Bloody internet connection! Got sick and tired seeing that "connecting" and "waiting for gog.com" every time I try to open something in a new tab.
ZFR: [...] What's your definition of "considered" then? Here is what you wrote after I fully explained my idea:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/captain_sapphire_the_movie_gog_mafia_57/post448 "OK, I misunderstood how you're tying in his D1 play.
It's possible, I'm just not sure how likely it is." (emphasis mine)
I'd say that fits the definition of "considered" pretty well. You consider it possible while not being sure if it's likely.
Compare to outright dismissal by trent.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/captain_sapphire_the_movie_gog_mafia_57/post434 "ZFR: His theory on Scene and blotunga is something I don't see being what's going on at all."
Out of the two reactions, I think the third scum more likely to react the way you did than the way trent did. [...]
I read your use of the term "considered" as you saying that I agreed with you at the time; sorry. Since we agree that I didn't - yes, I did explore your theory as I found your fixation interesting and odd, and wanted to understand why and how you thought things fit, while trying to discern what mind-set it all may be coming from. And yes, trentonlf reacted very differently, and he wasn't the only one to react differently, but is that really an indicator of anything regarding myself? trentonlf and I have vastly different play-styles as either alignment; the same applies to you, and everybody else, and me.
Regarding Korotan - yes, buddying-up wasn't the correct term to use, and I concur, what I said about Korotan, though my honest view of him and his play, isn't really AI.
ZFR: [...] SPF: if the fakeclaim was agreed upon at night, he would have asked a question that scene had the answer to [...] Anyway, even if the fakeclaim wasn't agreed upon at night, I'm not sure scum!SPF would immediately start questioning scene. [...]
I guess you're ruling out it might have been a subtle nudge that didn't click with supplementscene, or that it might have been clever distancing on SirPrimalform's part?
SirPrimalform: When I first started reading this I was thinking WTF, what list? And
then I get to the crucial bit of info and realise that you're referring to something that isn't even in the game thread. I confess, I saw that Joe was running another game and rushed to sign up without reading the sign up OP as I knew whatever Joe was doing I'd want to be in it.
Here's the forum thread I saw which referenced Psychoanalysts:
https://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1470584 [...]
[emphasis added]
*raises eyebrow*
I don't doubt that you wanted to be in whatever game JoeSapphire was modding, I am, however, questioning as what alignment you're in it.
The crucial bit of info in my post that should have caught your attention first isn't that the list was linked to in the sign-up OP, but that it was linked to in this very thread [emphasis added]:
HypersomniacLive: [...] The list of possible roles clearly says that it's an investigative role that finds out what modifiers (called qualifiers in that game) a player has.
The post with this list was linked to by Microfishd at the beginning of D2, and has been alluded and referred to a few times already. [...]
It's Microfishd's post #340 I'm referring to. So, even accepting that you didn't pay attention to the sign-up OP, I'm more than inclined to think that you selectively read the thread, as evidenced here with my very post;
missing that part of my post gives your explanation somewhat of a leg to stand on.
And looking at the link you gave, it's... interesting that when you saw Microfishd's flip, your first thought was to wander off this forum and spend time on a general search for info on the role instead of, or at least additionally to, going back and checking the game-thread which in turn would/should have led you to the sign-up thread (though it's not a prerequisite to know what the roles in play are).
PookaMustard: I had thought that SPF already checked that list and found nothing determinate, so I did the extra step and went to the mafia scum wiki to check it out and found nothing. If SPF didn't mention not finding anything, it's probable I would have checked the original roles list. [...]
So, you're saying that you took what SirPrimalform said as confirmation of him not only having checked the roles list but also having found nothing, so didn't check yourself, and just went with it. The same SirPrimaform who's exhibited like zero evidence he's actually caught up with and following the game-thread, and the same SirPrimalform you've had in your top suspects the whole game and were voting for on D3. D3 where you were very willing to vote supplementscene based on ZFR's catch, but didn't want to hammer him at the time so that we could get the most out of the situation before lynching him, and then did your part by... leaving right after making that post.
It's also interesting that you (sort of) addressed the other part of my post by replying to ZFR, and seeing that you base your vote on his arguments, it feels like you're trying to get on his good side now.
Vote PookaMustard Since deadline is tomorrow, I'll see if I can get on my neighbours wi-fi if my Internet connection problem isn't resolved.
*crossed fingers the post gets through without hiccups*