It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
ZFR: @mod Joe, how do subs look?

I really don't have the energy for this crap.
Please don't quit just because Dogmaus is stubborn and aggressive. Just ignore her as far as possible, keep analyzing what she writes but stop discussing with her. We both learned that that is pointless.

And @dogmaus: stop the personal attacks. They are unnecessary. If you really are that vindictive for having been 'attacked', you shouldn't play a game where being attacked, suspected and questioned is part of the game.
These posts:

avatar
ZFR: Did you write the above? Or your twin sister hacked into your account?
avatar
ZFR: *facepalm*
avatar
Dogmaus: Maybe if you dry the foam from your mouth and stop to breath for a second, you can read and think better and see that if you are Town you are building a house of cards on a couple of misunderstandings?
I do not like to read. They've caused me distress, and they've caused other players distress.

I have actively requested everybody to be nice to each other.

I would like for ZFR and Dogmaus to apologise to each other, and acknowledge that neither wants to cause bad feeling to the other.

If anybody thinks this issue needs to be discussed further please begin by PMing me, and we can mediate outside of the game.

I have updated the rules, adding in a rule 0. Please read and abide by it.
My intention isn't to reprimand or shame anybody. I am trying to be direct and clear, but I don't intend to be stern or bullying.

I considered doing mediation between you two off-site, but then I decided that public apologies shouldn't be a shameful thing, and rather should be a healthy thing that we can engage in a positive way.

But thinking about it I suppose that requires mutual understanding from everybody involved, not just for me to decided that on my own.

So bearing that in mind, can we all, not just ZFR and dogmaus, but all of the gog mafia community, can we try and get behind this thing and get a bit of good feeling going?

You are all more important to me, and your well being is more important to me, than the game is.
avatar
Lifthrasil: What does BBG mean? That's an abbreviation I'm not familiar with.
That is a reference to my accusing Yogsloth of playing ":Big Brain Gamez" (what others call 4d chess, etc--outthinking us or misleading to try and trick us, etc, idk the proper term) a few of [my] posts back.
low rated
avatar
Microfish_1: Yogsloth mentioned roles. This could be an attempt to play Big Brain Gamez, and so I voted him.
K

avatar
Microfish_1: Er, should this now be game 75? A 2-games-for-the-price-of-1 deal?
Imo it's more like game 74 3/4.

=-=-=-=

(Sorries for the delay in posting, y'all....been busy IRL. I am doing each player's posts......not all of them, of course....done with Micro, now onto other players in a bit)
low rated
avatar
Lifthrasil: Bookwyrm: nothing alignment indicative so far. Only thing off: accusing GR of lurking hard in Post 117. When GR has three times as many posts than Bookwyrm has.

True, GR feels less active than in some other cases. But still he is more active than some others. So lurking isn't the word I'd use.
Yeah, i've been busy IRL(taking care of elderly parent, finishing game backlog, etc)....so my posting has been cut down the past few months or so. Still, I have tried to post somewhat to the game, so that claim that i'm lurking seems a tad of a stretch.
low rated
avatar
Lifthrasil: Bookwyrm: nothing alignment indicative so far. Only thing off: accusing GR of lurking hard in Post 117. When GR has three times as many posts than Bookwyrm has.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Quality over quantity. Sure, he's got a lot of posts (he usually does), but nearly all of that is fluff or talking about your Post 20. Feel free to provide a summary of his contributions, positions, and analysis of the game state, and for the sake of comparison a summary of mine. For extra credit, indicate which one takes longer to complete and why.
One word: reaching
You should know as well as anyone other regular here how such analysis/etc isn't my strong and/or preferred suit.

That said, if y'all or anyone else wants to throw some votes/etc my way, then by all means....but do try to back it up with some good reasoning while doing so, k?
low rated
(No votes in this post)
=-=-=-=-=

avatar
JoeSapphire: You are all more important to me, and your well being is more important to me, than the game is.
What a fine sentiment.

avatar
JoeSapphire: So bearing that in mind, can we all, not just ZFR and dogmaus, but all of the gog mafia community, can we try and get behind this thing and get a bit of good feeling going?
Sounds good to me......let bygones be bygones and whatnot. :)

=-=-=-=-=
To Everyone

Welp, caught up(skimmed some of the posts, due to length and complexity)....still dunno who to vote for, though.
My gut says one of the ZFR/Dogmaus duo might be scum, but then again my gut has been wrong many times before....what to do. :\
avatar
Dogmaus: take a pause. It's not a job. I was asking you to chill. You only read what you want to read. Come back here when you feel better.
How about you listen to your own advice?

This was your reply to my very first post.

avatar
Dogmaus: again this weird strategy of
1 mispelling my name to cast an unvalid vote
2 intentionally misrepresenting my thoughts and words.

vote ZFR
I made one single post and instead of assuming good faith already you're assuming I'm intentionally mispelling your name and misrepresenting your post. I wasn't "obsessively" defending Lift at this point. I wasn't "attacking" you. I just made one post. One. Single. Post.

