supplementscene: 4. I asked what chance there was of a Roleblocked, IIRC it was Joe who said 5% chance. 5. I moved back to Gameragers wagon on the final day after being told the 5% was for each roll and it multiple times.gogtrial34987: June 21
The only options open to me, were A) Gamerager B) Scene. I thought GRs play suspicious enough to go with him over No Lynch.
All of this started with dedo mistakingly claiming that the odds of RB were lowest due to Bs only appearing in the 96-100 range ( #620
At step 4., what you write is "So to clarify the odds of a Town Roleblocker coming up is either 3% or 4%?" ( #623
Joe corrected that shortly afterward to 5% ( #625
I explained shortly afterward that the total chance of RB was 30% ( #628
To establish that you were around: You posted again a while later without saying anything about this ( #645
Bookwyrm returned to this point a while later and confirmed my math ( #656
) June 22
At step 5., what you write is "He has claimed a role that there's a 95% probability isn't in the game." as the main reason for voting GR ( #684
Microfish immediately points out that two people said that it's 30% ( #685
Joe also points out shortly afterward that the percentage is way higher, claiming it's "more than 60%" ( #687
You immediately write "I asked someone who I'm pretty sure replied 5% chance of a roleblocker being in play. If you can direct me otherwise I'll look at my vote again."
Joe immediately does a roundup of the steps dedo, you, himself, me which I also listed here, again writing "more like 60%" ( #689
Joe shortly afterward corrects the percentage to "30ISH% chance" ( #691
I shortly afterward also point this out to you ( #694
You never show up again. GR gets lynched. And now you portray things this way.
It's not your vote for GR itself which I take offense with. It's your bad justification of the vote at the time, despite having been told multiple times what the percentages were.
And more than that, it's the way you now portray what you did as "I was told 5%" and
"I voted GR after I was told it was 5% for each roll, because it was GR or no-lynch".
You're trying to rewrite history, and failing. Either you knew at the time it was 30%, and gave a bad reason for voting because you felt you needed stronger justification (which is scummy), or you didn't know it was 30%, but then are now portraying things as if you did know and had no choice to vote (which is scummy). vote scene
Welcome to L-1. Do you want to change your VT claim?
While all this is true and highlights errors it ignores my prior reasoning for being the first to start GRs wagon and it ignores the fact I prefered to be on Joe's wagon.
I don't have anything new to claim no.