Posted April 24, 2017
Lifthrasil: @HSL: OK. You're right, details are important. So what detail didn't I answer yet? I think I answered everything about the page one interaction with Bookwyrm. And I think I explained my vote on Yogs. So what remains? I have still the same problem with your posts that I had in the last game. And that problem had nothing to do with me being scum in that game but was genuine: your posts are often so long that it is easy to overlook things. So, what is it that irks you and that I should answer?
HypersomniacLive: I'm sorry you feel overwhelmed, but if you can't read everything I post, then just look for your avatar to find the part(s) pertaining to you. Though if you can't be bothered to (carefully) read everything people post, my eyebrow will raise wondering why that may be... Irked? Do I necessarily, or exclusively, have to be irked by something you said in order to question you? I don't think so. Irked is a pretty strong term, imo, and if anyone was irked out of the two of us, it most certainly wasn't me.
You may think that you've answered everything you have been asked about, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you did; you didn't, not to mention that you just admitted to being prone to missing/overlooking things, at least in my posts. Or that you did answer them in a satisfactory to the other party way, hence the questioning may persist.
So, if you feel inclined enough, I asked you a question in my post #68:
Do you consider what yoglsoth did to fall into the same category as what Bookwyrm627 did?
Did/do you really expect yogsloth to make a wave using such phrasing?
HypersomniacLive: There, a not-all-that-long post, just and all for you. ;-)
I thought I had answered the first of those questions already. Well, formally what Bookwyrm did and what yogsloth did fall into the same category, soft-claiming, but it feels rather different. Bookwyrm's post was an ambigous post that can be read as a soft-claim or can also be read as pure banter. Bookwyrm has done that in the past as town. So it kind of fits. That doesn't mean he's town. But it is also not enough to condemn him, even if I don't like that way of playing.
Yogsloth, however, talked openly about nightkilling someone and announced several other kill intentions. And as I have already elaborated, while it is true that yogs is always a loose cannon, this one felt too much over the top for town-yogs. At least more over the top than I remember from town-yogs. My impression is, that as town yogs likes to call for blood and throw out a lot of silliness, but as scum he stirs up a lot more dust and makes outrageous claims, aiming for 'so much over the top that no one takes him serious any more'. And the later not-so-soft claim fits exactly into that theory. So there's your difference between those two and my reason to vote for yogs.
Second question: not exactly my phrasing of course. He would find some sillier phrasing. But something in the spirit of the examples I wrote, yes. I have witnessed yogs writing things like: "Lynch someone already! Anyone!" or "I want to kill you so much right now." or "If I had a dayvig-power, you'd be dead already." or even "Blood, blood, murder" (don't remember the exact phrasing). But an outright announcement "I am going to nightkill you" is new. That's not a call for blood, that's not a call for action to others. That's an announcement of intent and an implication of a night-killing role and I wouldn't have expected that from town-yogs.