I frankly didn't expect the scum to kill gogtrial.. he has been basically always wrong with his choices lol.
Also, RIP blotunga.
We're down to 8 players now..
Well, yes, he was wrong with his choices. So were we all. At least all of us that participated in the lynches. But gogtrials efforts appeared genuine to me, so I still had him as Town.
But yes. If we mislynch again AND the NK goes through, then we lose, if scum started with 3 players. Which is a reasonable assumption since we started with 12 players and 1/4 is the usual scum faction size. In any case it's a safe assumption and we should act as if we were at MYLO.
Vitek is there mainly because of their stealing the hammer from me, somewhat preventing Blotunga from having more time to post their reads/leans on players and other info before the end of the day(D2), even though I had stated I would hammer and we had time left for me to do so. Add to that this little "odd" thing:
Why would Vitek, who seems to suspect me(if their last posts to me on D2 are anything to go by) vote for my intended vote/hammer choice and hammer them themselves if they're town!Vitek? Why didn't they let me hammer, look bad for doing so, and let me be suspected more the next day(today-d3) if they suspect me?
This line of reasoning doesn't make much sense. Suspecting someone for kill-stealing is a very strange reason. And your second argument rather is one for Vitek NOT being scum. Only scum would have known that the lynch would be a mis-lynch. So, to be able to let you hammer, knowing that you would look bad for it, Vitek would have had to be scum. He didn't let you hammer to make you look bad. So by your own reasoning he acted in a way that would have been stupid for Scum!Vitek.
I'm not defending Vitek. (it is WIFOM, after all) I suspect him too, mostly for his low presence and low effort. However, you pick up on the entirely wrong reason for your suspicion. Again. Which makes me wonder again if this is usual GH-anti-logic or whether there is intent behind it. Trying to make a case against someone who is rather suspect anyhow.
But yes, the fact that Vitek felt the need to hammer right away even though he was around for the remaining minutes is a bit anti Town. He wrote that blotunga was offline at the time. Can anyone confirm that?
Btw we had various players not partecipating much in this game.
I hope they're not scum, because it would just be a boring reveal..
That's true. I hate lurky scum. It's such a low-effort way of staying under the radar. Active scum is much more fun to play with.
my name is magike catte: GymHenson:
I don't see Vitek's hammer as particularly AI.
So you don't see anything amiss with someone hammering when another player said they would do so in a few moments?
No, not if that other player could be scum and therefore there was no reason to trust that player's announcement. Keep in mind: all others have to see you as potential scum. Hell, maybe you ARE scum and were trying to 'accidentally' let the Day end in a no-lynch? Is that the reason you are so irked about the 'kill stealing'? In any case, as I and others have said before, if you are Town, that is a really strange thing to take as a scum read. You contradict your own reasoning.
Hardly fishing. I've outright told Catte to spill the beans.
It's odd no one has tried to lynch me or form a major wagon on me over the past few "days"....normally I would've been close to lynch at least once by now...don't you find that odd?
Not at all odd, if you are scum. The point is, when you are Town, you are awfully easy to abuse as mislynch-wagon target. Your quirky way makes it easy to make you look scummy. So, 'normally' as you put ist, there would have been a major wagon on you because scum can easily start a wagon on you or add to it, if one randomly forms. It would also be a quite forgiving wagon, since 'he looked scummy' is easily accepted when it refers to you.
So yes, if you are Town it is odd that no one has tried to mis-lynch you. However, if you are scum, it totally makes sense that your scumbuddies wouldn't drive a lynch-wagon on you as long as Town-targets are available. Thanks for pointing that out!
Now, would Scum!GH accidentally make such a point against himself? ... Maybe he would. In any case you're trying your best Today to demolish the Town-reading that I had of you Yesterday! If you are not Scum, would you please explain to me what your conclusion from the 'no wagon on you' observation was? I mean, you probably did not mention that observation to make a point against yourself. So what WAS your point?