It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I'm here! Sorry, I'm away visiting family and my time has not been my own. I did read last night, but started getting sleepy before posting. I'm reading today's posts now.
avatar
supplementscene: Yes okay, I can aknowledge I maybe wrong and it may not be a slip.
avatar
dedoporno: I thought you were locked on this being a slip. Does this mean you aren't that sure and just hoping it will work out?

avatar
supplementscene: But SPF and Dedo really should have voted by now. Because we are at risk of not lynching today the way the votes are stacked.
avatar
dedoporno: I will vote once I get back home from work as I want to go back and re-read your and Lift's posts.

The deadline is 12 hours as of this posts, I should be able to place my vote in about 6 hours (or earlier, if possible).

avatar
blotunga: Do we want a no-lynch? i think we rather not. I will try to be more active a bit later if we start to hear from others too.
avatar
dedoporno: We don't want a no-lynch.
For the risk of no lynch, why not vote now in case you can't access the internet later? Then change your vote after the re-read if that changes your opinion.

I've re-read the thread and I'm in 2 minds now over Blotunga now. I actually gave Blotunga an out, that I shouldn't have done. I said you're either Mafia or Doctor. If I'd made a slip and I was asked if I was mafia or doctor I think I would have claimed doctor. He didn't, which might mean it wasn't a slip. And if Zafirius and Saphirius is the same word in Hungarian then perhaps he could of skimread and thought he'd seen ZFRs name and then thought that was the night kill target that didnt happen. But then he could be Mafia, know the night kill, think he's seen ZFRs name and then talk about ZFR as the night kill.

However ZFR asked me if I thought he was the nightkill target Blotunga aside. ZFR got quite a few votes on Day 1, which makes him a less desirable night kill target.

I don't know, I'd lynch Blotunga just 'to know' at this stage

avatar
blotunga: Do we want a no-lynch? i think we rather not.
avatar
Lifthrasil: No, definitely not. No-lynch is usually the worst for town that can happen, since it deprives town of information.

avatar
supplementscene: At the moment I kind of have more of a problem with 5 players that haven't voted rather than 1 player voting for a lurky player.
avatar
Lifthrasil: And yet you vote for a player that has voted and isn't lurky. Doing exactly what you accuse me of: hopping on the train that seemed most promising at the time.

But you know what, you're right in one point: with only 11 hours to go, there isn't much time left to secure a lynch. SPF seems to be protected by 'he always lurks like that'. Unfortunately. And I don't see anyone else following my reasoning for voting blotunga either. So, even though I'll be accused of vote hopping and OMGUS again, I'll put my vote back to where it might still be useful.

vote Scene
Right but I haven't advocated targeting lurkers first and foremost. You have. I've attempted to find the most suspicious players. From Day 1 I've stated I look closely at how wagons grow and it has appeared like you've picked convenient wagons. And now you've just done it again. Blotunga had a vote and interest from others so you get on that wagon. Now you've gone back to me again, knowing that Trent, Dedo and ZFR are very willing to lynch me. With SPF and Korotan you knew you wouldn't get much back from them as SPF rarely posts and Korotan is inexperienced. It's all too convenient and it's not going with any conviction about scumhunting in my opinion.

I remember the first game I played I was convinced by I think yourself, to go after lurkers after initially suspecting yourself for lynching ZFR on Day 1. This ended up being quite fruitless while you loomed in daylight as Mafia.
Damn, it feels like that Lifthrasil dragon built really fast.
avatar
JoeSapphire: 3 - ThrashSeal (Lifthrasil) - Trentonlf, HypersomniacLive, Supplementscene,


Lifthrasil currently holds the most votes at 4 away from majority.
Majority is 6, right? Lift is at L-3.
avatar
supplementscene: For the risk of no lynch, why not vote now in case you can't access the internet later? Then change your vote after the re-read if that changes your opinion.
vote scene

Fine, I'm going with you then but I do want to go back and have a second look. I also want to try and see what a number of others are seeing in Lift.


avatar
SirPrimalform: Damn, it feels like that Lifthrasil dragon built really fast.
What are your thoughts and lynch choices then?
avatar
ZFR: Majority is 6, right? Lift is at L-3.
It's still 7. There are 12 alive players right now.
avatar
ZFR: Majority is 6, right? Lift is at L-3.
avatar
dedoporno: It's still 7. There are 12 alive players right now.
No it's 6, we started with 12 and there are 11 players currently
avatar
ZFR: Majority is 6, right? Lift is at L-3.
avatar
dedoporno: It's still 7. There are 12 alive players right now.
There are 11 players. 12 at start and Fran was out.

