It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Ah, now we're back to feelings. And yet, just a few posts ago, I very clearly and obviously acted in a way that can only come from a scum mindset.

The move has turned out just fine in terms of my hopes, and neither has anything to do with mchack.
No need to repeat that I'm not scum, or how it makes no sense for me to have made the play you think I made.

Something crossed my mind that would be hilarious if it happened.
You did, but then I stepped back. I'm not ruling it out (and I'd already marked you out as mchack's possible partner even before all this) but your recent interactions with him do give me pause so if that is distancing, well done it's working.

Good, if you are town that should be good for all of us.

It may have crossed my mind too, though I'm not sure we're thinking the same thing.
avatar
mchack: even if he'll get converted like adalia seems to think, that's still one nightaction used that they can't use to nk town then)
avatar
ZFR: But that's one nightaction they used to convert town, which is worse than nk town.
It's like saying you're happy your leg got amputated because at least now it won't be broken.
nope. it isn't when you just lynch the townie before scum having to nk or convert him. and then they either convert or kill another town. nothing gained.

----

avatar
mchack: [...] Scumhunting is doubly the way to go this game. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Scum-hunting and tunnelling are not the same thing.
true. but I'm not the only scumhunter around. others will hopefully pick up the truckloads of stuff that I missed. there is 8 townies in game you know. And scum is probably also scumhunting.

avatar
mchack: [...] give the man a chance to talk before lynching at least. if indeed town vanilla he shouldn't be lynched (which would be saving scum a nk - even if he'll get converted like adalia seems to think, that's still one nightaction used that they can't use to nk town then) [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Two questions for you:

- Why would either of the scum team waste a perfectly good NK on a confirmed Town Vanilla when they can convert them and increase their numbers?
- Which is worse for town, to have two NK-ed, or to have one converted and one NK-ed? In the first scenario, town's down by two, but scum numbers remain the same; in the second one, town's still down by two, but one scum team is now up by one. Which scenario brings town closer to victory?
- They wouldn't. but then we know where to look. he'll be suspected till end game but how is that worse than lynching him while he's town thereby wasting a chance to hit scum that day, which gets even higher if you can rule out a "confirmed town vanilla" (which flub isn't by a long shot) and giving scum the chance to convert someone else entirely that is not suspected in endgame
-the first scenario is better for town I suspect. but I don't really see how it applies here, because both scenarios can happen whether we lynch flub or not. if flub is town, then let me ask you: which scenario is better for town a) lynching a known townie b) lynching someone else with the (then even higher) chance of hitting scum and learning something new by the flip.

----

avatar
mchack: Don't do scums work for them! (unless you are actually scum, then go right ahead and lynch someone you "in fact do believe is town")

also again: the advertising as being a good knowledgable recruit that will bring new tactics to his buddies once they recruit him...
avatar
adaliabooks: I'm not. I'm doing our work for tomorrow so we don't have to.
Let's say we don't lynch flub and we lynch someone else. They're likely to be town too, might even force a mason to claim, so we don't really gain much there.
oh that's where I think you are wrong:
I already did post a bit on chances before and said that the masons are much harder to lynch D1 (they know each other) so they shouldn't be forced to claim in that case and if you also take a known townie (which flub isn't in my book) from that then there's only 4 vanilla vs 4 scum left. 50% chance. In no way more likely a town lynch than scum lynch.

avatar
adaliabooks: Then in the night flub is recruited (or even worse case, scum guess correctly and convert a different townie in which case we lynch flub tomorrow assuming he's been converted when he hasn't) and we lynch him tomorrow. We gain no info from tomorrow's lynch because of course everyone will vote flub if we assume he has been converted.
if we assume that. But if we do or don't will be our choosing based on the information we have tomorrow. (we'll maybe see that there a 2 nk and so know that flub was not converted) who knows. I'd rather have someone I suspect around that I can question, than killing him of while believing him town for the off chance he might become scum next day. Also flub was converted last game after going "suicidal" town and he was indeed our first scum lynch then and the game was over with the next lynch D2 Town win. Don't know how this game would have went if we had lynched flub D1

avatar
mchack: I totally agree thats the case when scum.
But if you try to look at it from a town perspective, where does the info come from? ok the flip which will be 2 town vanilla dead in most games (lynch + nk) and in this it might be 3 town vanilla dead (lynch + 2 nk). So how is this better information to get to a town game winning state if looking at the wagon helps noone because noone bothered to scumhunt or put reasons or stances down for his vote but just voted the next best person, because he felt like it. or just voted whoever was prettiest at the moment?
avatar
adaliabooks: The flip.
We have no investigative roles so the only info we ever get is the flip (and masons claiming, which in this game is solid confirmation if all of them do).
Right now we have to choose 4 from 12, including a lot of noise like flub and Krypsyn and the lurkers like Leonard and Sage.
Tomorrow we may only have to choose 4 from 9. If the masons all survive the night and claim then it's 4 from 6. Plus the record of today to root out the townies from the bunch.

