It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
flubbucket: Because of the reason.
avatar
flubbucket: Yes.

Yes.

(There's two posts.....I read someone requested one somewhere)
You're not doing yourself any favours, you know that, right?



avatar
cristigale: I didn’t have a name at the start either. During day one, I asked RWarehall about it and he gave me one. I think he made it up on the spot, so I doubt it has any meaningful connection to my role.
Form what we got from the flips, and after RWarehall's comment on the matter, you doubt that there's any meaningful connection between your name and your role? I wonder if your name paints you in less than favourable colours, and you're laying the ground for when it is revealed - and I don't mean after you flip.


avatar
cristigale: You’re right. Flavour Cop is more fitting in both instances. Trent claimed Role Cop and I had it stuck in my head.
Emm... no, trentonlf did not [url=https://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_30_murder_they_wrote/post858]Role Cop.

Is it time to address the question I asked CSPVG also to you?



avatar
adaliabooks: Sorry for the lack of posting yesterday. I wasn't feeling it, and I was a little busy...

[...]
You forgot the "shameless plug" part. ;-P


avatar
adaliabooks: [...]

These are some good points... it's possible that trent's role is also (actually?) some sort of delayed Vig... but that begs the question of why would he reveal that fact, unless he needs flub to be booted off for losing his fee rather than being voted off? Or he's scum/neutral and just wants more people gone.

[...]
[emphasis added]

If he's a Town Vigilante, do you think that he'd lie about his role, especially after what happened last game? If he's scum or thrid-party he would be lying about his role, but that wouldn't make him a Town Vigilante.
So, how did you come to the idea that he may Town Vigilante, and a delayed one at that?

Could you clarify/ elaborate on the part I highlighted? I don't quite follow.


avatar
adaliabooks: [...]

Also, it makes sense that CSPVG and trent have similar roles as the flavour of trent's sounds like a thief / pickpocket, but why was CSPVG's flip Pickpocket whereas trent's claim is Role / Flavour Cop?
This is something that puzzles me too.



avatar
JMich: Flub's first reply to trentonlf was in post 836. From previous games, I'm under the impression that the flavor/role cops do take the items they find with them, though trentonlf does mention in post 855 that he only takes the items if he fails his check.

It is possible that flub also thought the same about the flavor/role cop taking the items, so he just mentioned the item trentonlf didn't mention, aka the money, or money's as trentonlf called them.
So, it's not possible that trentonlf, if he's town, he did not want to spill all the beans at once?


From what I've read (and not only on the MafiaWiki):

- Normal Role Cops don't take anything from their targets.
- Normal Flavour Cops also don't take items from their targets.
- Normal Thieves do, and that's what distinguishes them from Flavour Cops.

Now, it looks like we don't have the standard normal roles in play, so here's a thought:
CSPVG was a Scum Pickpocket, so if he was a Thief who took items form his targets without being detected, then the town equivalent acting similarly (acting like scum and stealing items) could explain why the negative utility is triggered.
If CSPVG was also detected under certain circumstances, then the meaning of the twist could be something else entirely.

Additionally, trentonlf claims to have no control over the twist in his role, and he also claims to not know what determines his pass or fail of RWarehall's check (also unknown), which simply means that he's not given an option to decide on how to act.

And the structural difference in their name/faction/role line is still quite puzzling.
Well, he did mention role cop , even though he claimed it was [url=http://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_30_murder_they_wrote/post250]a mistake

avatar
HypersomniacLive: So, it's not possible that trentonlf, if he's town, he did not want to spill all the beans at once?
Do you recall why he was lynched last game? Do you think he would be eager to repeat said mistakes?
avatar
trentonlf: When I asked RW about the money last night he said there would be flavor ramifications and he would post it in his nightly commentary.

I have only investigated one person so far so I don't know if it's always the same where I get items or not, all I know is my PM says Flavor/Role Cop.

@BlueMooner, I'm sorry to hear that. It sounds like your boss was not a very nice person :(

Also, again I am not seeing why people are suspect of Kryspyn. But to be honest no one stands out a whole lot right now so I'm not sure who to look at.
Did you also get any clue as to what flub's role actually is? Or what are you thinking it might be?

Judging by the descriptions of the items you got they could suggest either some kind of cop, a jailer or some kind of fugitive role...

What you've found doesn't necessarily clear flub, and depending how you look at it could suggest he is some sort of criminal just as much as it suggests he is a cop...
Admittedly combined with his avatar hint it would look like he is some kind of cop (or jailer? I don't recognise the character or what his exact role might be), it's unlikely he will have gotten a description of the items you took until you took them so he couldn't have chosen his picture based on that...

avatar
HypersomniacLive: You forgot the "shameless plug" part. ;-P
What? Me? Plugging my new script? I don't know what you are talking about.. I was just explaining away my absence :P

avatar
adaliabooks: [...]

