yeah, i only a have a couple minutes so i promise to get to Catte's query later.
excluding the flavour which was the same both N1 & N2
N1, i got
YOGSLOTH IS NETWORKED CONDITIONALLY MURDEROUS.
N2 I tried bookwyrm because
a) he was parroting my thinking/saying what i was thinking better than i could/he
got me, iykwim.
b) he was logical
c) I was concerned about being tunneled on
my results were,
Didn't work.
I wish I had gone for Lift or GR as they seem scummiest off the tip of my head/tongue of everyone left.
I expected to be the NK, and so i didn't put a ton of thought into my Night Action choice, more's the pity.
I would never have dared, in a 2 player scum game, to risk 1/2 of the team--blasting a seemingly-near-universally-read town player into oblivion--to town-read the guy who already looked scummy. Also, coming literally out of the gates on D2 going "oh, look everyone, this guy--my teammate no less--looks scum and nothing you can say or do can convince me otherwise" is very bad play for scum. Not to mention my very next post going "He's da scummzies and here's the proof of my investigation, vote him." is like...spectacularly bad.
No other town has mentioned a successful result. Roleclaiming unprompted to get my teammate yeeted--again upprompted--is what i would consider idiotic behavior in a game where i would like to think I could have very easily avoided being the D2 lunch. I think yogs would have avoided D2 lunch if I hadn't investigated him.
In the game where i was with Catte, I was on tenterhooks all the time and scared stiff. He probably recalls that, Y'all can go look it up. i would have
hated to be by myself, because i'm sure i would have flubbed it. (No offense intended, FlubBucket!)
I find lift somewhat scummy because somehow he thought Bookwyrm was scummy. I attacked Yogs for saying Book was scummy without reasons that i saw.
I thought everyone was town-reading Bookwyrm myself. YVVM.
Microfish_1: if he is conditional, than my speculation comes into play and it is harder to know he is guilty. I still thought he was based on his arguments not ringing true and other reasons that are kinda obscure off the top of my head but i believe i asnwered in post
if he is conditional town and got anything from wyrm, wyrm is ded
ettac orrazib si eman ym: Ok, I think I understand what you mean.
When you said:
Microfish_1: Assuming I'm imaginative, yogs saying he was not scum and did not get the target and is not conditional means he would, by default, be of Mason but he never said that.
ettac orrazib si eman ym: You meant he didn't say
any of that? It looked to me like you were saying he never claimed mason and that he really said all of the preceding stuff ("he was not scum and did not get the target and is not conditional"). I wanted you to point me to him saying that.
Also go to sleep!
GamezRanker: Now I wonder: should we town clear Micro or make them the next lynch or what? I mean i'm currently leaning more towards Micro being town, but the whole thing(micro's claim and vote for Yogs, the back forth stuff between Yogs and Micro, etc) could all be an act between a klever scum team as well.
ettac orrazib si eman ym: Could be. Would be spectacularly bold to do it unprompted... although Yogs is exactly the sort of scum player who might propose that kind of mutually exclusive gambit.
GamezRanker: Btw: my result for N2's analysis of Micro was "Failure", the one for Lift on N1 was "No Result". Dunno if Joe was just using new words each time he sent me a PM or if it means anything, though.
ettac orrazib si eman ym: Yes, I noticed something similar. I wonder if it's to do with the reason for the failure. Does "no result" mean there are no modifiers?
Neither of my 'results' were the same as you have written. Are you paraphrasing those at all?
@498 I was typing on a phone and autocorrect at stuff, but i'm getting a headache trying to read what i wrote so my apologies.
yogsloth: I can assure you I do not have any other chat link, and my action does not kill my target, as Mr. Wyrm is still alive
I read as "not mason" & "did not get the target", which was backed by
yogsloth: I got no result
I contemplating just holstering entirely after the dogmaus flip and not sending in any action, but in the end decided a chance at something is better than guaranteed nothing
And then just went “yeah, figures, of course”
Then,
yogsloth: To be clear, I am not a mason. I am a psychoanalyst, full stop. That's all it says. I do not have any modifiers that have been expressed to me.
I asked "how could this answer have been anything other than correct", and then Yogs was all
yogsloth: So either microfish is mafia intentionally blowing his cover just to get me yeeted, or he’s town and he’s this:
JoeSapphire: imaginative - receives correct result among randomly selected results
yogsloth: However if it’s the latter and the “randomly” selected results are access to chat and action kills target – both of which would have to be mafia....
So I started imagining, "what if I'm wrong and this isn't scum? How could I--can I--possibly be wrong?
One more thing:
Yogs rightly said that none of us know our own modifiers. How could I, as scum, know Yogs' multiplier well enough to mangle it verbatim? Would scum, on N1, investigate
themselves?I That seems far-fetched for me, but idk. YMMV
Does that answer your question ?
Also, apologies for post 492. I left
Microfish_1: but i believe i asnwered in post
in as a placeholder, forgot I had it, and made that a whole new paragraph without deleting the first phrase.
More thoughts later, if I have any more thoughts today. My braincells are bouncing around giving me a headache.