How is that not a better winning state?
Well we don't loose the info from the flip by continueing to scumhunt, do we? What changes by not piling up on flubs reaching for a fast lynch of someone you believe to be town, other than having less information to go on day 2?
avatar
Leonard03: Ok, I understand your reasoning behind this now, but it doesn't make sense as a play before people thought he was a vanilla towny. Sooo... why did you vote for him then? There wasn't anything saying he had to die.
I didn't.

I voted him when he said he this:

avatar
flubbucket: I know I'm a sensible lynch at this juncture.
For reasons I won't get into yet (but that I hinted at at the time) I took that to be him claiming vanilla and voted him accordingly. The obvious argument is the one I've already made, that only a vanilla townie would court a lynch today (the reason I believe flub may have done that is one I'll go into later or after the game, though it may not be the reason he used).

So I'm not sure what exactly you are alluding to by saying I voted him before I thought he was a vanilla townie?
avatar
trentonlf: [...] @Hyper, Lynching someone you think is probably town is not a pro town play, even in this setup if you think that person is vanilla. The pro town play is to try and lynch scum, but I’m not going to convince adalia of that because he is dead set on lynching flub simply because flub asked to be lynched and he feels flub is town vanilla.
Yes, trentonlf, the pro-town play is to try and lynch scum, and that's precisely why I'm scum-hunting and questioning what people say, and trying to get them to talk and be on record in case we don't hit scum Today.

But if we can't get a consensus on who to lynch as scum, depriving scum from a "guaranteed" conversion is the next best thing we can achieve Today. This way, flubbucket's death won't be in vain, and certainly not just a random choice to avoid No-Lynch.



avatar
Leonard03: [...] Sooo... why did you vote for him then? There wasn't anything saying he had to die.
Define "then". Preferably by pointing to the specific post.



avatar
adaliabooks: You did, but then I stepped back. I'm not ruling it out (and I'd already marked you out as mchack's possible partner even before all this) but your recent interactions with him do give me pause so if that is distancing, well done it's working. [...]
I didn't; you insisted in reading things only in a certain way. Whether that's due to tunnelling or having an agenda, I haven't decided yet.

I have no reason to try and distance from mchack. You choose to see it as such because you either fail or refuse to see that my questioning others isn't about him or defending him.


avatar
adaliabooks: [...] It may have crossed my mind too, though I'm not sure we're thinking the same thing.
We'll see post game.
avatar
Leonard03: Ok, I understand your reasoning behind this now, but it doesn't make sense as a play before people thought he was a vanilla towny. Sooo... why did you vote for him then? There wasn't anything saying he had to die.
avatar
adaliabooks: I didn't.

I voted him when he said he this:

avatar
flubbucket: I know I'm a sensible lynch at this juncture.
avatar
adaliabooks: For reasons I won't get into yet (but that I hinted at at the time) I took that to be him claiming vanilla and voted him accordingly. The obvious argument is the one I've already made, that only a vanilla townie would court a lynch today (the reason I believe flub may have done that is one I'll go into later or after the game, though it may not be the reason he used).

So I'm not sure what exactly you are alluding to by saying I voted him before I thought he was a vanilla townie?
You took flub's post to be serious (something I still wouldn't necessarily do). Then came to the conclusion that the only role to look to be lynched day 1 was a vanilla townie. You then assumed scum and presumably all the other players in the game, would come to a similar conclusion as you. My point is that before you explained all this, there wasn't a need for the vote. Now that you've explained all your reasons it changes things, but that's a different matter.

avatar
Leonard03: [...] Sooo... why did you vote for him then? There wasn't anything saying he had to die.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Define "then". Preferably by pointing to the specific post.
See above.
avatar
Leonard03: Do we just sit around and hope the mafia kill each other off? I'd rather take a proactive role in rooting them out.
I like that a lot! So, what are your current thoughts? What's the plan?

avatar
Leonard03: And why the heck would he want to be lynched? Sure we're closer to lynching mafia next day, but overall we've progressed mafia win condition more than our own. Also, flub never really seemed the suicidal type.
Have considered asking flub these things?
avatar
Leonard03: Do we just sit around and hope the mafia kill each other off? I'd rather take a proactive role in rooting them out.
avatar
dedoporno: I like that a lot! So, what are your current thoughts? What's the plan?
Pop open adalia's brain and see what's inside. Either that or possibly ZFR, I don't like his voting patterns, thought that just may be from the much faster pace style of Resistance. I'd do mchack as well, just because of how is posting style changes when various parties turned up the heat. It's interesting how much more verbose he gets, something I think I remember happening last game I played in when he was scum.

avatar
dedoporno: Have considered asking flub these things?
I was honestly kind of assuming flub would address the whole situation when he makes an appearance again. I don't think he can exactly afford not to.
avatar
Leonard03: You took flub's post to be serious (something I still wouldn't necessarily do). Then came to the conclusion that the only role to look to be lynched day 1 was a vanilla townie. You then assumed scum and presumably all the other players in the game, would come to a similar conclusion as you. My point is that before you explained all this, there wasn't a need for the vote. Now that you've explained all your reasons it changes things, but that's a different matter.
I came to that conclusion and considered it worthy of voting him because mchack's wagon wasn't going anywhere and for the other reason I won't go into.

