Posted August 11, 2011
Last night or something, I don't know, I don't pay attention to timestamps, I got a message from some guy, claiming not to be Game Rager, or whoever the hell that is.
In my 1064 days here at GOG, I've done a lot, and I've done a little. I hope that I have made this experience for when I was paying attention to GOG that I may have entertained some of you.
But this guy, reaver-whatever started pming me. He said that some guys in the IRC told him to talk to me (Thanks guys, I thought we were friends).
Here's the extent of our conversation http://pastebin.com/x4RftYv0
I don't believe moderation is still necessary. I believe the use of the + and the - rep buttons are satisfactory enough to have a community that is self governing. GOG has long prided itself on the sophistication of it's users, although that may have changed since that little "we're closing" miscommunication (what can I say, they're polish, they aren't native English speakers, give 'em a break), either way I have not been an active member in the community since then (I couldn't stand the people bashing GOG, it was crazy one group of people would spend a million rep points on someone and then another would take it away), and I would not be a good judge of whether or not moderation is necessary.
I do believe that moderation was not ever necessary before that miscommunication, and I'd like to say I believe it is no longer necessary.
http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/why_are_asian_men_presumed_to_be_so_low_endowed
This thread, with a significant amount of low rated posts, says to me that the general userbase has a good idea of what is and what is not appropriate for the forums. I am proud of you guys.
Yes, it took 11 hours for the thread to be locked, but the offending user learned rather quickly that the community doesn't like it. Just having a moderator close it, or just having someone 'with power' opposing the one person, doesn't really help to educate the offending user why it's wrong, but only encourages more opposition.
Having moderators would certainly change the air about this place as well.
If the community agrees to discuss a subject, there's no reason they shouldn't be allowed to, and having a self-governing community without mods allows for this. Instituting 'law-enforcing peons' who stay strict to the rules and get power rushes does not allow as much for a friendly community, that can discuss a wide range of topics with such sophistication.
GOG has always felt that moderation is unnecessary, sometimes things do need to be closed, but for the most part the community is fine.
I was here when the first thread got closed, and there was no doubt then, it needed to be closed, but GOG was in favor of a community based moderation then, and still is to this day.
tl;dr qq for mods, n00bs.
(EDIT: I'll use as many commas as I damn well please! MUAHAHAHAH!!!)
In my 1064 days here at GOG, I've done a lot, and I've done a little. I hope that I have made this experience for when I was paying attention to GOG that I may have entertained some of you.
But this guy, reaver-whatever started pming me. He said that some guys in the IRC told him to talk to me (Thanks guys, I thought we were friends).
Here's the extent of our conversation http://pastebin.com/x4RftYv0
I don't believe moderation is still necessary. I believe the use of the + and the - rep buttons are satisfactory enough to have a community that is self governing. GOG has long prided itself on the sophistication of it's users, although that may have changed since that little "we're closing" miscommunication (what can I say, they're polish, they aren't native English speakers, give 'em a break), either way I have not been an active member in the community since then (I couldn't stand the people bashing GOG, it was crazy one group of people would spend a million rep points on someone and then another would take it away), and I would not be a good judge of whether or not moderation is necessary.
I do believe that moderation was not ever necessary before that miscommunication, and I'd like to say I believe it is no longer necessary.
http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/why_are_asian_men_presumed_to_be_so_low_endowed
This thread, with a significant amount of low rated posts, says to me that the general userbase has a good idea of what is and what is not appropriate for the forums. I am proud of you guys.
Yes, it took 11 hours for the thread to be locked, but the offending user learned rather quickly that the community doesn't like it. Just having a moderator close it, or just having someone 'with power' opposing the one person, doesn't really help to educate the offending user why it's wrong, but only encourages more opposition.
Having moderators would certainly change the air about this place as well.
If the community agrees to discuss a subject, there's no reason they shouldn't be allowed to, and having a self-governing community without mods allows for this. Instituting 'law-enforcing peons' who stay strict to the rules and get power rushes does not allow as much for a friendly community, that can discuss a wide range of topics with such sophistication.
GOG has always felt that moderation is unnecessary, sometimes things do need to be closed, but for the most part the community is fine.
I was here when the first thread got closed, and there was no doubt then, it needed to be closed, but GOG was in favor of a community based moderation then, and still is to this day.
tl;dr qq for mods, n00bs.
(EDIT: I'll use as many commas as I damn well please! MUAHAHAHAH!!!)
Post edited August 11, 2011 by Weclock
This question / problem has been solved by Gundato