That's a very specific assumption. I was expecting rolecop or something similar like Joe was.

The fact you used the word bulletproof? That's kind of thin...

So what did tweety do to me?

I think we're waiting on trent replying to bjgames before we'll find out that.

Doesn't looks specific to me at all. If there is a backup something there has to be a main same thing. Either one has the potential of clearing the other one if they claim first (the backup knows there is the main, the main knows someone knows about the main existing). Sort of like masons but without the information from the start.

So we've got:

vitek, cleared by zfr,
nmillar, cleared by vitek,
bj, cleared by lift,
joe, cleared by bj,
dedo
catte

:/

When did that happen?

I know, but there isn't really anything else from D1. Crumbing only took place from the first post of D2.

No no no. I've just reread bjgamer's's post and the implication is that we know you didn't do the kill last night.

:/

Oh well. It would have been helpful but never mind.

oh. yeah it does say that.

So it's:

Vitek, cleared by ZFR
nmillar, cleared by Vitek,
BJ, cleared by Lift,
Joe
Dedo
Catte


maybe a no-lunch is the best thing for today and tomorrow someone might have some new info

Well, down to 3 it's pretty much a standoff so another night is probably a good idea. I know it's you and dedo, you will say it's me and dedo and dedo will say it's you and me.

Of course for me it doesn't matter which of the two of you are lynched because both of you are mafia (let's face it, if the mafia are Vitek and Nmillar then they've already won, and deservedly so).
The two of you would probably prefer to see me lynched first seeing as it'd be an instant win for you. Bussing your buddy would then require you to survive the final three. I think we have too many useful roles for you to survive that.

No lunch sounds like a good plan.

I'm not even referring to that. I said what I was referring to and how I read it. And if they are in fact scum and are making a (masterful, I have to admit) play there what they have been saying and doing doesn't really mean anything, does it? Anyway, as I said - they are definitely together. I'm not trying to get them lynched actively but I'm considering all options as a rushed lynch can cost us the game. The Russian roulette game and the mafia game before that were educational enough for me.

Sure but unlike what others said or didn't say nmillar's hint made sense in that way and that's how I read it. If they are what they claim to be it's only natural that you and Joe would try and twist my words in whatever way it may push your agenda just a little farther.

Heh.

To be honest I wouldn't have a preference on which one of you goes first if a mislynch didn't mean the game. Unless BJ's question reveals some game changing information I'd rather give everyone a chance at another round of investigations and have better odds Tomorrow when hopefully wiggling room for scum would be decreased to suffocating proportions.

And we somehow knew that instead of getting lynched ZFR
will shoot me, I will survive because reasons and it will clear me and we will ride the wave to victory. Whoever even tries to entertain the idea (much sillier than 3 team I had at the spur of moment) is either crazy or more likely trying to find at least some possible way out of the corner.

I would need to hear full claim from BJG but I am not supporting no-lynch at the moment. Currently I feel like it would only get us rid of more or less confirmed player and would leave the decision in hands of more doubtful players.
Besides I don't like no-lynches at all.

Uh, sorry sweetie - no. If you had looked at the post I referred you to at the top we made a teasing remark about you being a hot commodity everywhere.

@Catte - You mentioned a redirector. Is there a reason you think there may be a redirector?