It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Caesar.: For those who were asking what I meant about "proportioned means": from what I've read from non-nationalist-propaganda sources, the incidents have happened with protestors harassing and threatening the police while they were doing their job, not "people peacefully waiting to vote". If this is proven not to be the case, I will gladly take my words back.

Also: voting for independence is not a "human right". The propaganda has been repeating this for months, but it is not.

avatar
Lin545: They don't look like nationalists to me.. Nationalist is someone, who has country ideology literally above everything. Just voting or expressing preference to different flag, does not make one nationalist. But those who commit violence to "protect dignity of flag" - those are nationalists...
avatar
Caesar.: If you don't think those protestors are nationalists... then you don't know very much about Catalonia. (I don't mean it in a condescending way. I encourage you to research the situation if you're interested about it. This is a textbook example of a nationalist government trying to model a society after their ideology).
Why are riot police there to begin with, and why in bloody hell do you think that's appropriate? Because you hate separatists?


avatar
muntdefems: The rest of today and the next few days are gonna be really intense and interesting in Catalonia.

Going back right now to my home town to join the people there and try to prevent the ballot boxes from being removed. I hope not to be arrested. :P
Good luck!
Post edited October 01, 2017 by richlind33
avatar
Crosmando: No offense, but there isn't many examples in history where a a region has seceded from a country without the permission of the mother country, without some kind of fight taking place. I personally think the idea of secessionism is a downfall spiral because once you guarantee the universal right to self-determination, it means any tiny tribe or region can claim to be a nation, splintering nations into every smaller states like what happened to the former Yugoslavia.

Look at Africa, so many small countries which alone do not have the resources to support their own people, it's so ridiculous that they can't even think up new names for countries so you've got ridiculous situations like "Republic of Congo" and "Democratic Republic of the Congo", or "Niger" and "Nigeria" being two different countries, for God knows what reason. I mean if you can't even think up an original name for your country then you damn well don't deserve to be one.
The only legitimate way for a government to maintain national unity, IMO, is by serving the common interests first, rather than parasitical special interests that benefit at the expense of the majority.
Man.I am really against any secessions and break ups,but after all the BS Yugoslavia went through under the “Democracy” label,i somehow have a warm fuzzy feeling.Kosovo declared independence out of the blue,and when the Yugoslav police tried to intervene,Javier Solana and many others said it was a sign of police brutality and a humanitarian disaster in the making,while ignoring the fact that JewSA and EU paid Albanian war criminals to ethnicly wipe Kosovo of serbs,but that’s not important.And then we even got bombed in 1999 for just trying to protect the serbs that lived there since the 10th century.Democracy at its finest ;).Go Catalonia.My heart is with you.Cheers
Post edited October 01, 2017 by deja65
avatar
Caesar.: Also: voting for independence is not a "human right". The propaganda has been repeating this for months, but it is not.
avatar
T.Hodd: No, but freedom of expression is. I could start a poll on whether my county should be come it's own country, but no one would take it seriously and the government wouldn't care.
This is not a poll. The regional government has approved laws (ruled illegal by the Constututional Court) that say that it's a binding referendum with legal consequences. They have also told the population that they would automatically become a new country of the European Union. Lies and more lies.
avatar
richlind33: Why are riot police there to begin with, and why in bloody hell do you think that's appropriate? Because you hate separatists?
They are there because riots were to be expected. The nationalist propaganda has been talking for months about how the central government was going to respond with excessive violence. They expected more force and earlier. To be honest, I think they are disappointed the army has not been deployed (they talked about that a lot too).
Post edited October 01, 2017 by Caesar.
avatar
Caesar.: They are there because riots were to be expected. The nationalist propaganda has been talking for months about how the central government was going to respond with excessive violence. They expected more force and earlier. To be honest, I think they are disappointed the army has not been deployed (they talked about that a lot too).
Forget "nationalist propaganda" for the moment. Was the Spanish government really expecting riots, or is that just a convenient pretext for letting national police try to "beat some sense" into the "misguided" civilians? Or is "unlawful" voting now considered rioting?
Post edited October 01, 2017 by richlind33
I'm always rather sceptical of direct democracy when it comes to matters like this, as such single-issue referendums tend to be hijacked by the most emotionally involved parties, disregarded by the general populace and produce only a ill-informed result that is misinterpreted as the "will of the people". Direct democracy seldom ends up well - even seemingly innocuous subjects tend to be hijacked by extreme causes and end up in disaster.

