It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
JMich: Remind me, why is that?
No.
avatar
amok: aye, for confirmation purposes it would be better to lynch Telika or RW.

I will wait until we get a vote count to revisit my own vote
In a way I agree with you - but won't we get "confirmation" on one or both of them tonight? Why in the world would scum continue to let townies who know townies live? And again while I've gone back and forth on Telika more times than I can count, and while I WOULD like to maybe vote him I can't stomach the idea of lynching one seer and having the other get killed tonight (assuming both are seers or know who other townies are "by other means")
C'mon, A_Future_Pilot go with my proposed quick topic plan. It will be epic.
avatar
flubbucket: C'mon, A_Future_Pilot go with my proposed quick topic plan. It will be epic.
Scummy! Vote Flu...

Kidding - do tell do tell! ;)
avatar
amok: aye, for confirmation purposes it would be better to lynch Telika or RW.

I will wait until we get a vote count to revisit my own vote
avatar
Ixamyakxim: Why in the world would scum continue to let townies who know townies live?
For just that reason. Why would he do such a thing? Therefore he is not scum, and he can live long life on that... hmmm?

Specially considering that there are so many targets to choose from at this point in time.

How I see it - Lynching SPF do not confirm Telika or RW as town or scum. Lynching Telika indicates SPF's alignment, but not RW's. Lynching RW indicate Telika and SPF's alignments. However, if RW is scum, it can still do not mean that Telika and SPF is town or scum, but RW tried to give himself an alibi on the back of someone else, or RW and Telika is scum, but SPF is town and they worked together creating impression of being town on the back of SPF (if he is indeed town....). For now, the only one which is kind of townie for me is Telika, as he stopped SPF's lynch. But that may be just be what he wants us to think. I am getting confused now...

Creating a situation of a no-lynch again is also a small win for scum, which Telika in an effect have done unless we agree on another victim in 1 day.

Dearest moderator - we need that vote count

I
Am still okay with the

vote Ixamyakxim

because I suspect Flub and feel some scumbuddying waves there since the start of the game.

But I would have liked an answer by Ix to my question :

Do you have already played mafia forum games, or such games ?
avatar
Telika: Do you have already played mafia forum games, or such games ?
I've never played in anything quite like this one! (varied unknowns, many mechanics at play) but I have played a forum game or two. Why do you ask?

And you guys can't lynch me - there will only be like 3 people left to vote if you lynch me! ;)
Sadly, he does sorta have a point. If we lynch an active person, it will just be that much harder to get a majority next time. But, if Ixam is the only person we can agree upon, you'll have my vote before deadline because we cannot possibly win if we never lynch anyone (unless the scum start night-killing their own). Just like Flub and SirPrimalForm (and not saying the reasoning wasn't there), all sure got a number of votes piled upon them at the end without hesitation. With so few of us really active, makes me wonder if all three choices gained traction only because they were acceptable to scum as well...

Personally, I still have a bad feeling about Cmdr/P1na. I did not like the looks of the Cmdr's actions day 1 where it appeared to me, at least, that the purpose was more to sow confusion. Add that this might be the same person who seemingly had too much fun in his group chat (although as a different player) and is now pretty much nowhere to be found. Add these three things together, we'd be lynching a suspect player who through his absence has been hurting our chances of getting a proper lynch.
I doubt this will end in anything else than no-lynch again. But no, there is no point in lynching absent player. We won't learn anything from poeple voting him as it is easy lynch to hide behind and those players will hopefully be gone anyway soon. So no point in lynching them.
Ix would get my vote, if he didn't have it already, for jumping back in day before deadline after he was lurking all Day and trying to once again cast doubts on Telika, RWarehall and SPF.
There is a difference between voting for an absent person who has never posted (or posted very little) and a recently inactive person who has a sizable post history and suspect behavior. I'm not sure how you can say "We won't learn anything". That's a blanket statement. Are you subtly trying to keep people from voting P1na, Vitek?
avatar
Ixamyakxim: Why do you ask?
For something about the way you play. Dare I ask about the kind of forum games you've played ?
Well, my vote against Vitek with zero rationale behind it gained almost zero attention. The only person to actually challenge me on it was JMich. Fair enough.

Back to how I started the Day:

Vote: Ixamyakxim
Why would I? I hope PIna will be removed from this game, together with at least nmillar and SPF (I would also add Ix because he was gone for 15 days but apparently he is posting again - I expected to be it more than 4 players but in recent days every other player posted at least once although a lot of them were quiet for around week at some point (I am not without guilt either)). I already mentioned more than week ago that he hasn't posted in weeks and he should be dealt with.

I said it clearly in my post. We will learn nothing becuase they will hopefully die anyway (by mean of modkill) and lynch of absent player only to remove him from games won't show anything about players voting him.
Well, I forgot to unvote:

Unvote: Vitek
Vote: Ixamyakxim

And since I am going to have to fill the 10 minute waiting period somehow, I might as well give my opinion on voting for inactives. I don't like it. It gains little information, since they have been inactive. Furthermore, even if they turn out to be scum, it wouldn't have mattered much; there is no data to point to other scumbuddies, and they weren't actively being scum anyway! Sure, eventually all scum, even the inactives, need to be dealt with, but might as well save the useless ones for last.

Pre-post edit:

Thanks for the bump post, Vitek, even if it wasn't intended as that. :)
Well, guess no reason to wait for the deadline. Appears there is one candidate and one candidate only and no other people will gather any discussion. I am a little worried about the ease of lynching Ixam (providing me doubts we have an actual scum), but I cannot disagree there is a certain scummy vibe to his posts. We definitely lose if we never agree to any lynch. I just hope my doubts are wrong, we really could use a scum kill at this point.

Unvote
Vote: Ixamyakxim