Dogmaus: You are scummy for your taking offence ...
So taking offence at insults is scummy now? ... Perhaps you should look in the mirror then!
Dogmaus: So now answer, what is scummy in my beheaviour?
Of course I can't answer for ZFR, but for me it was the way you reacted to your ridiculous reason for voting being called out. At that point it was no personal attack at you, ZFR just pointed out that you were wrong. To which you completely overreacted (check back and read your own posts, trying to imagine that it were ZFR who reacted in that way). To me that looked and still looks like scum constructing a flimsy reason to cast a vote and then panicking when being called out how illogical that "reason" was. Which is a typical error of inexperienced scum players. A Town player is often wrong and everyone is aware of that, so erring is not a big deal to a Town player. They can just speak their mind honestly. A scum player, however, has to construct "suspicions", that they know to be wrong. That increases the pressure and of course scum players try to avoid obvious mistakes in their suspicion construction. So, when called out to an obvious mistake, the guilty concience can induce one to over-reactions. Defending the faulty premise, to appear to have been genuine, instead of just admitting 'oops, I made an error'.
Look at how long and how much mediation from Pooka it took until you finally saw the flaw that everyone was telling you about. That is a kind of tenacity that can come from a scum mindset. ... Or you are just incredibly subborn as a person. I can't judge that, since I don't know you. I can only judge your behaviour and I prefer to account for your behaviour with your alignment and not make assumptions about your character as a person. Your behaviour fits the model of an inexperienced scum player caught at an error and therefore is the best lead we have so far.