Register:
01 - M. Moutard (PookaMustard)
02 - ThrashSeal (Lifthrasil)
03 - The Supplement (Supplementscene)
04 - Zephyr (ZFR)
06 - Micro Fist (Microfishd)
07 - Inkblot (blotunga)
08 - Serpent Rime (SirPrimalform)
09 - The Canton Calf (Trentonlf)
10 - The Hypersomniac (HypersomniacLive)
11 - Koro-Koro Tank (korotan)
12 - DeadProng (Dedoporno)
avatar
dedoporno: It's still 7. There are 12 alive players right now.
avatar
supplementscene: No it's 6, we started with 12 and there are 11 players currently
You are correct, 6 is how many it should be
@PookaMustard, SirPrimalform, Microfishd, Korotan: the Day is close to it's end. Please make up your mind whom to vote for.
avatar
trentonlf: You are correct, 6 is how many it should be
I stand corrected. 6 is enough.
avatar
ZFR: Can we perhaps say whom are we willinv to vote, with the deadline looming.

I'd really love to go with blotunga or scene.

Willing to go Lift (for his later behaviour) or Pooka for his early day behaviour.

SPF or Micro, in that order, in order to avoid a no lynch.

Not willing HSL, Koro, trent and dedo.
My top 3 choices are currently

1.Lift
2.Blotunga
3.SPF

Also willing to lynch HSL or Trent but I don't think we have the numbers for them.

Not sure I'm willing to go for Pooka or Micro in his first game despite him being lurky. And I realise I'm contradictory as it's Blotunga's first game too but I have more of a scent on Blotunga.
avatar
supplementscene: Right but I haven't advocated targeting lurkers first and foremost. You have.
No, I haven't. But thanks for the misrepresentation, it confirms that you only see what you want to see. I said repeatedly that going after lurkers is a fallback solution when there are no other, better leads. That is something quite different from 'targeting lurkers first and foremost'.

avatar
supplementscene: I've attempted to find the most suspicious players. From Day 1 I've stated I look closely at how wagons grow and it has appeared like you've picked convenient wagons. And now you've just done it again. Blotunga had a vote and interest from others so you get on that wagon.
And another misrepresentation. Blotunga wasn't the most convenient wagon when I voted him. You were. You had the same number of votes (one) and the interest of more players that Blotunga. And before that I was the only one voting SPF. How is that 'picking the most convenient wagon'?

I'll tell you what 'picking the most convenient wagon is'. It's selecting the only player with two votes on them and adding your vote. Which is exactly what you did, as soon as I had two votes on me. Which kind of fits your MO in this game. After all you started the game in the same way: out of all players you picked the only one who already had a (random) vote on him.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Yep. That's me. Always dodging your questions. Sorry if I have other suspect priorities than you. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: You can have whatever suspects and related priorities you want. That's not the point. It's the way you've been going about things all Day long (trentonlf, PookaMustard, Korotan, supplementscene, and now SirPrimalform), and how you word/frame things (trentonlf/supplementscene, PookaMustard, Korotan, and now SirPrimalform further down); as I've said, your scum-hunting looks and feels superficial, like you're mimicking your established town-play to appear to be game-solving.

You never directly address the things I question/challenge you about, often going for the "oops" excuse which you then use to appear hard at game-solving and scum-hunting (like with PookaMustard and supplementscene), and straight out ignore my follow up when I lay out how you dance around and dodge my questions.

Take this for example:

avatar
Lifthrasil: [...] Korotan latching on to that flimsy reason looked over-eager. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: It'd seem that you look at Korotan's (re)actions in a vacuum, and that's the good version of it. In context, it comes across as trying to find things to pick on the easiest target, the weakest player (no offence, Korotan) who can't defend themself well. And when attention is drawn to it, you find a reason to back-pedal.

A broader look at your votes, and assuming they are honestly your suspects, I definitely don't like how you frame things. Look at how you prefaced your current vote on SirPrimalform for example [emphasis added]:

avatar
Lifthrasil: [...] SPF is also still scummy. Either of these two would be a viable lynch for today in my eyes. Actually, I'll put them on equal footing for now. Then you all can decide which wagon to drive.

vote SPF [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: What's that supposed to mean? It reads to me like you're trying to create a dichotomy - "it's either SirPrimalform or supplementscene" - and at the same time, shift responsibility about the outcome on the rest of us.

avatar
Lifthrasil: [...] But what about you? As usual, you ask a lot of questions but you don't share much of your own suspicions. So, who are your main suspects and why? [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Almost sounds like it bothers you that I'm not more open so you can't adjust your play to get off my radar.
You're a smart person, Lifthrasil, does it really come as a surprise that you're my main suspect at the moment after the way I've questioned you since the start of D2?

People say you've upped your game, and while that may be true, I look at your play, and a few too many things don't add up with you this game. I've wondered if I'm reading too much into them, hence I've asked others about it, but I haven't got much feedback (only trentonlf and somewhat ZFR chimed in).

Vote Lifthrasil

@all, asking again - am I reading too much into all of this?