These are some good points... it's possible that trent's role is also (actually?) some sort of delayed Vig... but that begs the question of why would he reveal that fact, unless he needs flub to be booted off for losing his fee rather than being voted off? Or he's scum/neutral and just wants more people gone.

[...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: [emphasis added]

If he's a Town Vigilante, do you think that he'd lie about his role, especially after what happened last game? If he's scum or thrid-party he would be lying about his role, but that wouldn't make him a Town Vigilante.
So, how did you come to the idea that he may Town Vigilante, and a delayed one at that?

Could you clarify/ elaborate on the part I highlighted? I don't quite follow.
Well my thinking is that if trent has taken flub's money he might get booted off the show island (it kind of seems this will not be the case, but we only have trent's word of what RWarehall said for that), which would make it like a vig shot (or just a straight up kill). I never actually said he would be a town vig... if he is lying the assumption would be that he's not town.
I was wondering why he (if he were a vig rather than a flavour cop, and presumably anti town) would say anything about flub's possible role (to stop him being lynched). Why not just let flub get lynched if that's where things were headed? The only reason to speak up when he did (whether what he says is true or not) is to save flub; there are two reasons he might want to do that, if he is town and believes flub to be or if they are both scum or on the same third party team.
It was mostly speculation on what the other options might be if trent was lying (which doesn't look all that likely when you examine the other options)
Emm... that was in relation to yogsloth's role, not his own.


avatar
JMich: [...]

Do you recall why he was lynched last game? Do you think he would be eager to repeat said mistakes?
Fair enough. and he did say that he learned his lesson.
Still, if you go back and re-read trentonlf's posts, you'll see that he tried to support his belief of flubbucket's towniness by revealing the absolutely minimum necessary about his role and night-action. He could of course have put up an act on this front, but I won't dismiss it as being true, at least not yet.



avatar
adaliabooks: [...]

Well my thinking is that if trent has taken flub's money he might get booted off the show island (it kind of seems this will not be the case, but we only have trent's word of what RWarehall said for that), which would make it like a vig shot (or just a straight up kill). I never actually said he would be a town vig... if he is lying the assumption would be that he's not town.
I was wondering why he (if he were a vig rather than a flavour cop, and presumably anti town) would say anything about flub's possible role (to stop him being lynched). Why not just let flub get lynched if that's where things were headed? The only reason to speak up when he did (whether what he says is true or not) is to save flub; there are two reasons he might want to do that, if he is town and believes flub to be or if they are both scum or on the same third party team.
It was mostly speculation on what the other options might be if trent was lying (which doesn't look all that likely when you examine the other options)
From my understanding, Vigilane is a traditional town role, and RWarehall is not keane on the role reversal thing, so I'm not sure that he would throw in a Mafia Vigilante, and if trentonlf's third-party, well he wouldn't exactly be a Vigilante, would he now?

And while it is trentonlf's word on what our fallen God replied to his PM, RWarehall already made a comment on the matter.


I'm starting to wonder - am I the only one that reads RWarehall's posts?
avatar
HypersomniacLive: From my understanding, Vigilane is a traditional town role, and RWarehall is not keane on the role reversal thing, so I'm not sure that he would throw in a Mafia Vigilante, and if trentonlf's third-party, well he wouldn't exactly be a Vigilante, would he now?

And while it is trentonlf's word on what our fallen God replied to his PM, RWarehall already made a comment on the matter.

I'm starting to wonder - am I the only one that reads RWarehall's posts?
True. Like I said, it was speculation, following it through logically it doesn't seem likely, which suggests that trent's most likely telling the truth (or lying in a different fashion).

I don't think that entirely answers the question (besides, it doesn't match with what trent said, unless I misunderstood which night [real or game] he was referring to)

And yes, probably. Sometimes I think you might be the only person who reads anyone's posts... ;)
avatar
adaliabooks: True. Like I said, it was speculation, following it through logically it doesn't seem likely, which suggests that trent's most likely telling the truth (or lying in a different fashion).

[...]
That's where I'm leaning to myself.


avatar
adaliabooks: [...]

I don't think that entirely answers the question (besides, it doesn't match with what trent said, unless I misunderstood which night [real or game] he was referring to)

[...]
The lack of a standard in this matter does cause confusion sometimes.


@trentonlf

Could you clarify what exactly you mean by "last night"?



avatar
adaliabooks: [...]
And yes, probably. Sometimes I think you might be the only person who reads anyone's posts... ;)
Gee, that's encouraging. But could come handy when I'm scum. Or I should perhaps just follow your lead. "wink wink*
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Emm... that was in relation to yogsloth's role, not his own.
What was the comment two games back when I dropped the word "arsonist" in casual conversation? People like to discuss what they already know?

