It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
trentonlf: I would seriously consider it.
avatar
dedoporno: Are you entirely discarding the flavor just as flavor?
Unless there is some way to confirm anything I will always consider flavor just as flavor.
avatar
flubbucket: Since both can't be true...No.

You should then be lynched for lying.
avatar
Hunter65536: I didn't say I found everyone one suspicious I asked if your reaction would be different if I had said that, so what's your answer?
You're flailing.

I was quite clear.

Should you decide to change your mind and claim to find everyone suspicious how can both be true??

Do you find everyone suspicious??
avatar
flubbucket: You're flailing.

I was quite clear.

Should you decide to change your mind and claim to find everyone suspicious how can both be true??

Do you find everyone suspicious??
Let's take you for example, you said that I was suspicious and voted for me, does that mean you don't suspect other players at all? It just means they weren't suspicious enough to vote for a lynch. Unless you're scum then you could probably be not suspicious of few people.
avatar
flubbucket: You're flailing.

I was quite clear.

Should you decide to change your mind and claim to find everyone suspicious how can both be true??

Do you find everyone suspicious??
avatar
Hunter65536: Let's take you for example, you said that I was suspicious and voted for me, does that mean you don't suspect other players at all? It just means they weren't suspicious enough to vote for a lynch. Unless you're scum then you could probably be not suspicious of few people.
The difference being I never said I find no one suspicious.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: How long do you propose we wait for cops to claim results?
I'm not proposing anything yet. I'm asking questions.


avatar
trentonlf: Unless there is some way to confirm anything I will always consider flavor just as flavor.
Noted, thank you.


avatar
Hunter65536: Let's take you for example, you said that I was suspicious and voted for me, does that mean you don't suspect other players at all? It just means they weren't suspicious enough to vote for a lynch. Unless you're scum then you could probably be not suspicious of few people.
This is getting interesting.
avatar
flubbucket: The difference being I never said I find no one suspicious.
Suspicious enough to vote, that's what I said in my . You changed my statement in this [url=https://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_38_murder_on_the_wing_game_thread/post129]post and stuck to your own version.
At least with regards to no-lynch, I don't really see how that helps much day 2. At best, you get an additional cop read that probably won't get revealed to us. Meanwhile, we get no information while scum picks us off. Day 2 starts almost as uninformed as day 1 except for the surprise town flip from the scum kill. And this isn't to mention the possibility of an arsonist.

Then you have to consider the likelihood that the cop dies before we find out anything at all...

Pushing for no-lynch so early gives us next to nothing.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: But are they sane cops with useful results? Do we have a pair of parity cops?
Are you maligning parity cops - greatest of all cops - here, my good sir?
avatar
trentonlf: There is no confirmation there's cops in the game, why would you vote for a no lynch?
Mostly to see what other things of it in the context of the current game. Also, I guess I'm more inclined than you to believe flavor isn't just flavor. I do suspect the game is designed to have no lynch sooner or later and I do take into account bler's stance towards that notion and some of the hints/explanations he gave before starting. But I agree that it's highly unlikely it will happen anyway and probably not a good idea to do it immediately.
avatar
trentonlf: There is no confirmation there's cops in the game, why would you vote for a no lynch?
avatar
dedoporno: Mostly to see what other things of it in the context of the current game. Also, I guess I'm more inclined than you to believe flavor isn't just flavor. I do suspect the game is designed to have no lynch sooner or later and I do take into account bler's stance towards that notion and some of the hints/explanations he gave before starting. But I agree that it's highly unlikely it will happen anyway and probably not a good idea to do it immediately.
I am not always against a no lynch, there are situations where it's viable, but I don't think day 1 with no info to go on is viable.
avatar
flubbucket: The difference being I never said I find no one suspicious.
avatar
Hunter65536: Suspicious enough to vote, that's what I said in my . You changed my statement in this [url=https://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_38_murder_on_the_wing_game_thread/post129]post and stuck to your own version.
So then you do find someone suspicious yet opted to Vote No Lynch.......why??
No Lynch seems fun. Silly, a bit anti-town, but fun ... in the Dwarf Fortress sense of the word.

Need I remind you guys that there are an ODD number of players in the game? Jeesh!

...

Having said that, I'll go along with a No Lynch if that is what folks want. I always like a good train wreck...
avatar
flubbucket: So then you do find someone suspicious yet opted to Vote No Lynch.......why??
As of now, I said I didn't find anyone suspicious enough to vote. If I did my vote would change from no-lynch to whoever that person is.
avatar
Krypsyn: Need I remind you guys that there are an ODD number of players in the game? Jeesh!
You sure that's not "a number of ODD players in the game"?
It seems silly to be actually voting "No-Lynch" while you are undecided, why not just not vote like so many others?

By voting it seems you are advocating that position.