vanchann: In general, the easiest way without breaking the system is to download libjson. Extract its contents (DON'T INSTALL) and then copy the missing file to the lib folder inside the game's folder.

k0st1x: ubuntu 16.10
there is error when running PSTEE
[i]$ ./start.sh
Running Planescape: Torment Enhanced Edition
./Torment: error while loading shared libraries: libjson.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory[/i]
any other dnd game run without issue (iwdee, bgee)
is there any idea - what file is missing?

V4V:

Lucumo: Congrats to Neverwinter Nights Diamond on becoming the number 1 bestselling title on GoG.

Projectsonic: Hey, I'll take it.

If nothing else it equals more modules.

dudalb: This thread is just more proof that Gamers are not happy unless they have something to bitch about.

227: Someone who just found out about GOG and signed up today or on any day after today?

Djaron: i find it a dangerous argument... i mean, your "oh, the old version was on the store for long enough time now, peeps interested in the old version should already have bought it by now"

games are like music, or movies and such... sometimes some peeps manage to share their passion and have younger audience or previously clueless audience discovering what they liked themselves
it happens everyday.
Some people may have liked the neverwinter mmo and may had no clue about games that were released 20 yers ago... Then some of their older relative, or friend, or big brother/sister would tell them that there were older games at the roots of what they are liking now.
And thanx to gog, those games (the old ones) are playable on modern machines, making it easy and less painful for non tech-savy peeps to enjoy them even now. Some of those games are completely enjoyable even now, despite of graphics or maybe with applying a little resolution fix/mod

with digital distribution, such "passing on the legacy" of cultural products may dissapear, no more "rumaging through grandpa/old uncle's stash in the attic" anymore. And it's bad. If you replace/obfuscate every old classic with new sort of remakes/remasters.
IT's like i would make a 2017 remake of some classics like bridge of kwai river or gone with the wind, or a dubstep redux of mozart's work and say: ok, lets bury the old versions, they are not interesting anymore as we have the new thing now, everyone who were interested before should already have them.

No, this is a dangerous argument One have to give peeps th choice, and also the means to compare. and yes, i know the old edition is bundled with the EE one, but purchasing the new one, with a higher price tag is mandatory, hence biasing any comparison or assessement by putting it behind a paywall and nullifying the need or point in comparing No need checking if old version is nice enough for you, as you were forced to buy both at once...
Djaron: the credit tune was one of my 3 top favorite in the game :(

Zkuq: Beamdog sucks. I don't mind new version of old games, even at a higher price. What I do mind is taking away the option to buy the original editions at a cheaper price. The only reason for this can be greed, combined with the knowledge that relatively few people would actually opt to buy the newer, more expensive version when a much cheaper version is also available. Shame on you, Beamdog! You're even worse than Ubisoft, EA, and the likes, in my eyes.

Stormwalker: Says the guy who can't help but bitch about a thread he doesn't like. No one is forcing you to look at this thread, bro. These people have a right to their opinions, same as you.

And how exactly SHOULD a gamer behave? Are gamers just supposed to accept whatever developers throw at them even if it leaves a bad taste in their mouths? I for one think that consumer preferences and attitudes should drive companies, not the other way around. We're the ones paying money.

throgh: The problem stays: Here is a clear direction to be seen. Direct criticism towards Beamdog is upvoted while even just helping comments like the one from vanchann are downvoted, without any reason or further discussion. Taking this into account: The complete thread is based upon enforcement of a single opinion. You can call this also some kind of "shitstorm", which is reflected within the rating for the game. And last but not least: Some people here just want to have their opinion being the right one or better the important one by linking their GOG-mix as proof of concept. Yes it is a proof of concept, indeed: That hating something seems to be more important than helping for example. And ignorance is also part of this: The newer version is running on more platforms than Windows wthout having any wrapper installed. There were even possibilities in the past having the same, only a minority reacted. Now a company had done this job and because they have done something in the past pure hatred is going up. And other opinions are downvoted or ignored. Yes, as I've said: Indeed proof of concept. We have to learn much now and in the future. But it is also a typical behaviour these days, especially when having such a nonsense tool like rating for comments in a forum.

p1881: Where is there an enforcement of a single opinion? Do you feel pressured when people mostly react negatively to this enhanced edition when you enjoy it yourself?

Kardwill: Myself, I don't really care, I already have the original and it works on my current machine. But the mood on these forums has become toxic and unfriendly as hell, man. Either you howl with the rest of the pack, or you get squashed :/