Lifthrasil: Yep. That's me. Always dodging your questions. Sorry if I have other suspect priorities than you. [...]
HypersomniacLive: You can have whatever suspects and related priorities you want. That's not the point. It's the way you've been going about things all Day long (trentonlf, PookaMustard, Korotan, supplementscene, and now SirPrimalform), and how you word/frame things (trentonlf/supplementscene, PookaMustard, Korotan, and now SirPrimalform further down); as I've said, your
scum-hunting looks and feels superficial, like you're mimicking your established town-play to appear to be game-solving.
You never directly address the things I question/challenge you about, often going for the "oops" excuse which you then use to appear hard at game-solving and scum-hunting (like with PookaMustard and supplementscene), and straight out ignore my follow up when I lay out how you dance around and dodge my questions.
Take this for example:
Lifthrasil: [...] Korotan latching on to that flimsy reason looked over-eager. [...]
HypersomniacLive: It'd seem that you look at Korotan's (re)actions in a vacuum, and that's the good version of it. In context, it comes across as trying to find things to pick on the easiest target, the weakest player (no offence, Korotan) who can't defend themself well. And when attention is drawn to it, you find a reason to back-pedal.
A broader look at your votes, and assuming they are honestly your suspects, I definitely don't like how you frame things. Look at how you prefaced your current vote on SirPrimalform for example [emphasis added]:
Lifthrasil: [...] SPF is also still scummy.
Either of these two would be a viable lynch for today in my eyes. Actually, I'll put them on equal footing for now. Then
you all can decide which wagon to drive.
vote SPF [...]
HypersomniacLive: What's that supposed to mean? It reads to me like you're trying to create a dichotomy - "it's either SirPrimalform or supplementscene" - and at the same time, shift responsibility about the outcome on the rest of us.
Lifthrasil: [...] But what about you? As usual, you ask a lot of questions but you don't share much of your own suspicions. So, who are your main suspects and why? [...]
HypersomniacLive: Almost sounds like it bothers you that I'm not more open so you can't adjust your play to get off my radar.
You're a smart person, Lifthrasil, does it really come as a surprise that you're my main suspect at the moment after the way I've questioned you since the start of D2?
People say you've upped your game, and while that may be true, I look at your play, and a few too many things don't add up with you this game. I've wondered if I'm reading too much into them, hence I've asked others about it, but I haven't got much feedback (only trentonlf and somewhat ZFR chimed in).
Vote Lifthrasil @all, asking again - am I reading too much into all of this?
I prefer Lifthrasil, but willing to go with supplementscene (indeed, dedoporno makes a good point, I think Lifthrasil made a similar one earlier) and SirPrimalform (even though Lifthrasl's voting him), not sure about anyone else even to avoid No-Lynch.
Also, meant to ask @ZFR - is Microfishd on the table for the same reasons as Yesterday, or has anything changed Today?
No offense taken. I know I am not the best and I stayed here because I want to learn to stand and fight for myself instead of just always running away when something hurts me.
supplementscene: A potential slip of Mafia knowledge is a weaker reason than voting for a lurky player? Especially when you used the exact same logic in voting for SPF? This is another example of your analysis not sounding genuine.
Lifthrasil: I didn't see that as potential slip of Mafia knowledge and I think I made that clear. As did others. The only one sticking to that was you. And voting for a lurky player is a good fallback solution if there is no other candidate to be found. But blotunga didn't even try to find a scummy player. He just voted for a player, who is less lurky than himself, for being lurky. That is hypocritical and makes the accusation of lurkiness seem like pretense. I encourage you to compare blotunga and Pooka and then tell me who of those two is lurkier. All blotunga did today was defend against you accusation. Pooka at least made an effort.
I can see somehow your reason because his vote seems strange and even less effertort than I think I did. But about hypocrit you critisized me for jumping around arround and now I see you jumping too.
Mayby I am taking it to personal too but what Blotunga did whas just one step above what DeadPorno would be ready to do too if I understood him correct. For me it really seems you just for those who you find fitting to pick up on and talk back when other confront you with questions and sayings that they make think first they are idiots.