Lifthrasil: @all: I would vote SPF or Scene, but would put blotunga on the table too. I thought again about his last post and it really looks as if he just skimmed the thread or used adalia's fundamentals to see who was silent for an extended period of time. That gave him a seemingly valid target without having to bother to read everything. Not reading everything is understandable with the health problems and IRL stuff. However, wanting to have a
seemingly valid target and voting, just to be voting, is scummy. I town player would not have to be worried about appearances so much.
@blotunga: please explain what else you find scummy about Pooka, apart from the posting frequency.
Until then:
vote blotunga I don't like this Lift. You voted for Korotan and myself for voting for Blotunga and now you're voting for Blotunga yourself. It seems like you jumped on the most likely wagon from Day 1 (me). To the most lurky player everyones said they'd vote for in SPF. To Blotunga who you claimed made an innocent mistake and voted for 2 other players based on the fact they voted for him. Yet you Liftrasil are now voting for the same player now he has had 2 votes and has another player. To me it screams opportunistic jumping to easy lynch target rather than genuine scum hunting. If your reads were genuinely surely you wouldn't be on Blotungas wagon.
Lifthrasil: Yep. That's me. Always dodging your questions. Sorry if I have other suspect priorities than you. [...]
HypersomniacLive: You can have whatever suspects and related priorities you want. That's not the point. It's the way you've been going about things all Day long (trentonlf, PookaMustard, Korotan, supplementscene, and now SirPrimalform), and how you word/frame things (trentonlf/supplementscene, PookaMustard, Korotan, and now SirPrimalform further down); as I've said, your
scum-hunting looks and feels superficial, like you're mimicking your established town-play to appear to be game-solving.
You never directly address the things I question/challenge you about, often going for the "oops" excuse which you then use to appear hard at game-solving and scum-hunting (like with PookaMustard and supplementscene), and straight out ignore my follow up when I lay out how you dance around and dodge my questions.
Take this for example:
Lifthrasil: [...] Korotan latching on to that flimsy reason looked over-eager. [...]
HypersomniacLive: It'd seem that you look at Korotan's (re)actions in a vacuum, and that's the good version of it. In context, it comes across as trying to find things to pick on the easiest target, the weakest player (no offence, Korotan) who can't defend themself well. And when attention is drawn to it, you find a reason to back-pedal.
A broader look at your votes, and assuming they are honestly your suspects, I definitely don't like how you frame things. Look at how you prefaced your current vote on SirPrimalform for example [emphasis added]:
Lifthrasil: [...] SPF is also still scummy.
Either of these two would be a viable lynch for today in my eyes. Actually, I'll put them on equal footing for now. Then
you all can decide which wagon to drive.
vote SPF [...]
HypersomniacLive: What's that supposed to mean? It reads to me like you're trying to create a dichotomy - "it's either SirPrimalform or supplementscene" - and at the same time, shift responsibility about the outcome on the rest of us.
Lifthrasil: [...] But what about you? As usual, you ask a lot of questions but you don't share much of your own suspicions. So, who are your main suspects and why? [...]
HypersomniacLive: Almost sounds like it bothers you that I'm not more open so you can't adjust your play to get off my radar.
You're a smart person, Lifthrasil, does it really come as a surprise that you're my main suspect at the moment after the way I've questioned you since the start of D2?
People say you've upped your game, and while that may be true, I look at your play, and a few too many things don't add up with you this game. I've wondered if I'm reading too much into them, hence I've asked others about it, but I haven't got much feedback (only trentonlf and somewhat ZFR chimed in).
Vote Lifthrasil @all, asking again - am I reading too much into all of this?
I prefer Lifthrasil, but willing to go with supplementscene (indeed, dedoporno makes a good point, I think Lifthrasil made a similar one earlier) and SirPrimalform (even though Lifthrasl's voting him), not sure about anyone else even to avoid No-Lynch.
Also, meant to ask @ZFR - is Microfishd on the table for the same reasons as Yesterday, or has anything changed Today?
Agreed about Lift's analysis seeming superfiscial, he hasn't commited to any wagon and it feels like he's going after 'soft targets'. Here's a post I made earlier in the day noting that:
So a couple of reads. Liftrasil aside from his vote on me has been very none commital all game long. I get a feeling that he doesn't want to offend anyone. People have talked about SPF not posting, which he hasn't but Liftrasil is almost equally withdrawn with a lack of commitment to analysing players other than myself. I realise that contradicts his vote on me but after Day 1 I did look like a safe wagon.
