mechmouse: Lets all ignore the issues, a pretent they don't exist. Just play our games. And when, a few years later you've found you've grown up and have children you can look at the whats happened.
darthspudius: What are you talking about... I did that ten years ago! The little bastards are playing my games now. Growing up well... that is no fun. Unless you want to become a Pirate. ARGH!
So you're kids are playing your Steam games, unless you've only got one computer or have got some time share going on you're using offline mode.
Great, that what most parent did before SFS, and likely do now.
I also believe you used to use No-cd cracks.
However, whether you want to talk about or not, anyone that has let their children, wife, bother, sister or so on use their account in the last 6 years was breaking the SSA. I doubt personal use could have ever stood up in a court of law, but it was written into the SSA.
The same goes for the DMCA. Bypassing the restrictions of a DRM, even by using in built functions is breaking the Law. Again, I doubt you could ever be taken to court over it, but there it is.
I don't think you believe I'm making this up, rather just see them as non-issues.
In away they are non-issues, since you can get around them and you're not going to going to jail over them. But they're the basis of a system that controls how you access the games you own.
My beef with SFS is it was supposed to deliver something it does not, yet many people believe it does.
I could mess around with ensuring kids always start in offline mode, and by the definition of both thd law and the SSA break the law, or I could use a crack and break the same agreement and law but means the games can be set up and left.