adaliabooks: [...]
JMich - quite a fence sitter, slightly lurky. I think he's made some good observations though.
[...]
Could you please post a summary of the good observations that JMich made that:
1. Were not part of his debate with yogsloth.
2. Don't fall under "general advice/ lecture on mafia game logic"?
Bookwyrm627: [...] and I claim to have bid (with no further information provided yet). [...]
Really? I'm not done doing a proper reread on you, so please point me to your post that this happened.
Sage103082: I bid my favorite number. I picked it because I thought it would be a fun role to play. The QTs would be from the Space game - Sage's Medical Bay and the milk game - Got Milk?
Did you think you had good chances to win the bid going with the number 18?
Were players in the Sage's Mecidal Bay alive or dead? If the latter, do you think that players still in the game (re)act the same way they do in the QTs?
flubbucket was the mod of the Milk Game - do you take into account flubbucket's behaviour as a mod in the QT to make comparisons and judge his play in the actual game, and why?
Sage103082: Not posting and disappearing. How can you get a read on someone who is a ghost. The players you can get reads and feels for are the ones that post so the ones that do not have a better chance of being put at neutral or town because they have not stirred the post or gave much to be looked it.
How would you evaluate repeated prodding of other players to start/ do the talking, while also pointing fingers to the same players at every chance?
@yogsloth
You claim in your post #251 that
I said way back in post #8 that so many of you disliked that this would be a game of wits.
I've been over that post mutlitple times now, and I can't find it; could you point out where in post #8 you said that?
I do see though that in your post #8 you said
I’d like to ask you a few questions…
Could you sum up that activity of yours and what you believe to have accomplished?
Also, in your post #251 you said:
We must lynch. Even if we hit Town, the analysis of the wagon will be crucial, as it is one of the few tools we know to be available to us
I've been through your posts, I was unable to find your analysis (nor your comment on Lifthrasil's attempt at one in his post #460). Then again, you post a lot, so I might have missed it, in spite of using adaliabooks' script. Could you point me to it?
JMich: I do tend to read what is posted, though yesterday I didn't open the thread at all. I do need to read the thread again to see if day 2 posts change the day 1 posts, but it does require some peace of mind to do that properly.
Is it reasonable to assume that you're done with your reading? Is there anything you'd like to comment on? I see that you only committed to reading the thread, but thought I'd ask anyway.