-------------

OK, I leave the thing about Lift alone. You're close to lynch. Books asks you to claim. I ask you to claim. It's a perfectly reasonable request. Your response.

avatar
Dogmaus: If you think it's good for town to claim, you can claim, I'm of course not helping scum to plan their first night killings! And I won't believe your claim, and you won't believe mine. You have made up your mind to vote for me anyway. If I claim you could even claim my same role later and have me killied manipulating the others. If I say nothing you will vote for me anyway.
Look, you don't want to claim, don't claim. It's a valid strategy. But stop making it sound like my request has some manipulative agenda behind it. It a standard thing to ask anyone who's close to lynch. And yes, most of them are actually believed. So stop assuming I won't believe yours before seeing it.

Jesus, not everything that's said to you is a frickin conspiracy.

At this stage I'm afraid to say "good morning" because it would be construed as another attempt at manipulation.


Now, I don't mind any of the above. It's a game of Mafia. Every player has the right to make any interpretations to what I say and draw any conclusions. Even absurd ones like those about misspelling names and scum falsely counterclaiming a Town claim.

But the personal attack was completely uncalled for. I misread Pooka's post, acknowledged my mistake and apologised for it. Was your response to it to dry the foam from my mouth at all necessary? How about you take a look in the mirror. You've been belligenerent towards me since my post 1.
And don't give me advice to "chill", "it's not a job" and "play checkers". I'll play Mafia the way I want, thank you very much.



avatar
JoeSapphire: I would like for ZFR and Dogmaus to apologise to each other, and acknowledge that neither wants to cause bad feeling to the other.
Aplogies to dogmaus for my twin-sister and facepalming posts. They were totally inappropriate. It wasn't my intention to cause any bad feelings, so sorry if my words made it so.

Apologies to Joe for creating this situation. Modding is hard enough as is and my behaviour only made it more difficult. It wasn't my intention to spoil your game in any way.

I'll finish the game so the sub won't be necessary, then I'm done here.
avatar
Dogmaus: you can't read properly, as you admitted.
I misread a post.

I can't read properly.

Yup. Those 2 statements are exactly same.
avatar
Dogmaus: "Was just being sarcastic. "Did your twin hack into your account?" isn't even close to the top of things that normally get said in GOG Mafia."
But suddenly you need special rules and play dramatic calling the @mod because I point out that you are so angry and confused that you can't read properly, as you admitted.
If you're going to quote me, don't pick a part out of context. Quote me fully.

avatar
ZFR: I didn't call anyone names (which I admittedly often do), didn't insult or disparage anyone. Was just being sarcastic. "Did your twin hack into your account?" isn't even close to the top of things that normally get said in GOG Mafia.

If the mod or the person involved think it's too much and ask me not to do it, I'll apologise and will do as they ask. You're neither however, so don't do backseat modding.
I don't need special rules. I said that if the person involved thinks it's too much, I'll apologise to them and stop. I won't tell them to chill and play checkers.

Good day.
avatar
ZFR: Aplogies to dogmaus for my twin-sister and facepalming posts. They were totally inappropriate. It wasn't my intention to cause any bad feelings, so sorry if my words made it so.

Apologies to Joe for creating this situation. Modding is hard enough as is and my behaviour only made it more difficult. It wasn't my intention to spoil your game in any way.

I'll finish the game so the sub won't be necessary, then I'm done here.
I did tell you to knock it off earlier but you accused me of backseat modding for whatever reason. Now that the mod tells you to, you don't just comply but also apologize?

Well, whatever. I hope next time, you (or anyone else for that matter) would not quickly resort to the "you're backseat modding" excuse while forgetting this is a community game and it falls upon us the players to make sure the game is civil, not the mod.

avatar
Dogmaus: Maybe if you dry the foam from your mouth and stop to breath for a second, you can read and think better and see that if you are Town you are building a house of cards on a couple of misunderstandings?
This was also unnecessary. For the love of everything, stop it with these snide remarks.


Ugh. I can't really get myself to bother about the game in its current state. And I already have to deal with some hardware stupidity over at my place, weeeeeeeeeee.
Pooka, I asked everybody to engage in this in a positive way - these comments are not helpful.

Please, if anybody has any issue with any of this talk to me first.
avatar
JoeSapphire: Pooka, I asked everybody to engage in this in a positive way - these comments are not helpful.

Please, if anybody has any issue with any of this talk to me first.
I'm sorry.

I have been dealing with some crap since yesterday, and seeing the status of this game right now upset me. But that's no excuse for my behavior.
avatar
Lifthrasil: What does BBG mean? That's an abbreviation I'm not familiar with.
avatar
Microfish_1: That is a reference to my accusing Yogsloth of playing ":Big Brain Gamez" (what others call 4d chess, etc--outthinking us or misleading to try and trick us, etc, idk the proper term) a few of [my] posts back.
OK. Upon re-reading Yogsloth's statement that his role didn't change is actually a 'I am still Town!' statement. We know who was scum in the previous installment of this game. So Yogs saying "My role didn't change! Seriously!" includes the implication that he (claims that he) is still Town. It's strange that Yog saw it as necessary to proclaim that he is Town.

But what is even more strange is that Dogmaus, who was all over me for an imagined statement that I might be Town now because I was Scum in the last game, did not see anything wrong with Yogs' much more direct "I am still Town" statement. Hm. Perhaps she's scum with Yogs after all and not with Pooka and therefore chose to ignore his statement. Or she was tunneling so hard on me and ZFR that she didn't read anything else.
(Happens. I didn't think much about Yogs' statement either)