Dessimu: E'hem...
Docbear... Anyone?
I didn't have time to reply to this before the day ended. I agree with drealmer that a lot of what you pointed out could be attributied to docbear being new. But there are a few things, that perhaps I may have glanced over because of the same reason (being new.)
Based on the context of posts (#195 - #246) Docbear first appears to follow RWarehall's lead and vote for you. And then seems to follow you to vote for RWarehall due to RWarehall's semantics. Opportunistic?
@docbear - On day one, what changed between your vote for dessimu to your vote for RWarehall?
I did originally take note of this post:
- #382 - "JMich has also made his way onto my radar.", "For town's sake, I can't afford to be wrong again."
The wording struck me funny. At the time, that was the only post by docbear that had caught my attention. Not much by itself.
For now, I'm moving docbear out of my, I-doubt-they-are-CL list and into the possible-suspect pool.
It would not have changed my vote yesterday after JMich basically stayed silent.