Posted May 06, 2015
cristigale: Now it was not that yogs voted for flubb, but the reason for voting: poor formatting. Really? Yogs followed up later after being called on it. But it still stood out to me. This felt more like scum too eager to jump on a wagon than town.
yogsloth: Hmmm, missing the point on purpose or just being unfair? My vote for flub is not because of one poorly-formatted post. Does that really make any sense? I believe I've mentioned this already.
I noted that you provided better reasons later (after you were called on it). My vote was not placed just because of the flippant vote. Prior to this vote you were at the top of my scum list (starting with post #578) but you didn’t seem scummy enough to vote unless it was needed to secure a lynch. As mentioned, your vote seemed like scum seizing an opportunity to jump on a wagon. It was a tipping point, which in turn made my previous suspicions stronger.
yogsloth: In fact, you did a pretty good job of explaining flub's continued pattern of unhelpfulness and question-dodging yourself. Why did I vote for flub? Why did any of the votes he's picked up vote for him? Because he's been evasive and unhelpful, and not playing a very pro-Town game.
(emphasis added) I agree. I stated that I see flubb scummy enough to switch my vote. However, as also stated, you seemed scummier, hence the vote.
yogsloth: Actually, since I already have a couple of votes, can I accuse you of looking like scum "eager to jump on a wagon"?
If flubb turns out to be scum, then I can see why you might think that. I placed my vote with the player I found scummiest. I find it bad play to not draw attention to that person. I still think yogs looks scummiest, but flubb looks scummy enough to vote. I don’t see anything in his most recent posts to change that.
Unvote yogsloth
Vote flubbucket