While I still think that a lot of what you wrote is just assumption over assumption which you simply pose as fact it amazes me how you constantly omit the actual gameplay part of the games you so despise ... but maybe that's just because you have no clue what you are describing here. How can you say that your argument is worth anything without even knowing what you are talking about? You said earlier "those games GOG are selling here" are those without actual gameplay. I have given up on Dreamcutter now after playing 8 hours because the game simply became quite difficult in level 4. So how can you DARE to claim the game has no gameplay and only exists for the porn part? Simple: because you don't even know the games you are talking about in the first place which makes your whole argumentation pretty much unproven and invalid. How could I review a game that I don't know? Just because of the game description? This would be extremely dumb, don't you think?

Here's some gameplay of Dreamcutter - I still doubt it will be able to turn on your brain but it's worth a try:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-BFwo92zuY

But you said something about a brick wall earlier ... so maybe it is impossible to make intolerant and hateful people see the truth by pointing out arguments that are proven. They only see what they want to see. So as I said in my first post: in your eyes I am sick, addiced to porn and ... because of all the brain rot ... not very intelligent at all. Something everybody who knows me would disagree, but who am I to destroy your dreamworld? ;)

Dreamcutter is a fun game with a pretty tasty art style. The other games from this studio... posted here... are rather inferior when it comes to the overall quality, from what i am able to see, i would not recommend.

Dreamcutter, yes... and the "naked" stuff is rather limited, i guess you have to be very prude in order to feel offended.

I would agree though every single one of them still has normal gameplay elements in it which our australian friend simply doesn't want to see. Fun fact: the slime girls one actually received negative comments on itch because people thought it would be too complex. I mean, it is a puzzle game after all :)

Okay, i am not so much into puzzle games and to me it is simply way to raw as a game... i rather enjoy "bigger games" in general. No issues with the graphic or adult content... though.

Naylas castle on the other hand, in my mind... inside the game, it just is way to raw and with overly one-sided elements not really able to feed the joy. It may need way more polish, it seems. At the current condition not able to satisfy my need for quality.

I did not play Dreamcutter yet, but the videos and infos i got is looking fine so far... maybe i may buy it at some point. Not the biggest game i guess, so the price is not to low. However, i already had nearly useless DLCs with the same price...

It is basically a metroidvania with jump and run elements, but i usually put it into the "2D action adventure-genre" (Sundered, Valfaris, Tower Hunter Erza... and so on). Although most of the other games with comparable genre are a bit more sophisticated, yet Dreamcutter got interesting elements and art.

Regarding NSFW content, simply content not trying to be "correct"... : This is a very individual thing i feel. To some individuals it may be damaging and to other individuals it is just content like everything else. However, there is no human without any "addiction"... if there is really none, we start to get depressed with sometimes deadly results. Some humans might be addicted to sexual matters... in many different shapes. Yet this is not automatically damaging if the mind and psyche is fine. It totally depends on the individual and how they are aproaching NSFW, mentally... psychologically. So this entire "moralization" of humans and the stuff they enjoy or feel some love or need for... is just plain useless and maybe even more damaging than the risks involved. I would say the sheer greed can be even more damaging, so a healthy human should still know a humble and upright attidude and never trying to be some "all knowing person" who actually still fails to see the "really big picture".

I would not call it "addiction" since "addiction" imo also implies that you are unable to live without it or stopping it which makes it a negative thing. I still fail to see how playing these games could affect anybody negatively - or more or less than playing regular games. As long as you know what's real and what's not where should be the harm? If people don't like to see explicit scenes at all they probably would not buy these games anyway and they have been informed which games might contain such scenes.

Well, i am addicted to food (i can not live without it... your term of making something bad)... sure i could stop it, with some questionable results.

Addiction means something way bigger to me, it can mean good or bad stuff... the term addiction is not good nor bad, it is without rating. I think, most humans can not truly live without sexuality, as this is a critical part to us and our survival. And some humans even may have a pretty big sex-drive and enjoy to see sexualized content. I feel no need for a rating; good or bad is dependable on "If it can be considered healthy to us", yet i do not dare to judge about the "healthy-matter" as... i am simply unable to judge at this point and toward a human unknown to me.

OK, again... i am addicted to food, your term of "being unable to live without". else the results may look questionable.
Addiction is something bigger than this, and it will affect any human at some point and toward something else. i do not even rate it because if i start to make some rating and trying to set the condition... i simply may come to the result that there is no clear way on how i could set a difference between good and bad... and to some humans even a high exposition with something else may not necessarily be damaging. Most of the humans are unable to live for a extended period without sex and sexual content (some humans may try telling you something different, yet it is mostly a lie°°), in our mind, body or in the form of certain medias, including art... so in this term almost every human is somewhat addicted to it. What makes the difference is most likely linked to a healthy amount or healthy exposition... but the exact amount can vary a lot dependable on the human. It is hard setting a clear line between healthy or not healthy... which usually would mean "the bad form of addiction". As long as i can not judge a certain human... i usually stay away from doing it and i try to avoid making the term "addiction" something bad, as there is not really good or bad with almost any term, only the exact shape may decide about good or bad, not the matter itself. I simply can not judge without sufficient knowledge so i stay away from judgement.