So true, trentonlf could have mentioned role cop back in day one because he is one. And people could have connected that to his role, thus ignoring the flavor part of it. His read from last night though is more of a flavor cop than a role cop read, so that does complicate things a bit more.

Make of that what you will.
avatar
JMich: Yay, I made it in the non-appearing section! I'll most likely also make it there tomorrow (Sunday the 20th), though it's not a certainty.
And while I do encourage people to post and discuss, I also encourage people to enjoy life and the weekend. Weekends are "free" as in, no one will be called out for not posting on any Saturday or Sunday.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: @trentonlf

Could you clarify what exactly you mean by "last night"?
I literally meant last night, I asked him before I went to bed. I also think RW meant each real night when he said nightly commentary.
avatar
JMich: What was the comment two games back when I dropped the word "arsonist" in casual conversation? People like to discuss what they already know?

So true, trentonlf could have mentioned role cop back in day one because he is one. And people could have connected that to his role, thus ignoring the flavor part of it. His read from last night though is more of a flavor cop than a role cop read, so that does complicate things a bit more.

Make of that what you will.
Yes, and apparently also (conveniently) ignore anything that followed. Or act as if they do. In spite them talking about them in quite some detail.



avatar
trentonlf: I literally meant last night, I asked him before I went to bed. I also think RW meant each real night when he said nightly commentary.
So, am I to assume that you didn't wonder about it when you first got your role PM, or at least when you got your N1 action PM? Why not?
avatar
HypersomniacLive: So, am I to assume that you didn't wonder about it when you first got your role PM, or at least when you got your N1 action PM? Why not?
I did not wonder about it because there was nothing mentioned by RW in my role PM or on N1 other than I took the money for my wife's treatments. I figured if there was some negative connotation with it RW would have told me in my PM at the start of the game. I would actually hesitate to investigate anyone, unless I was pretty sure they were scum, if there was a negative result possible as that could be bad for town.
avatar
flubbucket: Yes.

Yes.

(There's two posts.....I read someone requested one somewhere)
avatar
HypersomniacLive: You're not doing yourself any favours, you know that, right?
I know exactly what I'm doin'.
avatar
yogsloth: OK, I am Schultz. But I also answer to Schultzie, Officer S, or S-Dog.
So what is it you think the DVDs I found on flub mean? I am leaning toward this response.

@everyone, What are your thoughts on the DVDs I found? Should I have not said anything?
avatar
yogsloth: OK, I am Schultz. But I also answer to Schultzie, Officer S, or S-Dog.
avatar
trentonlf: So what is it you think the DVDs I found on flub mean? I am leaning toward this response.

@everyone, What are your thoughts on the DVDs I found? Should I have not said anything?
No, you were definitely right to tell us (I think...), if flub is town then we don't want to lynch him. If he is some kind of cop even more so.
Whether that's what what you found means is another question but we're better off knowing.
I never doubted that you do.


avatar
flubbucket: I wholeheartedly doubt the role block as much as I doubt the town cop claim.

I will gladly be lynched as long as the very next lynch is yogsloth.

yogsloth's arrogance and hubris lead me to think he's scum. He's willing to take the big gamble in order to dupe town because he's just that brilliant.

agentcarr16's "traumatized" prefix is valuable information.
OK, it's time I asked you this - you seem pretty convinced about yogsloth. Would you mind sharing which things give you this certainty? And I mean things other than his fixation with you.



avatar
adaliabooks: [...]
What you've found doesn't necessarily clear flub, and depending how you look at it could suggest he is some sort of criminal just as much as it suggests he is a cop...
Admittedly combined with his avatar hint it would look like he is some kind of cop (or jailer? I don't recognise the character or what his exact role might be), it's unlikely he will have gotten a description of the items you took until you took them so he couldn't have chosen his picture based on that...

[...]
Are you familiar with the films?



avatar
trentonlf: So what is it you think the DVDs I found on flub mean? I am leaning toward this response.

[...]
You are? Are you serious or joking?


avatar
trentonlf: [...]

@everyone, What are your thoughts on the DVDs I found? Should I have not said anything?
Since it was me that kept pushing you, to me it was useful.



avatar
yogsloth: [...]

Now, sine Trent spilled his entire PM in one go, we do need to figure out what it means. I have an idea... Instead of my ideas that are always wrong and nobody likes hearing, how about all YOU guys tell me what flub's role is and what it all means?
At this point, I'm extremely interested in hearing what YOU think on the matter.


I'd also like to know if HijacK's 24hrs are up yet or not.