It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
NO-LYNCH is at L-1

(that is, if L-1 exists)

perhaps I should say:

47% of the villagers think not killing anyone is the best idea
Post edited September 09, 2016 by drealmer7
gone for several hours
For interest's sake, I've been watching Marie very closely. She seems suspiciously unattracted to my beard.

avatar
Brasas: Hmmm... do you imply he and you both know something the rest of us don't know?
avatar
bler144: @Stan, still, I would also appreciate an answer to that, whether or not Brasas was serious.
The first time he's contributed something... Except that something is just parroting Dan's question.

And then he reads Craig as Town, and someone named "HSL" who doesn't even live here.

avatar
bler144: Hiya Trent - how do you feel about all the PM chatter this game?
Second contribution. Useful?

avatar
bler144: (...)
How's that beard-eating going? Or the thinking. Either one.
(...)
How's your ax looking now? Where would you propose we start the hunt?
(...)
Any other thoughts on setup, or are you pretty locked in on this one? And were you thinking 4 cultists in that mix, or more of a 5/5/5/1/1?
(...)
OK, I'm not one to talk, but here's his third contribution. More questions. Still no real input.

avatar
bler144: are you advocating No-lynch here?
I feel like I'm being stupid.

avatar
bler144: (...)
avatar
bler144: (...)
Contributory! All about yogsloth. Fun.

avatar
bler144: His post about the trombone probably felt the most off to me. He didn't bring a show of force, he didn't counter, he didn't try and townie his way out of it, just made a personal barb and clammed up.
Huh. I need to look into these "trombones".


I'll be back with more.
Bump for the bearded man.
I wrote a very nice verbose post and then deleted it by accident >__>

Wyrm: no, and fair.
avatar
drealmer7: October 9, 1696 -

The first week and a half after Julie's death are filled with grief, fear, confusion, and a great deal of adjustment to the dwindled number of villagers left in Oakwood. None of you know exactly what to do other than try and work together as a community the best you can and figure out what the best course of action is to take.

The group of you is very used to working together and everything is well-organized and there are no logistical issues with the lot of you being around for the pertinent parts of whatever discussions are going on. You are all able to get your basic and necessary chores and work done around the village and your homes (again, as much as you can with your dwindled numbers.) You are working together and doing your best to keep the village running as best you can, and that is pretty damn good, actually. Everyone is able to eat regular meals and you all get what sleep you can in these anxious times. There really is at least some semblance of normalcy, despite it all.

You all spend a good portion of every day at The Community Home, and it has been a center of activity among you. At least one meal is prepared and cooked there for the group each day. It varies each time who works together making what, and it's a nice affirmation of your dedication to working together.

Pancakes, bacon, eggs, and breakfast potatoes (cut-up potatoes, peppers, onions, and garlic fried in a cast-iron skillet, crispy and yummy!) are a favorite and are had regularly, and in general a good deal of edibles are kept around for those that want something to eat during the long hours of discussion that tend to happen and there is never a shortage of available food.

Often when preparing your own food at your own homes, depending on what you make, you will make an excess and bring the leftovers to The Community Home to share with the rest of the remaining villagers.

All of you still have plenty of time, energy, focus, and opportunity to get together and discuss the situation at hand as much as you can. You reflect on things, talk things out, and really feel like you are all working towards figuring out what course of action to take.

There are some who think it is possible that the attack on Julie was just an isolated event and that perhaps everything is fine and safe and perhaps the exodus of the main portion of the villagers was pre-mature, and then there are some of you who think there is a serious threat at hand, just waiting for the right moment to strike.

Everyone is well-adjusted to the flow and you are currently all at The Community Home working on the situation at hand.

More than half of you, whether with much conviction or not, have conceded that the discussion that needs to be being had is whether or not to kill one of you.
Well THAT was a bit of a logical swerve.

Will catch up in a bit.
avatar
Brasas: And he singles you rather than the numerous other lurkers? He must have the hots for you Justin. I'm so jealous.
avatar
Stanari: More...active lurking, I suppose? Here but not outputting sufficient content? (Is there anyone in this game who meets that standard, save Nacho?)
Pretty much!

avatar
Brasas: The master coaster is usually Yogs himself of course... in that sense takes one to know one maybe.
BWA WA WA WA WHAT?!??

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Werewolves or whatever hitting the town only once a month? Meh. We might be able to reproduce faster than that.
Lol

avatar
drealmer7: Though, Marie wouldn't be opposed to some practice if any of the strapping hunks here care to oblige her, she even thinks Emma might have what it takes to tickle her fancy.
Great googily moogily.

avatar
drealmer7: NO-LYNCH is at L-1

(that is, if L-1 exists)

perhaps I should say:

47% of the villagers think not killing anyone is the best idea
Wait wait wait wait.

Nobody move.

Nobody unvote.

Nobody breathe.
So if anybody unvotes or votes no-lynch, Day ends with no-lynch.

I would suggest a couple more people cast votes for somebody, anybody random in no actual danger of being lynched - just to avoid the possibility of early termination until we think this through.
avatar
yogsloth: So if anybody unvotes or votes no-lynch, Day ends with no-lynch.

I would suggest a couple more people cast votes for somebody, anybody random in no actual danger of being lynched - just to avoid the possibility of early termination until we think this through.
Eh, no need to panic. There are like 3 more phases where votes can be cast. Most of the village will still be in the next town over for the next few years while we chill in the woods not getting eaten by monsters.
Is there a deadline already? I did not have the time I thought I would today... and still need to plug away a bit.

I will update the list of characters / flavor later I guess, since I saw a few more comments. And I'll keep my jokes to myself this time.

I did have one idea while working.


Nathan, I read something in the bible, so I was wondering, have you ever worked with silver?
If you can do it, maybe we could collect silver, or buy some from Nashua, and that'd help us if there is somethign unnatural threatening us.
Vote Cristigale.
avatar
Brasas: Nathan, I read something in the bible, so I was wondering, have you ever worked with silver?
If you can do it, maybe we could collect silver, or buy some from Nashua, and that'd help us if there is somethign unnatural threatening us.
If it's metal - I can make anything of it. Except for next generation inventions that are yet to be invented at this time of ours. As a last resort we can always just throw metal chunks around. At least that should hurt.

...

I see Day is going to an end. No-lynch achieved on purpose by voting for it sounds interesting. It looks like a good idea, because we don't really have any strong scum suspects and we are kind hearted loving people in general. But it is a bad idea because of the usuall - we kill scum by lynching them. No lynch means scum live, town lose, same old, same old.

Stalling and not voting at all to achieve no-lynch is even worse.

I have not made up my mind yet who I vote, but drealmer should really do something about lx. That is getting annoying.
Who says day's ending?
I assume so by drealmer starting to post vote counts more frequently.
Well, I think he was just warning us of the unusual mechanic that not voting = a vote for no-lynch, which was triggered by the majority of players putting a lynch on the table.

No word yet on when we change "phase".

Still no clear idea why we're talking about killing one another, within flavor context, either.