Leonard03: Something doesn't seem to add up about HijacK's claim. If everything is as he says, what's the point of having the berserker ability? If he's already dead, then he's already lost, so why have him kill someone. It seems pointless. I realize in other cases, like vengeful, that someone kills someone else after they die, but they are still trying to help their team - they still have a chance of winning. With HijacK he wouldn't, which doesn't make sense.
Keep in mind the ability may not be to benefit him at all - it would make sense as a game balance design to punish careless play by scum, whether or not it benefited Hijack himself. They hit someone one night, assume that person was protected by a doctor and hit him again the next night without investigating assuming the doctor can't revisit, and voila. Or they hit him once and then vig unwittingly hits him. Doesn't help him a whit, sure, but still a neat feature imo.
That said, I think the question is what the hell is this particular role doing in this game. I'll admit to having uncharitable thoughts earlier - part of why I was trying to get Wyrm to talk about his 'Evil Yog' theory was to see if it would reveal what Evil Wyrm's strat to victory would be.
But...now I'm having second thoughts too. I just re-read all Leonard's posts, and similar to JMich/Wyrm last night, I don't sense any major slips at all. Some confusion certainly, but then I got to play the game with a lot more info than he had. And then there's the furniture.
His most interesting post was #156 (give or take):
Third: why is nobody talking about
yogs post above? Is he telling us there are only two scum, or just kidding around? I'm tending to think he is actually telling us there is only two scum. If not he is just muddying the waters, which he seemed against in earlier games. Therefore what else is going on? Yogs stated last game he disliked role madness, so that seems unlikely. Only two scum is unbalanced, unless that are super strong, maybe bulletproof, ninja, godfathers?"
At risk of opening the door to crazy town, I think maybe we have to think about if there's some meaning there after all. Think about it - other than maybe dedo/wyrm everyone else seems to have something about their role that makes them highly suspect. What if no one at the table IS lying?
Or maybe more likely does that post point to 2 scum + 3 independents? And if so lord I hope CSP wasn't bluffing about being town vs neutral or the whole read will be off. My next idea is even weirder so I won't even mention it.
But if it is 2 + 3 and CSP doesn't want to correct his statement, then my first feeling is that maybe we have to trust both Leon and Hijack as the two remaining neutral on the table. Which would take us back to JMich, as the only person left at the table without some other night action, who did conveniently go un-blocked.
Personally I'd even be willing to extend a guarantee we wouldn't nail CSP on LAL if he is neutral and has a non-combative win condition, though obv. he'd need a majority for that to be worth anything and not just me. But it strikes me as potentially important enough to offer the deal, even if the answer is that he's really town.
Sigh. Anyway, I'm going to go watch Netflix and try not to think about this game at all until tomorrow.