Syphon72: My point is that playing at a higher resolution with a game this old barely matters when it won't really affect how it looks. Honestly, it just makes part of the game look worse.
Here is the thing: you are playing a game made in 1998. This is not a modern game. This not even remaster of resident evil 2. That is bizarre statement. Go play the remake if you want real modern RE2.
There is probably more of reason as why they couldn't use the soucenext port. But you can make up things to that's okay.
How is that being lazy not disableing auto Aim? People would end up finding reason to bitch about. You're nitpicking which is fine but be honest.
I never said basic was bad but saying this version is basic is being dishonest. it's obvious by you're biased statement.
I'm not even saying this version is better than rebirth. Lol. I personally have rebirth backup on HD when I want to use. Fact I beat serval time using rebirth.
OK, i'm the one wrong here about the resolution. I tried GOG config in depth setting and I found out that GOG allow players to play in many resolution as per config. So my statement becomes false. I give one point to GOG.
For the Basic declaratiom. Make it playable on modern PC + bug fixing is "bare minimum requirements" so people would buy it and not complain.
- Sell Unplayable game is unacceptable and people won't buy it.
- Sell a game with a bugs is not recommend, buyers will be unhappy.
So GOG needs to do both of them so they can sell them. That's all.
That's basic that people should do when they're selling.
In my opinion, if you want people to not calling it basic, they need to do more than minimum requirements.
Since GOG offer Resolution change, yep, It's now a little bit more than Basic.
It's not much though cause it's already in the base codes of the DX9 wrapper, I believe (due to the same exe config).
So I'm taking back my word. GOG release is not that basic, but it's still a litte bit on a basic side.
It doesn't have to be a remaster or remake or something like allow mod loading like Rebieth.
Just adding more options or QOL so people can play it better on modern PC, in modern time.
For Example:
- Easier Language Change without re-downloading the game.
- In-game mode change without the need to close the game and execute another exe file.
It's 2024. Yes, what GOG offer is playable. But as Gemini said, it's not hard, and it's possible to do.
Due mode was already possible on Game Cube version.
There is no reason to keep people playing it like we were in 1998 when they can improving it.
Which GOG decide to don't do any of those. Cause they have to work more. That's it.
But yes, they don't need to. Since they already done the bare mininum requirements for selling it.
You thinks I'm nitpicking but i'm not. Since GOG already offer the bare mininum of what the product must have so it can be sell. I'm OK with it (and with this state it also allow people to convert it to SourceNext Version so I can say goodbye to pirating).
But since what we arguing is "Is GOG release is basic or not?", that's a different matter.
It's need more than what GOG offer to make me or other people to move it out from basic category completly.
You may think that "Oh GOG Jesus already make it playable on modern PC so this release is so godsent people shouldn't bad mouthing them". But me and other people didn't value GOG works the same as you. That's what why I'm argue with you. I thinks it's a common sense that if you only offer the bare mininum of what the product must have so it can be sell. It called basic. That's it.
If I buy a soap, and that soap can clean my hands, it's bare mininum. It's basic.
But if that soap also give me a bacteria shield for 12 hours plus skin caring with Moisturizer, those are more than mininum, which make a second soap leave a basic category completly.
Oh, about the auto aim. I think it's a standard that all game language should have the same difficulty. And Since I didn't play GOG vanilla, I don't care. But I saw people complaint about it. So I uses it as a point. I don't know if GOG are really lazy or not. But in my conclusion, if any developers didn't put more effort to make the game better when it's possible, I think they're lazy, not just GOG. I used this mind set not just for GOG, but also on Bethesda, etc. They sell us products, not giving us the games for free.