Posted March 31, 2015
I've been thinking, and here's where I am at the moment.
I've been on Ixam's case all day. I still find him incredibly suspect, mainly for his strange comments and refusal to share valuable information with us. However, I shall not vote for him today.
Since today seems to be an either-or sort of deal, I'm going to have to go ahead and say Vote: Sage103082. I just have way too many doubts in my mind to say that I believe her to be a pro-town neutral player. I think there's a real possibility that, should we reach the game's later stages, she would turn on us to win the match.
Furthermore, I can't quite fathom her abilities, as they seem quite OP. Usually JOAT characters, which she seems to be a variation on, have one-shot abilities. She has (to my memory) been correct before, but what is to stop her from saying,"Oh yeah, I watched X, and he/she visited Y last night. I say X is scum." at some point and getting a townie lynched if she decides to go side with scum.
I've been on Ixam's case all day. I still find him incredibly suspect, mainly for his strange comments and refusal to share valuable information with us. However, I shall not vote for him today.
Since today seems to be an either-or sort of deal, I'm going to have to go ahead and say Vote: Sage103082. I just have way too many doubts in my mind to say that I believe her to be a pro-town neutral player. I think there's a real possibility that, should we reach the game's later stages, she would turn on us to win the match.
Furthermore, I can't quite fathom her abilities, as they seem quite OP. Usually JOAT characters, which she seems to be a variation on, have one-shot abilities. She has (to my memory) been correct before, but what is to stop her from saying,"Oh yeah, I watched X, and he/she visited Y last night. I say X is scum." at some point and getting a townie lynched if she decides to go side with scum.