It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
TARFU: This sounds like a movie villain monologue. "Now Mr. Bond, prepare to meet my sharks with frickin laser beams that will destroy your pesky brand of consumerism!!!mwahahaha!!!1!!one"
avatar
richlind33: This is what you sound like...
That's a very compelling and thought-provoking post. I'll now have to reconsider every stance I've developed. Quite an existential crisis you've caused. What a predicament, average white cat.
avatar
GameRager: Sadly this is so....it reminds me of BUY-N-LARGE from Wall-e.
avatar
TARFU: That movie had to have been the most hypocritical piece of trash I've ever seen. When it came out, in the stores around here we had Wall-E toothbrushes, stuffed toys, games, stickers, t-shirts, etc. You name it. Ironic bit of hypocrisy that a movie that demonized consumerism made the producers filthy rich off of producing landfills worth of cheap, movie-branded consumer junk.
It was still cute and had a good message...if nothing else I would like some to take that much away from watching it.
avatar
TARFU: That movie had to have been the most hypocritical piece of trash I've ever seen. When it came out, in the stores around here we had Wall-E toothbrushes, stuffed toys, games, stickers, t-shirts, etc. You name it. Ironic bit of hypocrisy that a movie that demonized consumerism made the producers filthy rich off of producing landfills worth of cheap, movie-branded consumer junk.
avatar
GameRager: It was still cute and had a good message...if nothing else I would like some to take that much away from watching it.
I suppose I can agree with you there.
avatar
GameRager: It was still cute and had a good message...if nothing else I would like some to take that much away from watching it.
avatar
TARFU: I suppose I can agree with you there.
W/regards to being hypocritical: The Lorax also was VERY guilty of this...especially considering the message of the film/short.
avatar
TARFU: I suppose I can agree with you there.
avatar
GameRager: W/regards to being hypocritical: The Lorax also was VERY guilty of this...especially considering the message of the film/short.
Another similar example there, I agree.
avatar
GameRager: W/regards to being hypocritical: The Lorax also was VERY guilty of this...especially considering the message of the film/short.
avatar
TARFU: Another similar example there, I agree.
Yeah all the adverts were like "save the planet/humanity but here....buy this suv and these other lorax branded products and pollute all you want because it somehow helps the environment I guess *shrug*?"
avatar
kbnrylaec: A non-gamer claimed that "most games are trash" on the forum, but expressed exactly nothing about why he/she think that.

Facts:
1. Gaming addiction classified as disorder by WHO
2. Global games market value rising to $134.9 billion in 2018. You know, the first video game appeared around 1958. It is zero to $134.9 billion in merely 60 years.
3. mobygames.com already registered 200,000 games. It is 3333 games per year, or 9 games per day since 1958.
4. As of July 2018, a third of people on this planet are gamers.

Any one who have a clear mind know video games are fun.

UPDATE
Fix typo
What are you doing here with your facts and varifyable data. This is no place for such nonsense :P!

Truth be told you have to be very cynical and/or biased to think that most games are garbage, realistically. Even most low rated games are actually not really "that" bad. What is a 4/10 game would've easily been a 7/10 or higher only 12 years or so ago. There are people out there who think the direct opposite and have way stronger opinions than me however.

It has been a while since I've played a truely bad game that doesn't even feel like one. I feel that even the more simple games do alright things nowadays. I don't really think that shovelware exists in a way it did 20 years ago thanks to the indie boom and cheap games (lots of "shovelware" is actually pretty cheap and fun to play with for a day or two).

Facts are, the industry is large enough so even smaller devs can make their fair share of money regardless of the 9 games per day being released with lots of competition. It gives good perspective how diverse the video game industry really is.

EDIT: Reading through this thread two times its really weird that people feel compelled to defend games and gaming, I thought this was a positivity thread at first. The WHO simply talking about people who actually risk danger from playing way too much. Its simply acknowledging the outright extreme gaming can do to you, its also more tame since its far less physical than lets say alcohol consumption. As with gaming, there are far less physical "links" that can change your metabolism to make you addicted to games through mental stimulation (this happens obviously, its just takes much longer and you really have to play video games very frequently). Even then there is a big chance that it doesn't really manifest as a full addiction like many physical drugs do.

Statistically, even if you game around 6-10 hours a day (if you have a job) you're far more at danger getting hit by a car while getting groceries than getting addicted, which isn't exactly of high probability either.
Post edited May 30, 2019 by Dray2k
avatar
richlind33: This is what you sound like...
avatar
TARFU: That's a very compelling and thought-provoking post. I'll now have to reconsider every stance I've developed. Quite an existential crisis you've caused. What a predicament, average white cat.
As opposed to the post it was in response to? lol

BTW, is that self-deprecation, or is your Freudian slip showing? o.O

Alzheimers???
Post edited May 29, 2019 by richlind33