JoeSapphire: You didn't state the suggestion, but you put the two statements side by side in one paragraph under a single heading. If you weren't intending to invite comparison you did it wrong.
No I didn't. You're reading too much into it. Here is what I wrote:
"As for the people reading Pookina, Joe Town-read him, I slightly Town read him, Vitek found him a bit suspicious an nmillar found him suspicious (I'm going off memory here, correct me if I missed anything or got anything wrong).
Vitek and nmillar's read are pretty much NAIish. Both are smart enough to NK a player they "suspect" as scum for the WIFOM, and if they're Town, then anyone else could kill a player that these two scum-read to put suspicion on them.
But Pooka's flip makes me Town-read Joe a bit more. He Town-read Pooka very early when he had no reason to since Pooka's "whom would you target?" actions could be interpreted as role fishing. "
I kept the original linebreaks. I was analysing the people who had reads on Pooka. First I listed those people and their reads. Then I wrote the my conclusion (NAI) on the people who scum-read him. Then I wrote my conclusion (town-read) on the person who Town-read him. I didn't write my conclusions on myself since I know I'm Town.
So my paragraph can be summarized as:
Sentence 1: Those people read Pooka are: X, Y, Z and myself.
Sentence 2: X, Y who scum-read him are NAI to me.
Sentence 3: Z who Town read him is Townish to me.
I can't see how you conclude that sentence 3 should somehow imply the non-existant sentence that "people who scum-read Pooka = mafia" (which is also contradicted by Sentence 2). And that all this is a ploy made to suggest that I'm Town for Town-reading Pooka.
How would
you have written my conclusions about Vitek, nmillar and Joe so as not to imply any hidden meanings?
I really don't follow your logic.
But, whatever... make your own reads.