trentonlf: RW, you had been saying Krypsyn is scum, do you still think that?
I still have him as scummy. It starts with voting Dedo right after Dedo claims an unspecified town tell. Who does that? And apparently without seeing the why first. As to Ixam, I do not see his actions as pro-town. In fact I found them even more scummy.
Let me explain. Let's go back to Witch Hunting. So one of the ways to tell if someone was a witch was to tie them up, throw them in water and if they float, they are a witch. The converse is when they drown, I guess they were not.
Ixam's suggestion was for people to vote for me, put me on the brink and wait to see if someone leaves the train, then both of us would be scum (witches). Had you followed Ixam's suggestion, how likely does it become for me to get pushed over the brink by accident and people then have to say "Oops, not a witch".
But overall, I don't see too many differences ever from a town or scum on the brink of a lynch. They both usually do the same things, both try to start trains on other people, and both protest their innocence. And looking at Ixam's posts I see nothing, besides the above, that I attribute as more or less scummy or town.
So, I don't give very much credence to Krypsyn's new analysis. But if someone would care to enlighten me on exactly what you see as Ixam's town actions, I'd like to know.
I will say this. I was the only one who seemed to agree with Dedo for a long time after mentioning the tell. Why the heck would I be going out on a limb for him? I had him as my #1 suspect. He contradicted himself a few times early in the game. Every time someone had something negative to say about him, they went on his scum list. He seemed to have a growing train of discontent. No smart scum would jump to his defense. Only honest town.
The fact's are. I was the first after Dedo's mention to catch that Bookwyrm dropped a variation of the word "loyal". I dropped a different variation in another post, so that we could try to confirm more than one person. (Then later dropped it again by accident as the word was stuck in my head).
But hey, I guess I'm just scummy to all of you. I feel I proved myself and if that's the best of your logic, we are in deep trouble...
I have yet to go back over the thread given the recent events, and maybe this isn't the right thing to say but....
Obviously, I would have preferred Option A (Ixam), as I still think he is the scummiest I see. Hijack was an Option B. I still think we might have benefited by it. As usual, Hijack went maverick. He starts spouting stuff, right and wrong. Like where he claimed town and scum PM's were the same except for a few words changed around. I re-read my PM after he posted that. My PM does not seem to easily be switched as he claimed. So, he exaggerated (lied) to enhance his point and likely got lynched for it. I'm not too sad. One less distraction.
So in this case, Option B, could have been worse. Only later will we see if Option A would have been a better choice.
I guess this differs from other sets of options A & B. As uninformed town, can one ever be so sure someone else is town, that option B is better than A?