All being said, I think the Scottish referendum was actually conducted in a surprisingly fairly civil and rational manner (the SNP notwithstanding), which is more than can be said about Brexit and this.

I personally have no political horse to back in the Catalan political debate. If it is the genuine and clear will of the Catalan people to be independent (i.e. at least a two thirds majority), then they should have it. But direct democracy should never be a mandate for the tyranny of the slight majority as it was for Brexit. Brexit has made the British look like loony racist idiots (and having been to the UK twice since the Brexit referendum, it's certainly that fraction of the population that control the media and public ear right now) and their reputation on the world stage has suffered as a result. If the Catalans choose to impose independence on the slightest of majorities, they too are going to find themselves with very little support from the international community.

That's not to say I approve of how the Spanish have gone about this. Rajoy's task should have been to mediate, compromise, debate. Instead he's desperately trying to enforce his political sensibilities as opposed to being a representative of his entire people. Solutions are seldom black & white, but Rajoy wants white and the Catalans want black. They see no shades of grey, and that's why they're in the shitstorm they are now. There should have been no concern about the mere holding of a referendum, as it wouldn't have been legally binding. I suspect Rajoy was just worried about the outcome going against him.

They're basically two shades of the same problem called nationalism, a phenomenon that should have died a painful death in 1945.
Post edited October 01, 2017 by _ChaosFox_
avatar
richlind33: Forget "nationalist propaganda" for the moment. Was the Spanish government really expecting riots, or is that just a convenient pretext for letting national police try to "beat some sense" into the "misguided" civilians? Or is "unlawful" voting now considered rioting?
Of course they were expecting riots. That "convenient pretext to beat some sense" was abandoned after the dictatorship and hopefully will never come back.
avatar
_ChaosFox_: I'm always rather sceptical of direct democracy when it comes to matters like this, as such single-issue referendums tend to be hijacked by the most emotionally involved parties, disregarded by the general populace and produce only a ill-informed result that is misinterpreted as the "will of the people". Direct democracy seldom ends up well - even seemingly innocuous subjects tend to be hijacked by extreme causes and end up in disaster.

All being said, I think the Scottish referendum was actually conducted in a surprisingly fairly civil and rational manner (the SNP notwithstanding), which is more than can be said about Brexit and this.

I personally have no political horse to back in the Catalan political debate. If it is the genuine and clear will of the Catalan people to be independent (i.e. at least a two thirds majority), then they should have it. But direct democracy should never be a mandate for the tyranny of the slight majority as it was for Brexit. Brexit has made the British look like loony racist idiots (and having been to the UK twice since the Brexit referendum, it's certainly that fraction of the population that control the media and public ear right now) and their reputation on the world stage has suffered as a result. If the Catalans choose to impose independence on the slightest of majorities, they too are going to find themselves with very little support from the international community.

That's not to say I approve of how the Spanish have gone about this. Rajoy's task should have been to mediate, compromise, debate. Instead he's desperately trying to enforce his political sensibilities as opposed to being a representative of his entire people. Solutions are seldom black & white, but Rajoy wants white and the Catalans want black. They see no shades of grey, and that's why they're in the shitstorm they are now. There should have been no concern about the mere holding of a referendum, as it wouldn't have been legally binding. I suspect Rajoy was just worried about the outcome going against him.

