dedoporno: If they were that easy to figure out why did you ask for additional time knowing that the clock was ticking?
I never asked anyone to wait, though I did imply that it would be nice when I made my intention known that I was planning to hammer HijacK once I had completed my reads. I wanted to gt my reads out there, all in one place, in case I didn't survive the Night. Or, would you rather I just hammered and didn't bother with a list at all?
trentonlf: The odd behavior is from day one where all your responses are one word or just short and clipped after you voted dedoporno.
I explained this on Day 1. In short, it was because I wanted to gauge reactions. It was pretty much a flop.
trentonlf: I also wanted to hear more from you and the only way to apply any pressure from someone is to vote for them.
Fair enough.
--------------------------------------
Part of my trouble Today is that my prime scum suspect has been implicitly confirmed as town by the moderator. With RWarehall confirmed (at least in my eyes), I felt I need to go through the thread again to see if I had missed anything while I was so focused on him in the later parts of the Day. I didn't miss that much, so I probably should have bothered.
All that is really there to look at is the wagon on HijacK. It was a very rapidly formed wagon, and I think much of it was composed of players just looking to avoid No Lynch. The order of the votes was:
1) dedoporno
2) RWarehall
3) trentonlf
4) Robbeasy,
5) Bookwyrm627
6) flubbucket
7) adaliabooks
8) Sage
9) Krypsyn
I included myself in the list, as I had stated my intention to be the hammer. Feel free to remove me from that list if you don't think it is warranted.
The main questions for any post-wagon analysis is: Why did the wagon start (what were the reasons give by the first few voters), and at what point did it become viable/inevitable? These questions are particularly useful when the wagon was on a town player.
Dedoporno started the wagon in
post 473 stating that he was against no-lynching wanted to try 'something else'. It could be as he says, or he could be scum using this as an excuse to place a weak vote on someone he knows is town. If town, he legitimately wanted to scum-hunt and avoid a no-lynch; if scum, he was forming a new wagon at the 11th hour to sow confusion (or maybe even get a townie lynched). Both are plausible, and don't think starting the wagon is a good indication of alignment in this case.
In
post 489, RWarehall is the second vote on HijacK. His deciding argument seems to be that he agrees with dedoporno that his PM doesn't 'look like a template'. At the time, I thought it seemed suspect that he jumped on HijacK by using someone else's argument, but given occurrences Day 2, this was a false tell.
((My head is killing me. I'll finish this analysis up later today.))