It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
GymHenson: So i'm not in at least your top 2?
You hold special place in my reads.

avatar
ZFR: It was mentioned by yogs some time ago, then I believe it came up during trent's role madness and my last game when the whole Slytherin claim came up.
I don't think they are common but I have provided some once in of my games too.
I think it is possible given setup but overall it is quite unusual thing and I am more inclined to believe to be genuine.
Have Lift provided false claims in his previous games (I am not sure I played any of them)?

avatar
flubbucket: Well trentonlf stated himself in post #516 the possibility of "accidentally helping scum" existed.

So how do you feel about trentonlf's statement??
In sign-up thread the role specificaly talks about how that role has to be careful not to help wrong people.

avatar
JoeSapphire: I don't think is true! When I'm scum I do try to solve things and try and make it look like I'm scumhunting. And occasionally do a decent job of it.
I think it is!


avatar
ZFR: Yeah, this is bad. First post 146
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_70_the_shelter_a_fallout_game/post146

"ZFR: I think I'm so very town.
trentonlf: So what you're saying is you think you're town??
ZFR: Yes. How very town of you to notice. I think you are so very town as well.
trentonlf: Thank you. I think you are so very town as well."

Sure, trent's multi-agreements with me might seem strange, but the third line of flub's post is plain wrong. If you stretch trent's statements and I squint I can kinda see him Town-reading me with his agreements, but I I never townread him.
Why does this only bother you several days after it happened?
avatar
Vitek: You hold special place in my reads.
Yay!

Gh does a little happy dance around the encampment before going back to relaxing when others start giving him odd stares

Btw while you're here: what do you think of me hinting at my role(how you lean it, and any other musings) earlier, and how Blotunga posted in posts 567 and 569?
avatar
Vitek: .................

avatar
ZFR: Yeah, this is bad. First post 146
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_70_the_shelter_a_fallout_game/post146

"ZFR: I think I'm so very town.
trentonlf: So what you're saying is you think you're town??
ZFR: Yes. How very town of you to notice. I think you are so very town as well.
trentonlf: Thank you. I think you are so very town as well."

Sure, trent's multi-agreements with me might seem strange, but the third line of flub's post is plain wrong. If you stretch trent's statements and I squint I can kinda see him Town-reading me with his agreements, but I I never townread him.
avatar
Vitek: Why does this only bother you several days after it happened?
Well he did sort of clutch his pearls in post #479 regarding my post #146.

Do you think he's not being genuine??
avatar
flubbucket: Do you think he's not being genuine??
While yer here as well: Could you answer what I just asked Vitek in the post above yours? I'd like your thoughts too.
avatar
flubbucket: Do you think he's not being genuine??
avatar
GymHenson: While yer here as well: Could you answer what I just asked Vitek in the post above yours? I'd like your thoughts too.
Why in town's name would you "hint" at your alleged role??
avatar
flubbucket: Why in town's name would you "hint" at your alleged role??
I have good reasons....as I said I will not list them all as it would possibly ruin what I am trying to do, but the one reason I stated so far(that i will now repeat) is: It is a role that can very likely help/harm town or scum, and i'm sort of wondering if i'm more a help or harm to town while still alive and playing.

Also you forgot to tell me what you think about Blotunga's posts 567 and 569? Do you think they're more likely the posts of a town or scum blotunga?
avatar
GymHenson:
It was you who started it all. I was trying to figure out (loud) what would motivate someone to hint to a PR without any pressing reason.

Anyway we're heading for a no-lynch. Lift would kick our behinds if he were playing.
At the moment I see only the Vitek wagon having a chance of going somewhere, so if nobody has any other ideas, what do you peeps think about that? While I don't necessarily find him scummy, I'd maybe vote him to avoid a no-lynch. Ok, in the last game it did backfire, but every game is different.
avatar
GymHenson: Btw while you're here: what do you think of me hinting at my role(how you lean it, and any other musings) earlier, and how Blotunga posted in posts 567 and 569?
Certainly have no problem with blotunga talking about it because you were the one who brought it up so for him it was free game to question it.
Boobies.
Fair game, not free.
avatar
blotunga: It was you who started it all. I was trying to figure out (loud) what would motivate someone to hint to a PR without any pressing reason.
It still came off a bit as possible fishing for more info/my role....though I guess you could be town as well and just curious as to my own leaning.

As for my overall actions this game: I am still trying to improve a bit with each new game, if possible.

As to why I am not giving more info atm....I have more reasons for doing so, but I won't say atm.....might later, though, if I feel it is of help to town and/or prudent to do so.

