Posted June 27, 2025
A fun additional Even If: Were the SKG Initiative to actually keep momentum and pass the number needed to be discussed, the wheels of bureaucracy are not easily greased, and you can bet your bippies that there are many parties and "vested people" who would see to it that the process is made as painfully slow as possible.
With the whole "I WANT IT NOW" energy the initiative exudes, I can imagine it to be a slow torture watching a group of 100+ uncaring people discuss this while being influenced from all sides, even without being picked apart. 5 years, soonest? Maybe 10? Would anyone still care by then?
For Example: Is it really in the interest of the German Games Industry Association group who openly fund video game projects to have them live forever? I could see an argument where they would eventually want to terminate funding for projects because they've stretched on long enough. (Especially if said project is an embarrassment such as a failed multiplayer game or the Amico.)
With the whole "I WANT IT NOW" energy the initiative exudes, I can imagine it to be a slow torture watching a group of 100+ uncaring people discuss this while being influenced from all sides, even without being picked apart. 5 years, soonest? Maybe 10? Would anyone still care by then?
For Example: Is it really in the interest of the German Games Industry Association group who openly fund video game projects to have them live forever? I could see an argument where they would eventually want to terminate funding for projects because they've stretched on long enough. (Especially if said project is an embarrassment such as a failed multiplayer game or the Amico.)
Post edited June 27, 2025 by dnovraD