It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
I remember official downloader from when gog was still very new, and I never understood it's value. I'd have to go to GOG website, click each individual game to queue it in downloader. As opposed to having to go to GOG website, and just download the file through browser... Maybe good to download game you are about to play, but absolutely inadequate to backup your collection (at least once you get to 100+ titles). I don't think it will be missed THAT much, as long as standalone installers are maintained.

I've grown lazy to a point that I don't even download installers anymore. Well, lazy and I'd have to buy bigger disk before doing that - my last backup is something like 3 or 4 years old, and that was using lgogdownloader (which I think is already ported to using galaxy API).
high rated
Very sad (and pissed off) to hear this announcement but knew the writing was on the wall. I will miss GOG Downloader as it offered an easy and bloat free way of downloading offline installers with just one click.

I don't understand why it's being retired as it's not been updated for years but still works perfectly. Guess it's GOG's way to push users to Galaxy :(
I'll miss the little guy

I hope this won't get in the way of me downloading games without gog galaxy?
Tbh I haven't used the Downloader in years now... mostly gogrepy.py or Galaxy for single games. So no great loss for me.
F
The only surprise is how long it took. That and maybe getting the announcement before the links stopped working.
Post edited March 10, 2020 by Grargar
high rated
I (and others) REFUSE to use the "optional" Galaxy, so it's a bummer that one of the two non-Galaxy options was removed. I don't understand the explanation at all. What specifically changed now as opposed to 6 years ago? To the user, clearly Downloader was working generally fine and not hurting anything.

I can't help but feel this is designed to drive more people towards the "optional" Galaxy's conveeeeenience, since the browser downloads do not offer the one-click style that the Downloader did. Regardless, I will be sticking with my browser downloads no matter how many clicks it takes.

Downloader put Galaxy to shame as a "DRM-free delivery system".
Goodbye downloader!
low rated
avatar
rjbuffchix: I (and others) REFUSE to use the "optional" Galaxy, so it's a bummer that one of the two non-Galaxy options was removed. I don't understand the explanation at all. What specifically changed now as opposed to 6 years ago? To the user, clearly Downloader was working generally fine and not hurting anything.

I can't help but feel this is designed to drive more people towards the "optional" Galaxy's conveeeeenience, since the browser downloads do not offer the one-click style that the Downloader did. Regardless, I will be sticking with my browser downloads no matter how many clicks it takes.

Downloader put Galaxy to shame as a "DRM-free delivery system".
Umm.. I can only take myy educated guess, so take it as you want but... Keeping a six year old piece of software running means you need to upkeep six year old APIs, in worst case scenarios it can mean you are totally cut off from updates or improvements to the system, since you need to maintain the old download system, or are unable to switch server systems. It's not always that easy to carry a huge backpack of software functions that blow up your source code and keep you form switching.

As long as the website offers the installer downloads I am fine. There is software to collect those links, to get all at once, but on the other hand clicking four times wont hurt.
Personally I don't care about losing GOG Downloader as I never used it, but I do care that this is setting a diabolical precedent.

Like for example, how GOG is probably going to do the same thing to pre-2.0 versions of GOG Galaxy, even though the Galaxy 2.0 interface is absolutely terrible and radically different from the great interface in earlier versions.

It's going be a very bad thing if/when GOG forces everyone either to use Galaxy 2.0 (or later versions than 2.0) or no Galaxy at all.
low rated
Good riddance.

I'm surprised GOG kept that totally obsolete client alive this far, it just doesn't make any logical sense that GOG would have used resources keeping it up, when there are so much better ways to download one's games from GOG.

For now I use gogrepo.py and occasionally my web browser to download my games, they serve their purposes much better. On top of them, I have hard time understanding why I would want to use the old Downloader anymore.
R.I.P.
low rated
avatar
fronzelneekburm: Because, as we all know, having two methods of downloading games is way better than having three methods! Having three methods only serves to confuse people.

This will no doubt go over well with the community!
GOG Downloader is not "another method". It is just one more additional client to download the offline installers, on top of Galaxy, web browsers and the existing third-party tools (like gogrepo.py and lgogdownloader).

People who cry they want to download their games "without clients"... GOG Downloader is not the solution because it is a client, after all. The existence of the GOG Downloader has nothing to do with "freedom of choice". It doesn't serve any real purpose anymore, obsolete is obsolete.
low rated
thus far, less wailing and gnashing of teeth than I expected.

Fine by me. I would be interested in the business decision behind this though; like was Support getting too many complaints about people confused about what those Downloader links were?
low rated
avatar
tfishell: thus far, less wailing and gnashing of teeth than I expected.

Fine by me. I would be interested in the business decision behind this though; like was Support getting too many complaints about people confused about what those Downloader links were?
In the software development industry, it is quite normal to drop support for old and obsolete products. That is why Microsoft is not supporting Windows 95, XP, Vista or 7 anymore. It has nothing to do whether MS would still be receiving too many support calls or whatever from their users, they are simply obsolete now and replaced with newer products.

Since Galaxy also offers the ability to download the offline installers AND one can also use web browsers for that, there simply is no reason to keep the old Downloader up anymore.