I mean look at it this way: if you ran a pharma study on a new medicine, would you tell the one group they were taking the placebo? No. Why? Because it would likely taint the results and ruin the study.

avatar
blotunga: Anyway we're heading for a no-lynch. Lift would kick our behinds if he were playing.
If Trent picks poorly and gives scum a second night action a nolynch might not be such a bad thing...especially if Trent's pick is scum and scum then gets two NKs.

avatar
blotunga: At the moment I see only the Vitek wagon having a chance of going somewhere, so if nobody has any other ideas, what do you peeps think about that? While I don't necessarily find him scummy, I'd maybe vote him to avoid a no-lynch. Ok, in the last game it did backfire, but every game is different.
Well Vitek has done a few things that pinged my alarm bells, so i'd be up for it.

(He has ignored my calls for top lynch picks for my consensus, for one thing...not even to say something like "I am against such" or "I don't want to bother saying atm" or "I'd rather keep my list private for x reason")
avatar
blotunga: At the moment I see only the Vitek wagon having a chance of going somewhere, so if nobody has any other ideas, what do you peeps think about that? While I don't necessarily find him scummy, I'd maybe vote him to avoid a no-lynch. Ok, in the last game it did backfire, but every game is different.
Are you aware it consists of RVS vote, of vote I got because I was first to vote and of vote because I am apparently trying to get trent lynched?
avatar
Vitek: Certainly have no problem with blotunga talking about it because you were the one who brought it up so for him it was free game to question it.
One post, maybe, but his second post sounded(to me) like fishing to see what roles I might or might not be.

I mean if blotunga is town why "speak" such aloud and not keep at least the thoughts of post 5969 to themselves so as to not possibly help narrow down what role I am for scum?

avatar
Vitek: Are you aware it consists of RVS vote, of vote I got because I was first to vote and of vote because I am apparently trying to get trent lynched?
Hello LAMIST, my old friend.....i've come to read you once again.....

(Jokes aside, this seems a bit lamist to me...but I somewhat suck at this game, so I could just be chasing shadows that aren't there again)
avatar
Vitek: Have Lift provided false claims in his previous games (I am not sure I played any of them)?
I haven't seen false safe claims in any games I played. I've only provided a safe claim once for SK in my Harry Potter game, and that was a name safe fake claim, not a role one.

I really doubt Lift gave Mafia safe fake role claims.

The most likely explanation, given no counterclaims, is trent's claim is genuine and GH is Town who just want to claim his real Town role badly.

avatar
ZFR: Yeah, this is bad. First post 146
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_70_the_shelter_a_fallout_game/post146

"ZFR: I think I'm so very town.
trentonlf: So what you're saying is you think you're town??
ZFR: Yes. How very town of you to notice. I think you are so very town as well.
trentonlf: Thank you. I think you are so very town as well."

Sure, trent's multi-agreements with me might seem strange, but the third line of flub's post is plain wrong. If you stretch trent's statements and I squint I can kinda see him Town-reading me with his agreements, but I I never townread him.
avatar
Vitek: Why does this only bother you several days after it happened?
It bothered me as soon as it happened. I've written that in post 161.
avatar
GymHenson: (He has ignored my calls for top lynch picks for my consensus, for one thing...not even to say something like "I am against such" or "I don't want to bother saying atm" or "I'd rather keep my list private for x reason")
I told you I found your reasons to do it appaling. I would think it would be more than enough of answer considering you accepted flub's "I don't have any" as valid answer.

avatar
GymHenson: One post, maybe, but his second post sounded(to me) like fishing to see what roles I might or might not be.
I mean if blotunga is town why "speak" such aloud and not keep at least the thoughts of post 5969 to themselves so as to not possibly help narrow down what role I am for scum?
You were the one going "hello, look at me, I have a role! It's great! Look! And there is much to talk about. What you are talking about it? You scum!"
In #569 he was accusing you of possibly being scum. I would recon that was his reason for voicing it out loud.

avatar
GymHenson: Hello LAMIST, my old friend.....i've come to read you once again.....
That's not lamist.
Like at all.
The same way you could say it is drunken rambling. Because it has nothing in common with either.

avatar
ZFR: The most likely explanation, given no counterclaims, is trent's claim is genuine and GH is Town who just want to claim his real Town role badly.
How does it influence GH being town?

avatar
ZFR: It bothered me as soon as it happened. I've written that in post 161.
Yeah but there you just called it fictin and didn't botehr with flub any more than that and several days later you come with it in dramatic fashion ("Yeah, this is bad"). Thanks to it being aimed at you originally and you reacting to it, you were clearly aware of it but only brought it up as thing against flub now.