, adalia closer to scum than town but not by far.

Guh, I posted from quick reply from page 7 without checking last page and missed the lynch. At least I will have more time to read. I am fine iwth flub's lynch. He is playing his poster scum play. Jumping on someone for mistakes or supposed mistakes while he usually knows better as town.

You said in your post #699 [emphasis added]: What about those that post but the content of their posts consists either of prodding other players to start and/or do the talking or drawing attention to a very limited pool of players? Would you consider such posts as allowing to get reads on their poster(s)?



Which reminds me, I have another question for JMich:

While the former part is valid, are you suggesting to leave the non-posters in peace until they decide to post on their own?