Anyone want to point out why this post is scummy? ;)

Pazzer's targeting of Robbeasy is pretty weird considering he's been posting much more than me...

It's the repeated mentions of third-parties that pings my scumdar.

I suppose that's weird too. Maybe he has a weird win condition or a post restriction of some kind?

Yep, I agree with you. Using 3rd party excuse for lynch is scumtell. But it is partially understandable why he mentions Thiev as 3rd party this time as his/her words can be read such way.

Pardon my presumptuousness, but I suspect you meant Andy433uk's targeting of Robbeasy, as opposed to Pazzer's, given you mentioned the numbers of posts (and that Pazzer's primary target isn't Robbeasy at the moment).

Yes.
There are three possible explanations to this. Bad wording, 3rd party trying to convince town or inexperienced mafia slipping.
I am inclined to 3rd party too.
(S)he provided "explanation" but it's quite strange.
Saying it's not joking statement and therefore it seems quite un-townish.

Whoops, yes! Sorry Pazzer! I was suspicious of Andy and then got distracted by Pazzer's 3rd party obsession and attributed Andy's weirdness to Pazzer as well.

Sums up why my vote isnt shifting till thiev provides me with something to change my opinion

Yeah, as I mentioned Thiev's comment was very oddly worded.

Pazzer's very quick Vote on Thiev was very oddly timed, especially when he's claiming he gave out reasons for voting for Thiev in another post. Well, yes, he did, along with reasons to vote for EVERYONE ELSE BUT VITEK! What makes Thiev stand out more then the rest of us?

I think the stuff about nmillar's playstyle has muddied the waters more then anything else, and I'm starting to think it's a Mafia ploy at this stage of the game. It's a distraction that really doesn't get us going anywhere.

unvote, Vote Pazzer

I agree with you guys, Pazzer's vote for Thiev definitely feels scummy, and so does his third party hunt. More importantly, though, we are running out of time (with a weekend ahead of us, no less), and this is a wagon I am willing to support.

unvote
vote Pazzer

When's the actual deadline again? I share the same suspicions about Pazzer as most and wouldn't object to voting for him if time was running out. Also, how many votes does he already have?

My vote is the fourth, putting him at L-4, unless I've made a mistake in my notes (not impossible). The deadline should be July 3, 7PM EDT, which is around Sunday midnight in Europe, I believe.

OK - after my nmillar aruments were effectively killed stone dead by the Rod / nmillar row, I decided to sit back a bit and let other people speak for a while, see what comes up.

Thiev - I agree entirely that the wording he(she) used was very odd - however I'm more inclined to see it as inexperience more than anything else, don't forget this is his/hers first game. As for 3rd Party speculation, again I think thats pretty pointless on Day1 and only serves to further muddy waters.

Pazzer - usual Pazzer style, short but sweet posts, but whats this? Post 284 a big long read of everyone, thats not the usual Pazzer at all - although seeing everyone as Mafia unless proven otherwise is a wise way to go..;o) Then theres 429, speculating on 3rd Party . The speculation is on Thiev, and to be fair Pazzer is not the only one who has suggested there might be 3rd Party there - mainly because of Thiev's odd wording. To sum up, for me thats a pretty shaky bandwagon you've got going there, I'll have no part of it.

nmillar is still for me numero uno suspect - I notice he started this late 'its getting late lets lynch someone quick ' bandwagon (post 436 kicks it off) , and handily had an earlier vote already on Pazzer - left on from RVS, with no greater reason than Pazzer was lurking at the time (post 282).

I know it looks like I'm proper gunning for nmillar, but I just cant see his play so far as anything remotely town-like! Am I the only one here? Vote stays on him .