I went into my reasons because a number of other players (trent did, I think mchack did too, I don't have time to check right now) had mentioned he might be vanilla town so I decided it was worth the risk of bringing the point into the open about why he should be lynched.

I didn't need to explain it to everyone else to know it was the case.
avatar
Leonard03: Pop open adalia's brain and see what's inside. Either that or possibly ZFR, I don't like his voting patterns, thought that just may be from the much faster pace style of Resistance.
Actually, serious question. How fast realistically is Lifthrasil likely to declare that day ends? Is it 1-2 days? Several? Week?
avatar
Leonard03: Pop open adalia's brain and see what's inside. Either that or possibly ZFR, I don't like his voting patterns, thought that just may be from the much faster pace style of Resistance.
avatar
ZFR: Actually, serious question. How fast realistically is Lifthrasil likely to declare that day ends? Is it 1-2 days? Several? Week?
I'd think around 3 days, that's about a week total RL time for day one.
avatar
Leonard03: Pop open adalia's brain and see what's inside. Either that or possibly ZFR, I don't like his voting patterns, thought that just may be from the much faster pace style of Resistance.
avatar
ZFR: Actually, serious question. How fast realistically is Lifthrasil likely to declare that day ends? Is it 1-2 days? Several? Week?
We get a 48 hour notice before the day will end so a deadline is at least 48 hours away until Lift announces one.
avatar
ZFR: Actually, serious question. How fast realistically is Lifthrasil likely to declare that day ends? Is it 1-2 days? Several? Week?
avatar
Leonard03: I'd think around 3 days, that's about a week total RL time for day one.
That sounds about right. (Really just popping the next page because it says there are new posts)
avatar
Leonard03: I'd do mchack as well, just because of how is posting style changes when various parties turned up the heat. It's interesting how much more verbose he gets, something I think I remember happening last game I played in when he was scum.
well, if you want to compare that to one of my town games: try and read last game (it was quite short. town won. (spoiler: I posted like I do in this game) added bonus: flub was town and converted)
avatar
adaliabooks: [...] (or even worse case, scum guess correctly and convert a different townie in which case we lynch flub tomorrow assuming he's been converted when he hasn't) and we lynch him tomorrow. We gain no info from tomorrow's lynch because of course everyone will vote flub if we assume he has been converted. [...]
And broadcasting the certain lynch of flubbucket on D2 due to said suspicion helps us how exactly?



avatar
mchack: [...] and then they either convert or kill another town. nothing gained. [...]
You seem to disregard that not all potential NK targets are town. You also seem to disregard that not all potential targets can be converted. The gain comes from making their choice more difficult, and increasing the risks of choosing a conversion over the NK.


avatar
mchack: [...] - They wouldn't. but then we know where to look. he'll be suspected till end game but how is that worse than lynching him while he's town thereby wasting a chance to hit scum that day, which gets even higher if you can rule out a "confirmed town vanilla" (which flub isn't by a long shot) and giving scum the chance to convert someone else entirely that is not suspected in endgame [...]
So, your idea is to keep flubbucket around till end game if he openly confirms to be Town Vanilla Today?

See my reply to trentonlf for aiming for a scum lynch, and above for the rest. I won't touch the endgame bit as it's not prudent at this point in the game.


avatar
mchack: [...] -the first scenario is better for town I suspect. but I don't really see how it applies here, because both scenarios can happen whether we lynch flub or not. if flub is town, then let me ask you: which scenario is better for town a) lynching a known townie b) lynching someone else with the (then even higher) chance of hitting scum and learning something new by the flip. [...]
If we don't agree on a possible scum lynch, and we don't lynch flubbucket either, which scenario has better chances of happening N1?

The better scenario for town is to lynch scum, of course. Do we have a suitable candidate? Suggest away, but with actual arguments, not tunnel and omgus feelings.



avatar
mchack: [...] Also flub was converted last game after going "suicidal" town and he was indeed our first scum lynch then and the game was over with the next lynch D2 Town win. Don't know how this game would have went if we had lynched flub D1 [...]
Would flubbucket still be our first D2 scum lynch had he not been investigated N1?

Please take a good look at the setup we have here, then tell which role will provide us with investigative results D2.



avatar
Leonard03: You took flub's post to be serious (something I still wouldn't necessarily do). Then came to the conclusion that the only role to look to be lynched day 1 was a vanilla townie. [...]
Please take a good look at the setup we're in, then tell what other role would be looking to be lynched D1.

And I will repeat my suggestion to ISO flubbucket from game #51.


avatar
Leonard03: [...] I don't think he can exactly afford not to.
Please elaborate.
Listen to Krypsyn. He is wise to the ways of the Farce.