I will not double post again!
lol. busted scum. now you are getting cold feet and want to jump wagons to save you skin?
and to lynch someone that you know is town but think you won't be held accountable for in lynching?
no this is muddying the waters. There is only one choice that will shed light on this near 600 post D1. Either me or adalia.
you made your choice. no going back into hiding now.
I'm sorry, were you appointed Policeman Officer of Votes and I somehow missed it?
Had you spent a little of the time you sacrificed from your sleep last night to actually read my post carefully to the end, you'd know I'm not deviating from my stated position.
Then again, you may well have, but can't but keep up the facade; can't really fault you for that.
adaliabooks is not an option for me Today.
But do tell, how do I know
that any of the lynch candidates are town?
trentonlf: ~ The Story of Bob and Fred ~
Please answer why you wouldn't pursue adaliabooks lynch a 200 posts or so back, since, up to this point, he was a scum read of yours, and as per your earlier statements you'd not vote for flubbucket.
This is where I’m legitimately stumped though, from my perspective it seems like both mchack and adalia are doing the same thing with opposing viewpoints. Am I missing something wrt mchack? Is my scumdar broken? [...]
Whether your scumdar is broken or not, genuinely or not, I can't say.
mchack argues the "townie" side of things; is this something that town and town only would do?
adaliabooks is arguing the seemingly "anti-town" side of things; is arguing against it something that town and town alone would do? More importantly, why would scum come out D1 and make that argument, more so in the way and with the persistence that he has? If anything, it may well get them under heavy fire right out the gate, and we're talking two 2-man scum teams here. Has mchack stopped even for a minute to ask himself? Has he offered a plausible explanation for it?
Additionally, mchack faulted adaliabooks for coming forward with his take/strategy on things (remember that "don't you dare blame me for doing it!"?), then proceeded spilling more beans and reminding scum of more options and alternatives they have when counter-arguing with him.
Because scum are smart, pay attention, will go over every detail, and will discuss things anyway, so it doesn't really matter. But somehow none of this seems to apply when it comes to any of the things adaliabooks has said.
But for me, it's not the viewpoint that mchack is arguing; it has merit, and can be argued from town and scum alike, only motives change. Or that he's arguing against adaliabooks' one; opposition can come from either side, again just different motives for it. It's how he carries himself when making his arguments ever since the initial heat he got cooled down. I've seen it before in game #31, and I don't think he's experienced enough yet to have grown out of his scum meta.
Does this answer your question?
[...] How are you so sure that Trent is town? [...]
Heh, good catch there; I missed the use of "when".
I see no need to get snarky, looks like I’m making bad arguments or asking irrelevant/stupid questions but you could’ve at least said that straight. Vote trentonlf
Hmm... Are you voting him because you think he's scum(my), or because you got annoyed by his response?