I prefer Lifthrasil, but willing to go with supplementscene (indeed, dedoporno makes a good point, I think Lifthrasil made a similar one earlier) and SirPrimalform (even though Lifthrasl's voting him), not sure about anyone else even to avoid No-Lynch.

Also, meant to ask @ZFR - is Microfishd on the table for the same reasons as Yesterday, or has anything changed Today?
No offense taken. I know I am not the best and I stayed here because I want to learn to stand and fight for myself instead of just always running away when something hurts me.
avatar
supplementscene: A potential slip of Mafia knowledge is a weaker reason than voting for a lurky player? Especially when you used the exact same logic in voting for SPF? This is another example of your analysis not sounding genuine.
avatar
Lifthrasil: I didn't see that as potential slip of Mafia knowledge and I think I made that clear. As did others. The only one sticking to that was you. And voting for a lurky player is a good fallback solution if there is no other candidate to be found. But blotunga didn't even try to find a scummy player. He just voted for a player, who is less lurky than himself, for being lurky. That is hypocritical and makes the accusation of lurkiness seem like pretense. I encourage you to compare blotunga and Pooka and then tell me who of those two is lurkier. All blotunga did today was defend against you accusation. Pooka at least made an effort.
I can see somehow your reason because his vote seems strange and even less effertort than I think I did. But about hypocrit you critisized me for jumping around arround and now I see you jumping too.

Mayby I am taking it to personal too but what Blotunga did whas just one step above what DeadPorno would be ready to do too if I understood him correct. For me it really seems you just for those who you find fitting to pick up on and talk back when other confront you with questions and sayings that they make think first they are idiots.
VOTE TrashSeal
avatar
ZFR: The OP flavour slipped my mind. Though to be honest I would keep my mind open to all possibilities just the same
avatar
ZFR: @HSL. Micro:
To be honest, after his posts today, he pings me slightly less of a fake newbie. But still not sure about him enough to keep him on my better-than-no'lynch list.
[emphasis added]

To be honest, that's quite a bit of "to be honest".

On a different note, interesting how Microfishd's D2 activity shifted your and dedoporno's view into different directions.


avatar
ZFR: Majority is 6, right? Lift is at L-3.
I also noticed that the mod's count to majority is off since the start of D2, and was going to ask about it.



avatar
Lifthrasil: No, that bothers me, like it bothers me in every game we play together, because you attack everyone for every perceived mistake they make without ever revealing anything of yourself. That is especially bothersome when you are scum. You hide behind walls of questions just like flubb hides behind being useless. And yes, I knew I would be your main suspect from the moment on you started questioning me. I always am, independent of the factions involved. But contrary to what you assume I'm not planning to get off your radar. Experience taught me, that that is impossible. So I decided even before the game started not to be bothered by your inquisition this time. I just play the game in my way and try to find scum in my way without worrying about pleasing you. That makes the game more fun than double checking every post wondering 'what could HSL take issue at this time'. [...]
That's one damn broad, and kind of dismissive brush; either an attempt to downplay and shrug off my questioning as not worth addressing it properly, while throwing in a pinch of shade/suspicion for good measure, and thus come out looking better, or a somewhat subtle statement, right in the middle of a running game, that you don't like playing with me. The former is part of this game, the latter not so I'll leave it for post game.


avatar
Lifthrasil: [...] After all you started the game in the same way: out of all players you picked the only one who already had a (random) vote on him.
He did? A quick scan of the vote count I keep doesn't support it, but I might have missed it with all the early voting shenanigans. Could you point out where he did that?



avatar
dedoporno: Hm. Would you check your question to make sure you asked what you intended to ask as I don't see what's unclear in this particular setup. Anyway, I meant that in the line of "a guilty conscience needs no accuser" (is that the correct idiom for this? It's worded a bit different in my own language) meaning that he knew what he/they had done so he was already looking for it subconsciously. [...]
Actually, "a guilty conscience needs no accuser" is how I understood it, but seeing the interpretation of your mother-tongue expression, you didn't mean it that way (i.e. no guilt or remorse drive a need to confess a wrongdoing).


avatar
dedoporno: [...] And that automatically means it can only happen under the exact same circumstances? Also, this is no accusation at all. It's a concern. [...]
Accusation may have been a bit strong, but com'on, I find it hard to believe that you didn't get what point I was driving.


avatar
dedoporno: [...] What are your thoughts and lynch choices then?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBzJGckMYO4



avatar
blotunga: [...] Ok, the pooka vote is a bit fishing from my side, but I was trying to see reactions to it. You did at least react, though not the way I expected. [...]
What sort of reactions did you expect/were you looking for?


avatar
blotunga: [...] I will try to be more active a bit later if we start to hear from others too.
And if we don't start hearing from others, you won't?


Need to attend to my guests, will check back in a couple of hours or so.