They're basically two shades of the same problem called nationalism, a phenomenon that should have died a painful death in 1945.
You are absolutely right except for one thing.People that truly love their country and stand by the borders described in the statute of their land are not nationalists.Many different nationalities can coexist with everybody having their rules,but they are not allowed to tincker(harm) with the stability and intergrity of a country without the consensus of all the people.And then we are back at square one and calling something racist and a dictatorship.Cheers
Post edited October 01, 2017 by deja65
avatar
Caesar.: Of course they were expecting riots. That "convenient pretext to beat some sense" was abandoned after the dictatorship and hopefully will never come back.
I wouldn't have expected riots, I'd have expected people trying to vote (Then again I'm not part of the Spanish police force so who knows what they were expecting).
No one tells you that the majority of Catalan people here are against independence. They stay at their homes, remain silent and watch their own business, while the minority who are for independence are aggressive and violent, out on the streets. Anyone outside of Catalonia and Spain might think that the majority of people wants the independence which is far from truth.

Even if they allowed them to vote (for the third time in 4 years), majority would still say no but the pro-independence people would still push it.
avatar
richlind33: Forget "nationalist propaganda" for the moment. Was the Spanish government really expecting riots, or is that just a convenient pretext for letting national police try to "beat some sense" into the "misguided" civilians? Or is "unlawful" voting now considered rioting?
avatar
Caesar.: Of course they were expecting riots. That "convenient pretext to beat some sense" was abandoned after the dictatorship and hopefully will never come back.
No, I think they were expecting voting, and believe that because it isn't "duly authorized" it constitutes "rioting". And I think Francisco Franco would very much approve. So if you really don't wish to return to darker times, you might want to open your eyes a little wider.
avatar
Caesar.: Of course they were expecting riots. That "convenient pretext to beat some sense" was abandoned after the dictatorship and hopefully will never come back.
avatar
T.Hodd: I wouldn't have expected riots, I'd have expected people trying to vote (Then again I'm not part of the Spanish police force so who knows what they were expecting).
So they thought beating up up the voters and confiscating the voting ballots would reduce the risk of riots? Surely this is only going to lead to more violence and extremism, especially towards the police forces. What a mess.
avatar
Caesar.: I will bite. The "referendum" has ben ruled illegal by every single court up to the Constitutional Court, but the regional government has decided to hold it anyway after repeated warnings from judges that it was illegal. So the police are doing their job, and according to the videos I've seen on TV (on different news channels), with the exact proportioned means you would expect in this situation.

That article tells only one side of the story: the side from the nationalistists' propaganda, which would make "1984" proud. They will call any kind of police intervention "excessive force against peaceful protestors". I would like to encourage everybody interested in these news to look for both sides, not just one.
avatar
Lin545: Well, I didn't read the article, but they all look pretty peaceful to me with hands up, of various age, unarmed, not physically strong, unmasked, not resisting... while being shot, beaten, rammed, dragged by hair, headstomped, thrown, kicked, pushed?

They don't look like nationalists to me.. Nationalist is someone, who has country ideology literally above everything. Just voting or expressing preference to different flag, does not make one nationalist. But those who commit violence to "protect dignity of flag" - those are nationalists...

Guess, if this is not excessive in your eyes, its because they are not using live ammunition?
I am totally against the violence that is occurring today in Catalonia, however days before the nationalist attacked the police while they were inside a building. They didn't let the police exit until another force of the police arrived to the building. Also, they stole the weapons that were in the cars and damaged the cars very badly. And today some groups of nationalist were throwing rocks and fences to the police (However the police today was too much violent and we are horrified and claiming our president should resign because his actions and his cowardice today are what, maybe not today, but sometime soon will be the reason why Catalonia is going to become independent).

I know some people that were against independence, but after the recent events, they are going to vote yes. And I can't blame them, I would do the same if I were them.
Post edited October 01, 2017 by Esmeralda95
avatar
T.Hodd: I wouldn't have expected riots, I'd have expected people trying to vote (Then again I'm not part of the Spanish police force so who knows what they were expecting).
avatar
CharlesGrey: So they thought beating up up the voters and confiscating the voting ballots would reduce the risk of riots? Surely this is only going to lead to more violence and extremism, especially towards the police forces. What a mess.
As some have suggested, it may be what the separatists were hoping for, to increase their support; if so, the Spanish government has taken the bait.
avatar
PainOfSalvation: ...aggressive and violent, out on the streets...
They don't seem aggressive or violent. None of the videos or images I have seen show any civilians being aggressive or violent - please link some to your post.