Posted October 21, 2011
Parvateshwar: I'm speaking as someone who liked the old Dooms and played some of Doom3. I file Doom in the same category as Duke Nukem, games that were fun and totally awesome in the 90s but have failed to keep up with modern shooters. With Mass Effect, Modern Warfare, Killzone, Gears of War, Half-Life, Halo, Crysis, Resistance etc., the market is absolutely saturated with big name shooters from the past 5 years, and if Doom 4 wants to stand out they are going to have to do a HELL of a lot of inventing. As Duke Nukem Forever pointed out, its an uphill battle trying to bring a game from the past up-to-date and to surpass those games. Sure, they have a decent sized fanbase, but that isn't going to compete with the annoyingly HUGE fanbase of those listed games, most of which have sequels, threequels, and octequels that are coming up.
On the other hand, Doom games were awesome and if this is a rumour it would be super sweet. Betheseda already reinvented Fallout and it was pretty damn fun, maybe they can bring this old franchise back and make it better than ever.
As you can see I'm torn, but whatever happens it's going to be interesting.
But despite all that inventing, none of them have managed to out-do Doom on its own turf. Unlike Duke Nukem 3d, which has been outdone by other games in most ways, Doom still has the best pure "mob shooter" gameplay out there. Even Quake I didn't manage to get it as right as Doom did (although I personally prefer Quake I just for it's unique art style). And this is not coming from someone who has fond childhood memories of Doom, either.On the other hand, Doom games were awesome and if this is a rumour it would be super sweet. Betheseda already reinvented Fallout and it was pretty damn fun, maybe they can bring this old franchise back and make it better than ever.
As you can see I'm torn, but whatever happens it's going to be interesting.