You think that what I have said is not logical.
To me, what I said seems completely logical. Therefore, I am not sure what you mean by logic.
There's something you call
valid reasoning and
(if you mean anything close to what I mean by logic) you should prove that my reasoning is either not valid, ignores important requirements for what I am saying or is not applicable.
Let me explain that no author of any dictionary has the authority to decide what's the true meaning of a word. What the authors do is to look at many samples of the language they describe and only describe what they see as best as they can.
It is impossible to describe everything and that means it is not a good idea to say every meaning that is not recognised in a dictionary does not exist.
What is more, there is no original meaning of a word. If at all there are many original meanings of a word that most probably have all been lost in the past. In fact, it is much more difficult than I explained here.
How do you determine the original meaning of a word? You can only do so very vaguely but the problem is that the original meaning probably wasn't vague.
Goodaltgamer: You even highlighted the most important part: reference
You did that.