morolf: Aren't real autists people who live completely in their own world and basically unable to communicate?
Seems like the term is over-used...you're not an autist, if you're just socially inept or inconsiderate.
I suspect that you're just trolling, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you actually believe what you've written.
It's wrong of course, you've taken an incorrect assertion (that "real" autists live completely in their own world), applied the nebulous term "real" in order to easily discount others not fitting your definition. You've then closed off with a conclusion based on your incorrect assertion.
I think the problem you've encountered is that you've tried to classify autism by the resulting symptoms at time of diagnosis. My own view is that it is a different set of behavioural stimulus that causes distinct differences in a person's development as a child. It's certainly established that the diagnosis of autism in children (and subsequent accomodation of it) can have a distinct bearing on how they integrate into society, and how well they manage the condition.
There was a very good documentary by a BBC celebrity Chris Packham, it's not available at the moment, but you could probably find a copy if you're interested (
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09b1zbb). He describes how autism affected his life growing up, and more importantly, in my opinion, how it's then continued to affect his life going on. It's really interesting to hear how he describes the stimulus and motivations in his actions, and helps to identify how it is a separate condition.
The "real" autists you refer to, they have an overwhelming severity of the condition that stops them integrating into society. This doesn't necessarily put them in "completely in their own world", it just means that they are so driven by the impulses and obsessions that they override what would be normal behaviour because of them. Often there is some realisation that their not "supposed" to do these things, but they cannot control it.