°°Humans in a social context, usually are trying to tell you the stuff which is of advantage to themself and/or their environment. At least "believed to be of advantage"... so it is a matter of their belief, even those having in mind "they got zero believes", i think everyone got some sort of believe... unless they are considered brain- or heart-dead. It is simply natural enjoying certain stuff and trying to have some kind of mental shape able to satisfy our needs and ideals in a social context. But anyway, no need making a big story here... fact is, we usually fail to see the bigger picture so i always recommend not to make any sort of excessive judgement... which clearly can be seen on a lot of the previous posts...

The border between "I like" and being addicted to is rather vague.
One might say that I am addicted to games in general, where I would disagree.

But let's just assume that we're really talking about addiction ... so what? Where's the difference if someone likes brutal gory games (or raunchy games) or is addicted to them?

As long as you don't play during work, no one will really care.
(and of course don't watch porn or movies in general during work).


We have here four new games, at least one of them being a decent platformer.
And they are bad because they have some naughty drawings? If someone thinks that is worse than having dozens of games with gory exploding enemies (or just turtles being stomped on for money), he really should rethink his view of the world.

you are so wrong mate

Agreed.

Removing Witcher 3 from Steam & GOG when?

Witcher 3 might have sex scenes, but that hardly makes it a porn game.

Most of the NSFW games on GOG don't even have sex scenes.

...What then, do they have a vivid game over text wall where they describe how Generic Goblin 30 sold you to a pharmacology collage?

Nah, some drawn pics with visible nipples, in many cases that's all.

Hunie Pop is a puzzle game that has a dating sim story, the success in the puzzles will decide how successful the player is during that date. But the furthest the girls go is to strip for the player, nothing more happens.

I'm of course not talking about ALL games, the VNs do contain some sex upon a certain extend. It's just a rough estimate, but I'd say that Being a DIK has less than 1% sexual content, usually there are hundreds of story pictures for each kinky scene. Definitly NSWF however.
The majority of each update is about story progress (except the last story episode of Lust Theory, that was one long orgy, but after that there are three 'good bye' story arcs without any lewd scenes).

Larry Laffer has sex during his adventures, that's basically his main goal of the game, he's obsessed with it. But he usually keeps failing until the very last moment. Also he sometimes has some events he tries to forget later (milking beavers), all behind closed doors. The only nudity in these games is to be found by finding a hidden picture or so. Gerald is a womanizer and sex machine compared to Larry. Still Larry games are listed as NSWF and those with Gerald are not.

House Party - until the exclusive content patch is installed - includes sex (after all it's a party with people trying to have some fun), but no uncensored nudity. The expansions don't contain sex at all, even with the patch installed. To reach a sex scene in the main game, one has to solve puzzles and complete quests - can also mess up and make everyone in the house hate him (or her, it can be played as female), without getting anything.
Uncensored it's rightfully listed as NSFW, but would calling it a porn game is a bit far fetched.

Wet/Lula - The sexy Empire. While the player actually manages a porn company (starting with one star only in some redneck town), but it is a financial/economy sim - and a difficult one too. As far as I recall there is no visible sex except some censored shoots where the view is blocked by the camera guy. All you see are some nipples and some guy's asses once in a while.

In Biing you manage a hospital and select your doctors by golf handicap and your nurses by bust size. No sex in here, it's just a business sim with some humor based on doctor clichés.


In many of the platformers or JRPGs you will find plenty of kinky stuff and sometimes also a sex scene, but most of the time it's just some raunchy poses, way less interaction than in the Witcher however.

The Kagura games are the ones most likely to deserve the 'porn game' title, but even that garbage is story based with only a small fraction of the time showing anythink kinky. And pixelated 320x240 bad animations are not for everyone anyway.

ps: Most VNs are released episodically before hitting GOG or steam, with supporters paying monthly fees. Because some of them DO pay because they want to see the kinky stuff, usually every release / episode has one kinky scene, but especially in the early episodes that more often than not does not include any sex, just some spying or shower scene. There is a reason for this. Some would leave until their favorite character got banged, so they try to pospone these events for the supporter's favorites as long as possible without losing them. But believe it or not, the most popular VNs actually have a elaborated story line. Where being a DIK is a light hearted collecege comedy like American Pie (with also some more serious story arcs), other games like Leap of Faith or Acting lessons deal with topics like depression. They do contain sex, yes. Like I said usually one or two scenes each episore. But they are very focused on the plot.
Not all are well written of course. The plot of Lust Academy is a disgrace, but at least it's fun at times.