I wrote the word "Ditto" in reply to you, in a thread were you jumped in to make a remark about me (you talk about personal attacks) in a discussion you were not even participating in. This is your definition of "amok"?
Definition of "amok"?
In your discussion with the user "amok" you pretty much show this behavior where you are antagonizing other users which disagree with you. I found a thread where you got moderated and you were even antagonizing a moderator. You haven't even stopped there, but you were forced to stop.
The user who resurrected the thread is obviously opposed to this boycott, and OP, since he started his own boycott were he tried to hijack this one, which almost no one participated in (in the link you posted), and then came here to stir things up.
Said user is here since the beginning of this thread, see here: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/boycotting_gog_2021/post140
They stopped to participate here because they have a different definition of what is a boycott or not.
It's not hearsay to ask a question in a forum. You are not in a courtroom. Besides, you called it "spreading lies", and are now trying to wriggle out of it because you can't back it up. It's blatantly untrue. The question was answered, like questions are on a forum. Why ask in another forum about a release on GOG? A lot of other people were also asking questions about this in the forum, I don't see you attacking them?
Yes, it is spreading lies. They could have easily verified the statement. They had chosen to post this in the boycott thread instead. If there were this question about the modability there would be other places in the same forum to find out more about it. I already pointed this out.
You wrote " two representatives of the Zoom Platform are active". Please point me to this "community moderator of the Zoom Platform getting triggered by a statement about the store". The only one mentioning Zoom, besides anti-boytcotters, was Time4Tea.
Post 5764 is Zoom Platform's community moderator getting triggered by "Zoom is GOG alternative like GOG is Steam alternative."
I am not antagonising you, I'm responding to your posts in a forum, were you are setting forth untrue statements about me, and others.
I think HappyPunkPotato had a great question for you. Maybe you should give it a think, and him a response.
You are not participating in the boycott which is described in the first post. You have nothing to do with this thread here.
And neither do you?[/i]
Of course, you are antagonizing me. You simply can't stop.
Yes. I am not participating in the boycott. I simply provided some information which I think is very useful for everyone here. It is a contribution to two essential points. The discussion about the definition of a "boycott" and the reliability of the lists in the OP.
You see this and you continue where you left antagonizing me in this thread. In between you antagonized richlind33 in this thread and amok in the other thread. It is a clearly visible pattern. The reason why I am questioning your role in this thread is exactly your behavior. I don't care whether you are boycotting or not, but you are constantly attacking other users. I have said this now several times. You still chose to ignore it. I pointed out that it is against the CoC of the forum. You simply don't stop.