Krypsyn: Thank you, Captain Obvious. :)
My point is that we can't really make any conjecture about the motives of his killer by what Darko did without getting into heavy WIFOM territory. Did the killer kill help because he was too close to the truth, as a red herring to only make us think he was too close to the truth, because they personally thought he was scummy (in the case of the vigilante). Every straight forward reason for his death could also have a reason based in misdirection. Later, once we have more context, we can revisit his death to glean better information. For now, the most we can really do it mostly baseless conjecture.
Really? Thanks for enlightening me, so many new informations.
You only said we
could look into Darko's votes and potes so I quickly did it. I have said nothing about how we should jump on flub now because of it. (but maybe we should for different reasons). Even if you try to discourage it so much it never hurts to looks into nk'ed played history of post and votes because tehre is alway chance it will tell us something. And beacuse certainly not everyone is going to do it, it never hurts to post who he voted.
Also, I hate anyone who killed Darko purely because he seemed interested in the game and it can slow it even more. :-/
Krypsyn: Also, for someone who thought it was 'not hard', you seemed to miss that Darko also voted for SirPrimalform briefly. ;)
Ah, that was stupid of me. I think I missed it when i was menitoning he voted him before deadline and where I was lefting out RVS where he voted him as well. I'll try to be more careful next time. :-p